AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 occupy opposite ends of the desktop spectrum. The data shows a decisive performance gap across every recorded benchmark, with the Intel part winning all 17 head-to-head comparisons. The average benchmark score for the AMD processor is 18,505, placing it at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel processor averages 75,488, sitting at the 95th percentile. This section breaks down the scale of those differences by workload.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single delta appears in the PassMark find prime numbers test. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 459, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE scores 52, a difference of 88.7 percent in favor of Intel. This indicates a massive advantage in integer-heavy, single-threaded algorithmic workloads.

Floating point math shows a similar trend. The Intel part records 194,988 in PassMark floating point math, versus 25,258 for the AMD part, an 87 percent delta. Data encryption also favors Intel heavily: 46,949 against 9,224, an 80.4 percent advantage. These three tests represent the widest margins in the dataset.

In Cinebench multi-core tests, the Intel processor is roughly three to four times faster. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 48,945 versus 12,511 for AMD, a 74.4 percent delta. Cinebench R20 multi-core shows 20,556 versus 5,254, also a 74.4 percent delta. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows 4,933 versus 1,260, a 74.5 percent delta. The consistency across these three Cinebench versions confirms a stable multi-threaded advantage rather than a test-specific anomaly.

Single-core performance is closer but still clearly favors Intel. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 6,909 versus 1,766, a 74.4 percent delta. In PassMark single thread, Intel scores 4,881 versus 3,828, a 21.6 percent delta. This is the smallest gap in the entire dataset, indicating that the AMD Zen 4 core is competitive on a per-thread basis but still trails the Arrow Lake design.

Other PassMark tests show deltas between 72.7 and 76.2 percent. Random string sorting: Intel 73,651 versus 20,134, a 72.7 percent delta. Extended instructions: Intel 45,357 versus 12,313, a 72.9 percent delta. Data compression: Intel 602,121 versus 162,623, a 73 percent delta. Multithread: Intel 56,602 versus 14,403, a 74.6 percent delta. Integer math: Intel 164,869 versus 40,348, a 75.5 percent delta. Physics: Intel 3,598 versus 857, a 76.2 percent delta.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE does not win any of the 17 recorded benchmarks. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 wins every single comparison. That said, the nature of the workloads reveals where each processor might still be adequate or even preferable in a system context, if not in raw score.

For single-threaded responsiveness, the AMD part is not far behind in relative terms. The 21.6 percent delta in PassMark single thread is the only sub-50 percent gap. This suggests that for lightly threaded tasks such as basic office work, web browsing, or legacy software, the AMD processor can deliver a usable experience, even though the Intel part is faster.

For multi-threaded rendering, video encoding, and data processing, the Intel processor is overwhelmingly dominant. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 indicates a processor capable of handling sustained all-core workloads. The AMD score of 12,511 is roughly a quarter of that, which places it in a different performance class entirely. The Intel part also dominates data compression, scoring 602,121 versus 162,623, which points to advantages in archiving and file management tasks.

The AMD processor is a 35 watt TDP part, versus 65 watts for the Intel. This may make it a fit for compact or thermally constrained builds where power draw is a primary concern. Its 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient for basic productivity, and its integrated Radeon 740M graphics provide a display output without a discrete GPU. The Intel part includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, but the benchmark data does not include graphics tests, so no comparison can be made there.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is the superior processor in every measured category. Its average benchmark score of 75,488 is over four times higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE's 18,505. The Intel part ranks at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD part ranks at the 72nd percentile.

The Intel processor is the choice for users who need maximum throughput in multi-threaded applications, heavy data processing, or high-end content creation. Its 24 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 5.60 GHz boost clock, deliver the scores shown in the Cinebench and PassMark suites. The AMD processor, with 4 cores and 8 threads and a 4.90 GHz boost clock, is a lower-power alternative for basic desktop tasks, but the benchmark results do not support choosing it over the Intel part for any performance-driven workload.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has a launch MSRP of $579. No pricing data exists for the AMD part in the database, so no cost comparison is possible. The selection between the two should be driven by performance requirements and system power constraints, not by benchmark parity, as none exists.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel processor scores 48,945, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE scores 12,511, a 74.4 percent advantage for Intel.

Q: What is the smallest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The smallest gap is in PassMark single thread, where Intel scores 4,881 and AMD scores 3,828, a 21.6 percent delta.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE win any benchmark?

A: No, the database records 17 head-to-head benchmarks, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 wins all 17.

Q: What are the core counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has 24 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has an average benchmark score of 18,505. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has an average benchmark score of 75,488.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses the Zen 4 architecture on the Phoenix2 codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It contains 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Arrow Lake architecture on the Arrow Lake-S codename, built on a 3 nm process, also at TSMC. It contains 17,800 million transistors on a larger 243 mm² die.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The AMD part provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part provides 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger cache hierarchy on the Intel side aligns with its higher core count and performance scores.

Both processors support DDR5 memory and dual-channel memory buses. The AMD part has a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while the Intel part has 102.4 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1851.

PCIe support differs by generation and lane count. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This gives the Intel processor a newer and wider interface for expansion cards and storage.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD processor includes Radeon 740M, while the Intel processor includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part is from the 8000 series, and the Intel part is from Core Ultra Series 2.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are the most prominent difference: 4 cores and 8 threads for AMD, versus 24 cores and 24 threads for Intel. Base clocks differ, with AMD at 3.40 GHz and Intel at 2.50 GHz, though Intel's boost clock of 5.60 GHz exceeds AMD's 4.90 GHz.

Thermal design power also separates the two. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is rated at 35 watts, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is rated at 65 watts. The AMD part uses 4 nm process technology, the Intel part uses 3 nm. Die sizes are 137 mm² for AMD and 243 mm² for Intel. Transistor counts are 20,900 million for AMD and 17,800 million for Intel.

Release dates differ by roughly eight months. The AMD processor was released in April 2024, and the Intel processor was released in December 2024. The Intel part has a listed launch MSRP of $579, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD part. Part numbers are 100-000001189 for AMD and SRQD4 for Intel.