AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a decisive result: the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T wins all 17 head-to-head comparisons against the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE. The margin is substantial across nearly every workload category, with the largest gaps appearing in compute-intensive tasks.

In Cinebench testing, the Intel part leads by a consistent margin. The R15 multicore test shows the Ultra 5 225T scoring 2214 against 1260 for the Ryzen, a 43.1% difference. The single-core R15 result is similar in percentage, with 312 versus 177, also 43.3% ahead. The R20 tests mirror this pattern: 9227 versus 5254 in multicore (43.1% delta) and 1302 versus 741 in single-core (43.1% delta). The R23 results continue the trend, with the Intel chip reaching 21971 compared to 12511 in multicore, and 3101 versus 1766 in single-core, both again at 43.1% differences.

The Passmark suite reveals where the Intel architecture pulls further ahead. The floating-point math test is particularly lopsided: the Ultra 5 225T scores 82751 while the Ryzen manages 25258, a 69.5% advantage. The physics test shows a 58.3% gap, with 2053 against 857. The prime number finding test is the most extreme outlier, with Intel scoring 284 versus AMD's 52, an 81.7% difference. Data encryption shows a 49.6% gap, with 18289 versus 9224.

Other Passmark tests show narrower but still significant margins. Extended instructions: 20083 versus 12313, a 38.7% gap. Integer math: 59543 versus 40348, 32.2% ahead. Multithread: 25358 versus 14403, 43.2% ahead. Data compression: 233998 versus 162623, 30.5% ahead. Random string sorting: 28774 versus 20134, exactly 30% ahead.

The closest result in the entire comparison is the Passmark single-thread test, where the Intel chip scores 4348 versus 3828, a 12% advantage. This shows that while the Intel part dominates in multi-core and specialized workloads, its single-thread lead, while clear, is comparatively modest. The average benchmark scores reflect the overall picture: the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T records an average score of 30468, placing it at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE averages 18505, at the 72nd percentile.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmark comparisons?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T wins all 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE does not win any.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in the Passmark find prime numbers test, where the Intel part scores 284 versus 52 for AMD, an 81.7% difference. The floating-point math test is the second largest, at 69.5%.

Q: How close are the two in single-threaded performance?

A: The closest result is Passmark single-thread, where Intel scores 4348 and AMD scores 3828, a 12% gap. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the gap is larger at 43.1%, with Intel at 3101 and AMD at 1766.

Q: What is the difference in average benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has an average benchmark score of 30468, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE averages 18505. This places the Intel chip at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs and the AMD chip at the 72nd percentile.

Q: How does the Intel part compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T's average score of 30468 sits within 0.3% of its closest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS and AMD Ryzen 7 7736U both trail by 0.3%, while the Intel Core i5-13600H leads by 0.3%.

Q: How does the AMD part compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE's average score of 18505 is effectively tied with the Intel Core i5-13420H, which differs by 0%. The Intel Core i3-14100F trails by 0.1%, and the Intel Core i3-13100 leads by 0.7%.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Phoenix2 codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It packs 20,900 million transistors into a 137 mm² die. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Arrow Lake architecture under the Arrow Lake-S codename, built on a more advanced 3 nm process, also at TSMC. Its transistor count is 17,800 million on a larger 243 mm² die.

Core counts differ sharply. The AMD part has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel part offers 10 cores and 10 threads. This means the Intel chip has no hyperthreading equivalent, yet still delivers far higher multi-threaded scores, suggesting the extra physical cores carry the workload in the recorded benchmarks. The AMD chip's 4-core, 8-thread configuration allows it to process two threads per core, but the raw core deficit proves decisive.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T offers 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a significantly larger 20 MB of shared L3. The larger L3 cache on the Intel part aligns with its consistent lead in data-heavy workloads such as compression and string sorting.

Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 for both, but the bandwidth figures differ. The AMD chip records 83.2 GB/s, while the Intel chip reaches 102.4 GB/s. The Intel part also uses PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, whereas the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes. ECC memory is supported on the AMD chip but not on the Intel chip.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses the Radeon 740M, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16 execution units. The process advantage (3 nm versus 4 nm) and the larger die on the Intel part likely contribute to its performance headroom, though the benchmark data does not isolate graphics performance.

The base clocks are 3.40 GHz for AMD and 2.50 GHz for Intel, but both boost to 4.90 GHz. The TDP rating is 35 W for AMD and 65 W for Intel, which explains why the Intel part can sustain higher performance across the recorded tests. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is the superior processor for virtually every measured workload. Its 10 physical cores, larger L3 cache, and higher memory bandwidth translate into wins across all 17 head-to-head tests. The most dramatic advantages appear in floating-point math (69.5% ahead), physics (58.3% ahead), and prime number finding (81.7% ahead). These are compute-heavy tasks where the Intel architecture shows clear dominance.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE retains a niche position. Its 35 W TDP is substantially lower than the Intel chip's 65 W, making it the more power-efficient choice for thermally constrained systems. It also supports ECC memory, which the Intel part does not. For users who require error-correcting memory and lower power draw, the AMD chip has distinct advantages that the benchmark scores do not capture.

For raw performance, the data points unambiguously to the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T. Its average benchmark score of 30468 places it in the 82nd percentile, far above the AMD chip's 18505 and 72nd percentile. The Intel part also sits among much faster company: its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-11980HK and AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, while the AMD chip competes with the Intel Core i3-14100F and Core i3-13100.

The choice between these two depends entirely on priorities. The Intel chip delivers overwhelming performance advantages in every recorded benchmark, with the smallest gap being 12% in single-threaded workloads. The AMD chip counters with a lower TDP and ECC support, making it suitable for specific professional or low-power deployments. For general desktop use, multi-threaded workloads, or any compute-intensive application, the recorded data favors the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T without qualification.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE | Intel Core Ultra 5 225T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 10 |

| Threads | 8 | 10 |

| Base clock | 3.40 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.90 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Arrow Lake |

| Codename | Phoenix2 | Arrow Lake-S |

| Process node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 20,900 million | 17,800 million |

| Die size | 137 mm² | 243 mm² |

| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 740M | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU |

| Release date | 2024-04-15 | 2024-12-31 |