AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE

CORE STATE Phoenix2
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.4 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i5-14490F

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,260
2,318
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
177
327
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
5,254
9,660
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
741
1,363
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
12,511
23,000
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,766
3,247
passmark_data_compression
162,623
340,026
passmark_data_encryption
9,224
18,225
passmark_extended_instructions
12,313
21,731
passmark_find_prime_numbers
52
122
passmark_floating_point_math
25,258
66,558
passmark_integer_math
40,348
87,844
passmark_multithread
14,403
28,662
passmark_physics
857
2,093
passmark_random_string_sorting
20,134
35,608
passmark_single_thread
3,828
3,873
passmark_singlethread
3,828
3,873

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core i5-14490F

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i5-14490F wins every single recorded comparison, 17 wins to 0 for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE. The largest margin appears in PassMark floating point math, where the Intel part scores 66,558 against 25,258, a 62.1% deficit for the AMD chip. The smallest margin is in single-threaded PassMark testing, where the Intel part scores 3,873 versus 3,828, a lead of only 1.2%.

Cinebench results tell a consistent story. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core i5-14490F posts 23,000 points against the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE's 12,511, a 45.6% gap. Single-core R23 shows 3,247 versus 1,766, also a 45.6% difference. The pattern repeats across R15 and R20: the Intel processor leads by exactly 45.6% in both multi-core and single-core tests in each version, except for R15 single-core where the deficit is 45.9%.

PassMark workloads amplify the Intel advantage. Data compression shows the Intel part at 340,026 versus 162,623, a 52.2% gap. Integer math delivers 87,844 against 40,348, a 54.1% difference. Prime number finding shows 122 versus 52, a 57.4% deficit. Physics simulation scores 2,093 versus 857, a 59.1% gap. Random string sorting reaches 35,608 versus 20,134, a 43.5% difference. Extended instructions produce 21,731 versus 12,313, a 43.3% gap. Data encryption results in 18,225 versus 9,224, a 49.4% difference. The multithread PassMark score is 28,662 versus 14,403, a 49.7% gap.

The overall average benchmark score confirms the hierarchy: the Intel Core i5-14490F averages 38,149 points, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE averages 18,505 points. The Intel processor sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD chip sits at the 72nd percentile.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with 4 cores and 8 threads. It is built on the Phoenix2 codename and belongs to the 8000 series. The Intel Core i5-14490F uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm Intel process, with 10 cores and 16 threads. It belongs to the Core 14th Gen series with the Raptor Lake-R codename.

The transistor counts differ substantially. The AMD chip packs 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The Intel chip has no transistor count recorded in the database, but its die size is 215 mm². The AMD processor is denser per square millimeter, which is consistent with the smaller process node.

Cache configurations reflect the core count differences. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14490F has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's larger L3 pool aligns with its multi-core advantage in the recorded benchmarks.

Memory support diverges. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but has no memory bandwidth figure in the database and does not support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core i5-14490F provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics separate the two clearly. The AMD chip includes a Radeon 740M integrated GPU. The Intel chip has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A. This means the AMD processor can power a display without a discrete GPU, while the Intel part requires a separate graphics card.

Clock speeds show a trade-off. The AMD chip runs a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boosts to 4.90 GHz, with a 35 W TDP. The Intel chip runs a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts to 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The Intel part draws more power but reaches a slightly higher boost frequency.

Socket compatibility also differs. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported for either.

Release dates place the AMD chip later. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE was released on 2024-04-15, while the Intel Core i5-14490F was released on 2023-12-31.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear winner for performance workloads. The Intel Core i5-14490F leads by roughly 45% or more in every Cinebench test and by 43% to 62% in most PassMark tests. Its only narrow win is in single-threaded PassMark, where it leads by 1.2%. The Intel part also sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the AMD part's 72nd percentile.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE does have redeeming qualities in the recorded specifications. It draws only 35 W TDP versus 65 W for the Intel chip, making it the more power-efficient option on paper. It includes integrated graphics, which the Intel chip lacks entirely. It supports ECC memory, which the Intel chip does not. And it uses a smaller 4 nm process node with a higher transistor density.

For users who prioritize raw compute performance, the Intel Core i5-14490F is the choice based on the benchmark data. For users who need integrated graphics, low power draw, or ECC memory support, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE offers those features in a compact 4-core package.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE includes a Radeon 740M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics and requires a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the single-threaded performance difference?

A: In PassMark single-thread testing, the Intel Core i5-14490F scores 3,873 versus 3,828 for the AMD chip, a 1.2% lead. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel chip leads by 45.6%, scoring 3,247 versus 1,766.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-14490F does not support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE supports DDR5 only. The Intel Core i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What are the power draw differences?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has a 35 W TDP. The Intel Core i5-14490F has a 65 W TDP.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14490F wins every benchmark category in the database. Its largest advantages appear in floating point math, where it leads by 62.1%, and physics simulation, where it leads by 59.1%. It also dominates prime number finding with a 57.4% gap and integer math with a 54.1% gap. The smallest Intel advantage is in single-threaded PassMark at 1.2%.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE wins on specification-level attributes rather than benchmarks. It has a lower TDP at 35 W versus 65 W, which suggests lower power consumption. It includes integrated graphics, enabling display output without a separate GPU. It supports ECC memory for error-correcting workloads. It uses a 4 nm process node versus 10 nm, which indicates a more modern manufacturing process. Its 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die show a denser design than the Intel chip's 215 mm² die.

For multi-core productivity, the Intel part is decisively ahead. Its 16 threads versus 8 threads, combined with 24 MB of L3 cache versus 8 MB, produce the consistent 45% to 50% leads in Cinebench and PassMark multithread tests. The Intel chip's 10-core configuration gives it a structural advantage in parallel workloads that the AMD chip cannot overcome despite its higher base clock.

For single-core responsiveness, the Intel chip still leads, but the margin is narrow in PassMark. The 1.2% gap there suggests that the AMD Zen 4 architecture is competitive in lightly threaded tasks. The larger Cinebench single-core gaps, however, indicate that the Intel chip holds a broader advantage in rendering-oriented single-thread workloads.

For compact or low-power systems, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is the only viable option among the two, given its 35 W TDP and integrated Radeon 740M graphics. The Intel chip needs a discrete GPU and draws nearly double the power.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE | Intel Core i5-14490F |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 10 |

| Threads | 8 | 16 |

| Base clock | 3.40 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.90 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Die size | 137 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 8 MB shared | 24 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 740M | N/A |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Phoenix2 | Raptor Lake-R |

| Release date | 2024-04-15 | 2023-12-31 |

| Transistors | 20,900 million | Not recorded |

| Part number | 100-000001189 | SRN35 |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
3 PRO 8300GE
i5-14490F
Core Specs
Cores
4
10 +150.0%
Threads
8
16 +100.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.4
2.5 -26.5%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.9
5 +2.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.4
2.5 -26.5%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.9
5 +2.0%
Multiplier
40
25 -37.5%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
8 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
65 +85.7%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
148 W
PPT
47 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Raptor Lake
Codename
Phoenix2
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen 3 (Zen 4 (Phoenix))
Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
20,900 million
—
Die Size
137 mm²
215 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
1 + 3
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
3.2 GHz up to 3.6 GHz
1800 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 740M
—
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001189
SRN35
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
Wraith Stealth
—
View Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE Details View Core i5-14490F Details