AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core i5-13420H Comparison

The Intel Core i5-13420H and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE are remarkably close in overall average benchmark scores, with the Intel part scoring 18511 and the AMD part scoring 18505, a difference of just 0.03%. Despite this near-identical aggregate, the two processors achieve parity through very different performance profiles, with the Intel chip winning 13 of the 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons while the AMD chip wins 4. This makes the choice between them highly workload-dependent rather than a simple matter of overall speed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic difference between the two appears in floating-point math, where the Intel Core i5-13420H scores 42806 against the AMD's 25258, a 69.5% advantage. This is the single largest delta in the entire comparison and suggests the Intel chip has a substantial edge in workloads that rely heavily on FPU throughput, such as scientific simulations or certain rendering tasks. Similarly, integer math heavily favors Intel, with a score of 58156 versus 40348, a 44.1% lead. These two results alone account for a significant portion of the Intel chip's overall win count.

In older Cinebench versions, the Intel part dominates decisively. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i5-13420H scores 1738 versus 1260 for the Ryzen, a 37.9% advantage, while in single-core it leads 238 to 177, a 34.5% gap. The R20 results narrow considerably but still favor Intel: 6013 to 5254 in multi-core and 848 to 741 in single-core, both showing a 14.4% lead. However, the trend reverses in Cinebench R23, where the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE takes the lead with 12511 in multi-core versus 11084 for Intel, an 11.4% advantage. In R23 single-core, the AMD chip also wins, scoring 1766 against 1689, a 4.4% margin. This suggests the AMD processor scales better with the newer, more demanding Cinebench workload.

The PassMark suite shows Intel winning most tests but with varying margins. Data compression favors Intel heavily, 209450 to 162623, a 28.8% lead. Data encryption also goes to Intel, 11559 to 9224, a 25.3% margin. The multi-thread test shows Intel ahead by 21.3%, scoring 17475 versus 14403. Physics tests give Intel an 18.1% lead (1012 vs 857). Random string sorting is closer, with Intel winning 22045 to 20134, a 9.5% margin. Extended instructions show a narrow Intel win, 12897 to 12313, a 4.7% edge. Prime number finding is a perfect tie at 52 for both.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE's wins are concentrated in single-threaded PassMark performance, where it scores 3828 against Intel's 3396, an 11.3% advantage. This is a notable reversal from the Cinebench R15 single-core result, where Intel led by 34.5%. The AMD chip also wins Cinebench R23 multi-core and single-core as noted above, but its four wins are far fewer than Intel's thirteen despite the near-identical average scores. The data clearly shows Intel winning on throughput-heavy tasks, while AMD wins on specific single-threaded workloads and the newer Cinebench version.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-13420H has an average benchmark score of 18511, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE scores 18505. The difference is minimal, with the Intel chip ahead by just 0.03%.

Q: Which CPU wins more individual benchmark comparisons?

A: The Intel Core i5-13420H wins 13 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE wins 4. Despite this, the overall average scores are nearly identical, indicating the AMD chip's wins are in categories with high weight.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE leads in Cinebench R23 multi-core, scoring 12511 versus the Intel's 11084, giving AMD an 11.4% advantage. This is the opposite of the Cinebench R20 result, where Intel led by 14.4%.

Q: Which processor has a better PassMark single-thread score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE wins PassMark single-thread, scoring 3828 against the Intel's 3396, an 11.3% margin. This is a key strength for the AMD chip.

Q: Is there a benchmark where the two are exactly tied?

A: Yes, in the PassMark find prime numbers test, both the Intel Core i5-13420H and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE score exactly 52, resulting in a 0% delta.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in PassMark floating-point math, where the Intel Core i5-13420H scores 42806 versus the AMD's 25258, giving Intel a 69.5% lead. This is more than double the next largest margin.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split based on workload type. For users running older Cinebench versions, heavy integer or floating-point math, data compression, encryption, or general multi-threaded PassMark workloads, the Intel Core i5-13420H is the stronger choice, often by very large margins. Its 69.5% lead in floating-point math and 44.1% lead in integer math make it the obvious pick for number-crunching tasks. It also wins in 13 out of 17 benchmarks, showing broader overall dominance.

For users who prioritize the newest Cinebench R23 results or PassMark single-thread performance, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is the winner. Its 11.3% lead in PassMark single-thread and 11.4% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core show that it handles the latest rendering workload more efficiently. However, these wins are fewer and narrower than Intel's, so the AMD chip is the specialized choice rather than the general-purpose one.

Given the nearly identical average scores, the decision should rest on which specific benchmarks matter most. The Intel chip is the safer bet for a wide range of compute-heavy tasks, while the AMD chip is preferable for users whose software aligns with Cinebench R23 and single-threaded PassMark scenarios. Neither chip is a clear overall winner, but the Intel part has more decisive victories in more tests.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ substantially in core configuration. The Intel Core i5-13420H has 8 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel chip has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, whereas the AMD chip runs at 3.40 GHz base and 4.90 GHz boost. The AMD chip has higher clock speeds but fewer cores.

The TDP also differs, with the Intel chip rated at 45 watts and the AMD chip at 35 watts. The memory support differs as well: Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports only DDR5. The AMD chip features ECC memory support, which the Intel chip lacks. The PCIe support is also different, with Intel offering Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only) and AMD offering Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ, with Intel using Iris Xe Graphics 80EU and AMD using Radeon 740M. The market segments differ too, with Intel being a Mobile part and AMD being a Desktop part. The release dates are different, with Intel releasing on 2023-01-03 and AMD on 2024-04-15.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is significant. The Intel Core i5-13420H uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node from Intel, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The AMD chip integrates 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, while Intel does not disclose transistor count or die size.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This means the Intel chip has more L2 and L3 cache per core, which likely contributes to its strong performance in data-intensive tests like data compression and encryption.

The AMD chip offers a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, which is not specified for the Intel chip. The sockets are different, with Intel using BGA 1744 and AMD using AM5. The codenames also differ, with Intel being Raptor Lake-H and AMD being Phoenix2. The Intel chip's L1 and L2 cache sizes are larger per core, while the AMD chip benefits from a smaller, more advanced process node and higher clock speeds.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-13420H wins decisively in floating-point math, integer math, data compression, data encryption, and multi-threaded PassMark workloads. It also wins in Cinebench R15 and R20 versions, both single and multi-core. These wins indicate the Intel chip is the stronger choice for general compute tasks, scientific calculations, database operations, and applications that use older Cinebench versions for rendering or validation. Its 8 cores and 12 threads provide a clear advantage in parallel workloads, as shown by the 21.3% win in PassMark multi-thread and 28.8% win in data compression.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core and single-core, plus PassMark single-thread. Its 4 cores and 8 threads are fewer, but the higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz and the more advanced 4 nm process node help it excel in the latest Cinebench workload and in single-threaded PassMark tasks. The AMD chip is the better pick for users running Cinebench R23 as their primary benchmark, or for workloads that are heavily single-threaded. Its 35-watt TDP and ECC memory support also make it a more efficient choice for desktop systems where power consumption and data integrity are priorities. The Intel chip, with its 45-watt TDP, is more suited to mobile platforms where raw throughput is needed despite higher power draw.