AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core i3-14100F Comparison

The Intel Core i3-14100F and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE are both compact 4-core, 8-thread desktop processors, yet they deliver distinctly different performance profiles. The Intel part takes the overall crown in computational throughput, winning 12 of 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the AMD chip counters with superior efficiency and a few specialized workload victories. Their average benchmark scores are nearly identical—18,519 for the Intel versus 18,505 for the AMD—placing both in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, but the distribution of wins reveals a clear split between raw compute and specific task acceleration.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i3-14100F dominates the Cinebench suite, a core indicator of rendering and multi-threaded performance. Across R15, R20, and R23, the Intel part wins every single-core and multi-core test by a consistent 4.6% margin. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel scores 13,084 against the AMD’s 12,511, while the single-core run shows 1,847 versus 1,766. The pattern is uniform: the Intel chip’s architectural advantage translates into a steady, predictable lead in CPU-bound rendering tasks.

The gap widens dramatically in specific PassMark workloads. The most striking result is floating-point math, where the Intel part scores 35,370 versus the AMD’s 25,258—a 40% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison. Physics simulations follow suit, with Intel winning 1,077 to 857, a 25.7% lead. Prime number finding shows a 17.3% edge (61 versus 52), and integer math lands at 12.4% ahead (45,357 versus 40,348). These results paint a picture of a processor that simply executes arithmetic and logical operations faster, which benefits scientific computing, engineering software, and any workload leaning on heavy computation.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE does not go down without a fight in less conventional areas. Its biggest victory comes in random string sorting, where it scores 20,134 against Intel’s 17,596—a 12.6% win. Data encryption also favors AMD, at 9,224 versus 8,922 (a 3.3% edge), and extended instructions show a 2.7% advantage (12,313 versus 11,984). The AMD chip also edges out the Intel part in single-threaded PassMark runs, scoring 3,828 versus 3,778, a narrow 1.3% margin. These wins suggest the Zen 4 architecture handles certain memory-access patterns and encryption algorithms more efficiently, even if its overall compute throughput lags.

In multi-threaded PassMark, Intel wins 15,420 to 14,403, a 7.1% margin, and data compression shows an 8.3% edge (176,106 versus 162,623). The overall average benchmark score for the Intel part is 18,519, which is just 0.1% above the AMD’s 18,505—a statistical tie in aggregate. Yet the head-to-head results show a clear winner for anyone prioritizing raw computational power, while the AMD part counters with better efficiency in specific niche tasks.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core i3-14100F is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, using Intel’s 10 nm process node. It features a die size of 163 mm², which is notably larger than the AMD chip. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process. This smaller process node allows AMD to pack 20,900 million transistors into a 137 mm² die, a density advantage that contributes to its lower power draw.

Cache hierarchies diverge significantly. The Intel part allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache. The AMD chip counters with 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, but only 8 MB of shared L3. This 4 MB deficit in L3 cache likely explains some of the Intel chip’s advantage in memory-heavy workloads like data compression, where it holds an 8.3% lead. The AMD part’s smaller cache footprint is offset by a higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz versus the Intel’s 4.70 GHz, though the Intel chip starts from a higher base clock of 3.50 GHz versus 3.40 GHz.

Memory support also differs. The Intel Core i3-14100F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, whereas the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE supports only DDR5. The AMD chip does provide a specified memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, a figure not listed for the Intel part. Both processors support ECC memory, making them suitable for workstation or server-adjacent builds. PCIe connectivity shows a generation gap: Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The most significant feature difference is integrated graphics—the Intel F-series has none (N/A), while the AMD chip includes a Radeon 740M iGPU, which is crucial for systems without a discrete graphics card.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE boosts to 4.90 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-14100F reaches 4.70 GHz.

Q: Does the AMD processor have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE includes a Radeon 740M integrated GPU, while the Intel Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics (N/A).

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has a TDP of 35 watts, which is significantly lower than the Intel Core i3-14100F’s 58 watts.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has only 8 MB.

Q: Do both CPUs support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i3-14100F and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE list ECC memory support as true.

Q: What is the largest benchmark margin between the two?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F wins floating-point math by 40%, scoring 35,370 versus the AMD’s 25,258.

The Verdict

The data directs a clear choice for compute-heavy users. The Intel Core i3-14100F is the superior processor for rendering, scientific simulations, and any workload dominated by floating-point or integer math, where it leads by margins ranging from 12.4% to 40%. Its consistent 4.6% advantage across all Cinebench tests makes it the default pick for content creators and engineers who rely on multi-threaded rendering. The higher 58-watt TDP is a trade-off for this performance, but the benchmark results justify the power draw for those who need maximum throughput.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is the better choice for power-constrained or compact builds. Its 35-watt TDP is 40% lower than the Intel part, making it far easier to cool in small form factor systems. The inclusion of the Radeon 740M iGPU eliminates the need for a discrete graphics card, which is a decisive factor for office desktops or media centers that do not require heavy GPU compute. The AMD chip also wins in encryption, extended instructions, and random string sorting, so it holds its own in security-focused and data-processing tasks. For users who prioritize efficiency, integrated graphics, and specific acceleration features over raw compute, the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is the rational pick. For everyone else, the Intel Core i3-14100F delivers more computational performance per benchmark dollar spent.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i3-14100F | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 3.50 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 58 W | 35 W |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 163 mm² | 137 mm² |

| Transistors | Not listed | 20,900 million |

| L1 Cache (per core) | 80 KB | 64 KB |

| L2 Cache (per core) | 1.25 MB | 1 MB |

| L3 Cache (shared) | 12 MB | 8 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 83.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes | Gen 4, 14 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | N/A | Radeon 740M |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket AM5 |

| Launch MSRP | $109 | Not listed |