AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core i3-14100 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE and Intel Core i3-14100 are both 4-core, 8-thread desktop processors, but benchmark results show they are optimized for distinctly different workloads. The Intel Core i3-14100 wins the majority of head-to-head tests, taking 12 of 17 comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE secures 5 wins, with its advantages concentrated in specific instruction-level and memory-bound tasks. Data indicates the Intel chip is the stronger all-round performer for conventional computing, while the AMD part carves out a niche in encryption and string manipulation workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-14100 dominates the multi-threaded and floating-point arenas. In PassMark floating point math, Intel leads by a massive 28.4%, scoring 35,266 against AMD's 25,258. This pattern repeats across integer math, where Intel posts 45,329 versus 40,348 (an 11% advantage), and in physics simulations, where Intel's 958 score beats AMD's 857 by 10.5%. The Intel chip also takes every Cinebench iteration, from R15 to R23, with consistent margins of 2.4-2.7% in both single-core and multi-core tests. Compression workloads favor Intel too, with a 6.6% lead in PassMark data compression (174,115 vs 162,623).

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE wins where the workload demands efficient data handling or specialized instructions. Its most significant victory is in random string sorting, where it beats Intel by 15.7% (20,134 vs 17,397). AMD also leads in data encryption by 4.4% (9,224 vs 8,838) and in extended instructions by 3.8% (12,313 vs 11,865). Notably, AMD edges out Intel in PassMark single-threaded performance, scoring 3,828 versus 3,759, a 1.8% margin. This suggests AMD's Zen 4 architecture handles certain single-threaded instruction patterns more efficiently despite Intel's higher clock speeds.

Architecture Differences

The two chips are built on fundamentally different manufacturing and design philosophies. AMD uses TSMC's 4 nm process with a 137 mm² die containing 20,900 million transistors, while Intel relies on its own 10 nm process with a larger 163 mm² die and no disclosed transistor count. AMD's Zen 4 architecture uses the Phoenix2 codename, whereas Intel's Raptor Lake-R is a refresh of the Raptor Lake design. These process differences explain why AMD achieves a 35W TDP compared to Intel's 60W TDP, making AMD significantly more power-efficient on paper.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. Intel provides 12 MB of shared L3 cache versus AMD's 8 MB, and larger per-core L1 (80 KB vs 64 KB) and L2 (1.25 MB vs 1 MB) caches. This gives Intel a raw capacity advantage that likely contributes to its floating-point dominance. However, AMD counters with support for DDR5 memory only and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 without a listed bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory and dual-channel configurations, but AMD's PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 14 lanes, whereas Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics also differ: AMD pairs the Radeon 740M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. AMD's socket is AM5, released April 15, 2024, while Intel uses Socket 1700, released January 7, 2024. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, and the Intel part has a listed launch MSRP of $134, while AMD's MSRP is not provided.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core i3-14100 for users who prioritize raw computational throughput. Across all Cinebench versions, Intel consistently outperforms AMD by roughly 2.4-2.7%, which, while modest, indicates a reliable performance edge in rendering and multi-core tasks. The 28.4% lead in floating-point math is decisive for scientific computing, financial modeling, or any workload heavy on FPU operations. The 10.5% advantage in physics simulations and 11% in integer math further cement Intel's position for general productivity and gaming-adjacent tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is the choice when power efficiency and specific instruction sets matter more than raw speed. Its 35W TDP, compared to Intel's 60W, makes it suitable for compact or thermally constrained systems. The 15.7% lead in random string sorting suggests advantages for database indexing or text-processing applications, while the 4.4% encryption lead benefits security-focused workloads. The 1.8% single-thread win, though small, shows AMD's architecture can win in specific conditions.

For most users, the Intel Core i3-14100 is the safer recommendation based on benchmark breadth. Its 12 wins versus AMD's 5, combined with larger margins in critical workloads, outweigh AMD's targeted advantages. However, the AMD chip's 35W TDP and wins in encryption and string operations make it the better fit for specialized, power-conscious deployments where those specific tasks dominate.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100 wins with a score of 12,820 versus AMD's 12,511, a 2.4% advantage.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE win any benchmark?

A: Yes, it wins 5 of 17 head-to-head tests: data encryption (4.4% lead), extended instructions (3.8% lead), random string sorting (15.7% lead), and PassMark single-thread (1.8% lead, listed twice).

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in PassMark floating-point math, where Intel leads by 28.4%, scoring 35,266 versus AMD's 25,258.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE and the Intel Core i3-14100 support ECC memory.

Q: What are the TDP differences?

A: The AMD chip has a 35W TDP, while the Intel chip has a 60W TDP, making AMD more power-efficient on paper.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100 has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has 8 MB.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i3-14100's dominance is most pronounced in floating-point math, where its 35,266 score dwarfs AMD's 25,258. This 28.4% margin is the single largest gap in the entire comparison. The Intel chip also wins every Cinebench test, with multi-core R23 scoring 12,820 versus 12,511 and single-core R23 scoring 1,809 versus 1,766, both representing 2.4% leads. PassMark multithread results follow the same pattern: Intel scores 15,095 against AMD's 14,403, a 4.6% advantage. Data compression favors Intel by 6.6% (174,115 vs 162,623), and integer math by 11% (45,329 vs 40,348).

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE's victories are fewer but notable for their magnitude. Random string sorting shows AMD's best result, winning 20,134 to 17,397, a 15.7% margin that suggests superior memory access patterns for sorting algorithms. Data encryption goes to AMD at 9,224 versus 8,838, a 4.4% edge. Extended instructions see AMD ahead by 3.8% (12,313 vs 11,865). The PassMark single-thread tests (listed twice as both "single_thread" and "singlethread") show AMD winning 3,828 to 3,759, a 1.8% margin that contradicts Intel's Cinebench single-core wins, indicating benchmark-specific architectural strengths.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category. AMD uses a 4 nm TSMC process with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, while Intel uses a 10 nm process on a 163 mm² die with no transistor count disclosed. AMD's base clock is 3.40 GHz with a 4.90 GHz boost, whereas Intel runs at 3.50 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost. TDP differs significantly: 35W for AMD versus 60W for Intel. AMD's cache is 64 KB L1, 1 MB L2, and 8 MB L3 per core, while Intel offers 80 KB L1, 1.25 MB L2, and 12 MB L3. Memory support shows AMD limited to DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. AMD has 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth; Intel lists none. PCIe capabilities differ, with AMD offering Gen 4 and 14 lanes versus Intel's Gen 5 and 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are the Radeon 740M for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. The release dates are April 15, 2024 for AMD and January 7, 2024 for Intel. Only Intel has a listed launch MSRP of $134.