AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core i3-13100 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE and the Intel Core i3-13100 are both 4-core, 8-thread desktop processors aimed at similar performance tiers, yet their architectural approaches and benchmark results reveal distinct personalities. The data shows the AMD part wins 14 of 17 head-to-head tests, including every Cinebench workload, while the Intel chip claims victory in floating-point math and a couple of other specific tasks. Both CPUs sit at the 72nd percentile among all processors, and their average benchmark scores are remarkably close — 18505 for the AMD versus 18380 for the Intel, a difference of just 0.7 percent. This makes the competition less about raw overall speed and more about which specific workloads each chip accelerates best, alongside platform-level considerations like power draw and memory support.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE boosts to 4.90 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-13100 reaches 4.50 GHz. Both have the same 3.40 GHz base clock.

Q: How much faster is the AMD chip in single-core Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE scores 1766 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is 4.4 percent ahead of the Intel Core i3-13100's 1692. The same 4.4 percent delta appears in Cinebench R15 and R20 single-core tests.

Q: Does the Intel chip win any benchmark categories?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i3-13100 wins PassMark floating-point math by a significant 21.9 percent (32325 versus 25258), integer math by 2.3 percent (41313 versus 40348), and physics by 1.5 percent (870 versus 857).

Q: What is the biggest benchmark margin between the two?

A: The largest win is in PassMark random string sorting, where the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE scores 20134 versus 15925 for the Intel, a 26.4 percent advantage. The AMD chip also leads PassMark data encryption by 14.6 percent.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE supports only DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, while the Intel Core i3-13100 supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part also lists ECC memory support, which the Intel chip does not offer.

Q: Are these CPUs in the same performance percentile overall?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE and the Intel Core i3-13100 are at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs. Their average benchmark scores differ by only 0.7 percent, with the AMD part scoring 18505 and the Intel scoring 18380.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is built on TSMC's 4 nm process using the Zen 4 architecture, under the Phoenix2 codename. It packs 20,900 million transistors into a 137 mm² die. In contrast, the Intel Core i3-13100 uses Intel's 10 nm process with the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-S, and its die measures 163 mm² with no transistor count listed in the data.

Cache hierarchies differ noticeably. The AMD chip allocates 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel part provides larger per-core caches — 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 — and more shared L3 at 12 MB. This gives the Intel processor a total cache advantage, which may explain its strength in certain math-heavy tasks.

The platforms diverge even further. AMD's chip uses Socket AM5 and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while Intel uses Socket 1700 and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Memory support is another split: the AMD processor is limited to DDR5, whereas the Intel part can work with DDR4 or DDR5. The integrated graphics also differ, with the AMD featuring a Radeon 740M and the Intel a UHD Graphics 730.

Power characteristics are a major architectural consequence. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core i3-13100 draws 60 watts. This nearly 2x difference in thermal design power suggests the AMD chip's efficiency comes from its smaller process node and denser transistor integration.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE dominates in Cinebench across the board, winning every multi-core and single-core test by margins between 4.1 and 4.4 percent. This includes Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both modes. The AMD chip also takes PassMark multithread by 4.9 percent, single-thread by 10.6 percent, and shows massive leads in random string sorting (26.4 percent) and data encryption (14.6 percent). Extended instructions also go to AMD by 11.4 percent.

The Intel Core i3-13100 establishes its wins in floating-point math, where its 32325 score beats AMD's 25258 by a striking 21.9 percent. It also edges ahead in integer math by 2.3 percent and physics by 1.5 percent. These wins suggest the Intel architecture handles certain numerical workloads more efficiently, even though it loses the overall benchmark count.

For practical use cases, the AMD chip appears better suited for productivity tasks that involve encryption, sorting, or general single-threaded responsiveness. The Intel part may be preferable for scientific or engineering workloads that stress floating-point calculations, where its 21.9 percent advantage is substantial.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE | Intel Core i3-13100 |

|---|---|---|

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 137 mm² | 163 mm² |

| Transistors | 20,900 million | Not listed |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 60 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| L1 Cache (per core) | 64 KB | 80 KB |

| L2 Cache (per core) | 1 MB | 1.25 MB |

| L3 Cache (shared) | 8 MB | 12 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 740M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Release Date | 2024-04-15 | 2023-01-03 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $134 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows a consistent pattern favoring the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, AMD scores 1260 against Intel's 1208, a 4.3 percent win. Single-core in the same test gives AMD 177 versus 170, a 4.1 percent margin. Cinebench R20 repeats this with AMD winning multi-core 5254 to 5034 and single-core 741 to 710, both by 4.4 percent. Cinebench R23 continues the trend: AMD takes multi-core 12511 to 11986 and single-core 1766 to 1692, again by 4.4 percent. These consistent margins across all three Cinebench versions indicate a stable architectural advantage for AMD in both threaded and single-threaded rendering workloads.

PassMark tests reveal a more nuanced picture. The AMD chip wins data compression narrowly at 162623 versus 161424, just 0.7 percent. Data encryption goes to AMD by a larger 14.6 percent (9224 versus 8049), and extended instructions favor AMD by 11.4 percent (12313 versus 11053). Random string sorting is the standout, with AMD scoring 20134 against Intel's 15925 — a 26.4 percent blowout that suggests AMD's memory subsystem or sorting algorithms are notably more efficient.

The Intel Core i3-13100 fights back in floating-point math, scoring 32325 versus AMD's 25258. This 21.9 percent victory is the single largest margin in either direction. Intel also wins integer math (41313 versus 40348, a 2.3 percent edge) and physics (870 versus 857, a 1.5 percent margin). The two chips tie in find prime numbers at 52 each.

Overall, the AMD chip secures 14 wins against 3 for Intel. The average benchmark scores reflect this: AMD's 18505 trails Intel's 18380 by just 0.7 percent, meaning the Intel chip's big floating-point win nearly offsets AMD's many smaller victories.

The Verdict

The data points to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE as the stronger all-around performer for most users. It wins every Cinebench test, which directly translates to faster rendering and media encoding workloads. Its 10.6 percent single-thread advantage in PassMark suggests snappier everyday application responsiveness. The 26.4 percent lead in random string sorting and 14.6 percent in encryption makes it a better choice for database operations, file compression, and security-related tasks. The lower 35-watt TDP also makes it the more efficient option, which could matter for compact or thermally constrained builds.

The Intel Core i3-13100 appeals to a narrower but real audience. Its 21.9 percent victory in floating-point math is impossible to ignore for anyone running simulations, scientific calculations, or financial modeling that relies heavily on FPU throughput. The 2.3 percent edge in integer math and 1.5 percent in physics add to its case for computational workloads. Its support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory also gives builders more flexibility in choosing RAM, and its PCIe Gen 5 interface offers newer connectivity standards. The launch MSRP of $134 provides a reference point, though no comparable AMD price is listed.

For a general-purpose desktop CPU, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE's broader benchmark dominance and efficiency make it the data-backed recommendation. For users whose primary applications are floating-point heavy, the Intel Core i3-13100's specialized strength justifies its selection. Both processors sit at the same 72nd percentile, so neither is a weak choice — but they serve different optimization targets.