AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core 7 253PE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE

CORE STATE Phoenix2
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.4 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 7 253PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,260
2,507
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
177
354
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
5,254
10,449
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
741
1,475
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
12,511
24,880
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,766
3,512
passmark_data_compression
162,623
339,133
passmark_data_encryption
9,224
18,385
passmark_extended_instructions
12,313
21,806
passmark_find_prime_numbers
52
138
passmark_floating_point_math
25,258
80,870
passmark_integer_math
40,348
114,158
passmark_multithread
14,403
29,271
passmark_physics
857
1,845
passmark_random_string_sorting
20,134
32,777
passmark_single_thread
3,828
3,955
passmark_singlethread
3,828
3,955

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core 7 253PE

The benchmark database places the Intel Core 7 253PE clearly above the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE in every recorded test. The data shows a dominant 17-0 sweep in favor of the Intel part, with the largest margins in multi-threaded workloads and the smallest in single-threaded tasks. The AMD chip, while efficient and modern, trails by roughly half in most Cinebench tests and by even larger amounts in PassMark math workloads. This analysis covers the architecture, benchmark deltas, specification gaps, and the use cases each processor serves.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE records an average benchmark score of 40557, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE records 18505. The Intel part sits in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the 72nd percentile for the AMD chip.

Q: How large is the advantage in multi-core rendering?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core 7 253PE scores 24880 versus 12511 for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE, a delta of -49.7% from the AMD side. The R20 multi-core test shows a similar pattern: 10449 for Intel and 5254 for AMD.

Q: Does the AMD chip win any single benchmark?

A: No. The head-to-head data lists 17 separate tests, and the Intel Core 7 253PE wins all 17. The smallest margin is in PassMark single-thread, where Intel scores 3955 against AMD's 3828, a delta of -3.2%.

Q: What is the difference in core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE provides 10 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE provides 4 cores and 8 threads. This 6-core, 12-thread gap directly contributes to the large multi-threaded deltas.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses the Radeon 740M, while the Intel Core 7 253PE uses UHD Graphics 730. The database records no benchmark scores for either iGPU, so no performance comparison can be made from the available data.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe connectivity?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE supports PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU. Both support dual-channel memory and ECC.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is built on TSMC's 4 nm process using the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename. It integrates 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The Intel Core 7 253PE uses Intel's 10 nm process, carries the Bartlett Lake codename, and does not have a recorded transistor count or die size in the database.

The core configurations differ sharply. AMD provides 4 cores and 8 threads, while Intel provides 10 cores and 20 threads. This 2.5x core advantage for Intel explains most of the multi-threaded performance gap. The AMD chip has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Intel chip has a lower base clock of 2.50 GHz but a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. AMD allocates 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3. The Intel L3 is more than four times larger, which benefits workloads with large working sets.

Memory support differs as well. AMD supports only DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both are dual-channel, but Intel's memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s versus AMD's 83.2 GB/s. Both processors support ECC memory. Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while AMD provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes.

The sockets are incompatible: AMD uses Socket AM5, Intel uses Socket 1700. The AMD part belongs to the 8000 series with a Ryzen 3 generation label. The Intel part is labeled Core 7 with a Bartlett Lake generation. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part launched in April 2024, the Intel part in March 2026.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 7 253PE dominates every recorded benchmark, but the margins vary by workload type. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 24880 against AMD's 12511, a -49.7% delta. The R20 multi-core test shows 10449 versus 5254, also -49.7%. The R15 multi-core test records 2507 versus 1260, a -49.7% delta. These consistent half-score results indicate a near-uniform doubling of multi-threaded throughput.

Single-core Cinebench results follow the same pattern. R23 single-core shows 3512 for Intel and 1766 for AMD, a -49.7% delta. R20 single-core shows 1475 versus 741, a -49.8% delta. R15 single-core shows 354 versus 177, a -50% delta. The Intel part effectively doubles single-threaded rendering performance in every Cinebench version.

PassMark integer math shows the largest absolute gap: Intel scores 114158, AMD scores 40348, a -64.7% delta. Floating-point math is even more lopsided: Intel scores 80870, AMD scores 25258, a -68.8% delta. Prime number finding shows Intel at 138 versus AMD at 52, a -62.3% delta. These three tests indicate that raw compute throughput is far higher on the Intel part.

Data compression favors Intel at 339133 versus 162623, a -52% delta. Data encryption shows 18385 versus 9224, a -49.8% delta. Extended instructions show 21806 versus 12313, a -43.5% delta. Random string sorting shows 32777 versus 20134, a -38.6% delta. Physics shows 1845 versus 857, a -53.6% delta. PassMark multi-thread shows 29271 versus 14403, a -50.8% delta.

The closest contest is PassMark single-thread. Intel scores 3955, AMD scores 3828, a -3.2% delta. This is the only test where the AMD chip stays within striking distance, though it still loses. The single-thread result suggests that per-core efficiency is similar, but the Intel part's higher boost clock and larger cache likely account for the edge.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are the most consequential difference. Intel provides 10 cores and 20 threads; AMD provides 4 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks differ: AMD at 3.40 GHz, Intel at 2.50 GHz. Boost clocks differ: AMD at 4.90 GHz, Intel at 5.50 GHz. Thermal design power differs: AMD at 35 W, Intel at 65 W.

Cache allocation differs per level. L1 per core: AMD 64 KB, Intel 80 KB. L2 per core: AMD 1 MB, Intel 2 MB. L3 shared: AMD 8 MB, Intel 33 MB. Process node: AMD 4 nm, Intel 10 nm. Foundry: AMD uses TSMC, Intel uses Intel. Transistor count is recorded only for AMD at 20,900 million; die size only for AMD at 137 mm².

Memory support: AMD only DDR5, Intel DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth: AMD 83.2 GB/s, Intel 89.6 GB/s. PCIe: AMD Gen 4 with 14 lanes, Intel Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: AMD Radeon 740M, Intel UHD Graphics 730. Sockets: AMD Socket AM5, Intel Socket 1700. Codename: AMD Phoenix2, Intel Bartlett Lake. Release date: AMD April 2024, Intel March 2026. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $384.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE wins no recorded benchmark. Its advantages are structural, not performance-based. The 35 W TDP is much lower than Intel's 65 W, making it suitable for power-constrained desktop builds. The 4 nm process from TSMC indicates a more modern manufacturing node. The smaller 4-core, 8-thread configuration aligns with light desktop duties.

The Intel Core 7 253PE wins all 17 recorded benchmarks. Its strengths are in multi-threaded rendering, where it doubles AMD's Cinebench scores. It also excels in math-heavy workloads, with floating-point and integer scores nearly three times higher. The 10-core, 20-thread setup, combined with 33 MB of L3 cache and a 5.50 GHz boost clock, delivers broad performance across every tested category.

For workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, or scientific computing, the Intel part is the clear choice based on the data. The AMD chip remains viable only for low-power desktop systems where the 35 W envelope and compact 4-core design are priorities. Even there, the Intel part's single-thread score is 3.2% higher, so no performance argument favors AMD.

The Verdict

The benchmark data delivers an unambiguous result: the Intel Core 7 253PE outperforms the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE in every recorded test. The Intel part doubles or nearly doubles AMD's Cinebench scores across R15, R20, and R23. PassMark math tests show even larger margins, with integer and floating-point scores roughly three times higher.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE should be selected only when the 35 W TDP and 4 nm process are mandatory requirements. Its 4 cores and 8 threads limit it to basic desktop workflows. The Intel Core 7 253PE should be selected for any workload where performance matters, given its 10 cores, 20 threads, 33 MB of L3 cache, and 5.50 GHz boost clock. The recorded data shows no scenario where the AMD chip wins, so the verdict rests entirely on the Intel part's measured superiority.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
3 PRO 8300GE
7 253PE
Core Specs
Cores
4
10 +150.0%
Threads
8
20 +150.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.4
2.5 -26.5%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.9
5.5 +12.2%
Frequency (GHz)
3.4
2.5 -26.5%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.9
5.5 +12.2%
Multiplier
40
25 -37.5%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
8 MB (shared)
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
65 +85.7%
PL1
65 W
PL2
219 W
PPT
47 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Codename
Phoenix2
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 3 (Zen 4 (Phoenix))
Core 7 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
20,900 million
Die Size
137 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
1 + 3
E-Core Frequency
3.2 GHz up to 3.6 GHz
P-Core Turbo
5.3 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 740M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$384
Part Number
100-000001189
SA4QE
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
Wraith Stealth
View Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE Details View Core 7 253PE Details