AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core 5 330 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE and Intel Core 5 330 are both 72nd-percentile performers, yet they achieve that standing through radically different designs and benchmark profiles. The AMD part is a 4-core, 8-thread Zen 4 desktop chip on Socket AM5, while the Intel part is a 6-core, 6-thread Wildcat Lake mobile processor on BGA 1516. The head-to-head data shows Intel winning 14 of 17 tests, but the three AMD victories are decisive and point to a clear division of labor: Intel dominates raw compute and single-threaded tasks, while AMD leads in specific memory-intensive and integer workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 330 claims victory in every Cinebench iteration, from R15 to R23, in both single-core and multi-core tests. Its multi-core margin is consistent at approximately 4.9% across all three Cinebench versions, while single-core margins hover near 4.8%. This suggests a fundamental throughput advantage in sustained rendering workloads. The Intel part also wins PassMark's multithread test by 6.9%, scoring 15471 against 14403, and it extends that lead to a 28.6% margin in PassMark physics (1201 vs 857). The most dramatic Intel wins are in floating-point math, where it posts 43885 against 25258 for a 42.4% lead, and in prime number finding, where it scores 114 versus 52 — a 54.4% advantage. Intel also takes data encryption (11076 vs 9224, a 16.7% lead) and extended instructions (12808 vs 12313, a 3.9% margin), plus single-threaded PassMark at 4088 versus 3828, a 6.4% edge.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE wins only three tests, but they are not minor ones. Its largest victory is in PassMark integer math, where it scores 40348 against Intel's 33258 — a 21.3% lead. It also wins data compression decisively at 162623 versus 145287, an 11.9% margin, and random string sorting at 20134 versus 17771, a 13.3% advantage. These three wins share a common thread: they involve moving and organizing data rather than pure arithmetic. The AMD chip's 8 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory bus appear to serve these workloads better than Intel's 6 MB L3 and single-channel bus. The Intel part has a higher boost clock at 4.60 GHz versus 4.90 GHz for AMD, yet still wins single-threaded tests, which indicates architectural efficiency differences rather than raw clock dominance.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core 5 330 as the stronger all-around processor for general computing, rendering, and most productivity tasks. Its sweep of all six Cinebench tests, combined with wins in multithread, physics, encryption, and single-thread performance, makes it the default choice for users whose workloads resemble those benchmarks. The 42.4% lead in floating-point math is particularly significant for scientific or financial applications that rely heavily on such operations. The Intel part also holds a slight edge in extended instructions, suggesting better optimization for modern instruction sets.

However, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is the better choice for specific data-heavy workloads. Its 21.3% lead in integer math and 11.9% lead in data compression indicate that it handles database-style operations and file compression more efficiently. The 13.3% margin in random string sorting reinforces this pattern. For a system dedicated to data processing, log analysis, or compression tasks, the AMD part's wins are substantial enough to outweigh its losses elsewhere. The AMD chip also offers ECC memory support, a feature absent from the Intel part, which matters for data integrity in professional environments.

The Intel Core 5 330 carries a launch MSRP of $309, but both processors sit at the same 72nd percentile overall. The AMD part's average benchmark score is 18505, while Intel's is 18345 — a difference of less than 1%. The Intel part's nearest rival is the Intel Core 7 360 at 18374 with a deltaPct of -0.2, while the AMD part's nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-13420H at 18511 with a deltaPct of 0. Both chips are effectively equivalent in aggregate performance. The choice comes down to workload type: Intel for general compute and rendering, AMD for data manipulation and integer-heavy tasks.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest Intel win is in PassMark find prime numbers, where it scores 114 against AMD's 52, a 54.4% advantage. This test is highly sensitive to single-threaded integer performance and branch prediction, areas where Intel's Wildcat Lake architecture clearly excels. The second-largest Intel margin is in floating-point math at 42.4%, with Intel scoring 43885 versus 25258. This indicates that Intel's execution units handle floating-point operations with far greater efficiency, likely due to wider SIMD capabilities or better scheduling. Intel also wins PassMark physics by 28.6% (1201 vs 857), which reflects its advantage in multi-threaded physics simulations.

In Cinebench, Intel's margins are consistent but modest, ranging from 4.8% to 4.9% across all tests. The R23 multi-core score shows Intel at 13150 versus AMD's 12511, while R23 single-core shows 1856 versus 1766. This consistency suggests that Intel's advantage scales uniformly with thread count, which is notable given that Intel has 6 cores and 6 threads versus AMD's 4 cores and 8 threads. Despite having fewer threads, Intel's 6 physical cores outperform AMD's 4 cores with simultaneous multithreading in every multi-core test.

AMD's largest win is in PassMark integer math at 21.3%, scoring 40348 against 33258. This is followed by random string sorting at 13.3% (20134 vs 17771) and data compression at 11.9% (162623 vs 145287). These three wins share a pattern of memory access and data manipulation rather than pure computation. AMD's dual-channel memory bus provides 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth versus Intel's single-channel 59.7 GB/s, a difference that likely explains these victories. The AMD part also has a higher base clock at 3.40 GHz versus 1.50 GHz, which may help in latency-sensitive operations.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core 5 330 scores 13150 versus AMD's 12511, a 4.9% advantage. Intel wins all three Cinebench versions in both single and multi-core tests.

Q: Does the AMD processor win any benchmark by a large margin?

A: Yes, AMD wins PassMark integer math by 21.3% (40348 vs 33258) and data compression by 11.9% (162623 vs 145287). Its largest win is in integer math.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap is in PassMark find prime numbers, where Intel leads by 54.4% (114 vs 52). The second-largest is floating-point math at 42.4% (43885 vs 25258).

Q: How do their overall benchmark averages compare?

A: AMD's average benchmark score is 18505, while Intel's is 18345. Both processors sit at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, a difference of less than 1%.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 330 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: AMD provides 83.2 GB/s through a dual-channel DDR5 bus, while Intel provides 59.7 GB/s through a single-channel bus that also supports LPDDR5X.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a Phoenix2 codename. It integrates 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The Intel Core 5 330 uses the Wildcat Lake codename on a 3 nm Intel process, with transistor count and die size not listed. AMD's process node is larger but the chip is a desktop part, while Intel's smaller node serves a mobile segment. AMD's cache layout is 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. Intel's cache is 192 KB L1 total, 2.5 MB L2, and 6 MB shared L3. AMD's per-core cache design gives each of its 4 cores more dedicated L2, while Intel's smaller total cache is shared differently across 6 cores.

AMD features a Radeon 740M integrated GPU, while Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. Both support DDR5 memory, but Intel also supports LPDDR5X. AMD's memory bus is dual-channel with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel's is single-channel with 59.7 GB/s. AMD provides 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, while Intel provides 6. AMD supports ECC memory; Intel does not. AMD is a desktop part on Socket AM5, while Intel is a mobile part on BGA 1516. AMD's base clock is 3.40 GHz with a boost of 4.90 GHz, while Intel's base is 1.50 GHz with a boost of 4.60 GHz. AMD's TDP is 35 watts, while Intel's is 15 watts.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in core count, with AMD offering 4 cores and 8 threads versus Intel's 6 cores and 6 threads. AMD's base clock is 3.40 GHz, significantly higher than Intel's 1.50 GHz, but Intel's boost clock of 4.60 GHz trails AMD's 4.90 GHz. AMD's TDP is 35 watts, while Intel's is 15 watts. AMD uses Socket AM5, while Intel uses BGA 1516. AMD's process node is 4 nm from TSMC, while Intel uses 3 nm from its own foundry. AMD's cache includes 64 KB L1 per core and 1 MB L2 per core, while Intel has 192 KB L1 total and 2.5 MB L2. AMD's L3 is 8 MB shared, while Intel's is 6 MB shared. AMD supports only DDR5, while Intel supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. AMD's memory bus is dual-channel with 83.2 GB/s, while Intel's is single-channel with 59.7 GB/s. AMD supports ECC memory, while Intel does not. AMD provides 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while Intel provides 6. AMD's integrated graphics is Radeon 740M, while Intel's is Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. AMD is a desktop part, while Intel is a mobile part. AMD's release date is April 2024, while Intel's is April 2026. Intel has a launch MSRP of $309, while AMD's is not listed. Both processors have locked multipliers. AMD's part number is 100-000001189, while Intel's is SAE3G.