AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core 3 304 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE dominates, scoring 12511 versus the Intel Core 3 304's 5263. That is a 137.7% advantage for AMD in this test.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 304 win any benchmark categories?

A: Yes, the Intel part wins 4 of the 17 head-to-head tests. It leads in Cinebench R15 single-core, PassMark find prime numbers, floating point math, and physics, though the physics margin is narrow at only 1.3%.

Q: How do the two chips compare in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has an average benchmark score of 18505 across all tests, while the Intel Core 3 304 averages 13745. This places AMD in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs versus Intel's 68th percentile.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores but only 5 threads, meaning it lacks simultaneous multithreading.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD part boosts to 4.90 GHz, while the Intel chip reaches 4.30 GHz. AMD's base clock is also much higher at 3.40 GHz versus Intel's 1.50 GHz.

Q: What memory configurations do these processors support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE supports dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory. The Intel Core 3 304 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X but only in single-channel mode with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth and no ECC.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. AMD uses the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with the Phoenix2 codename. Intel's Core 3 304 uses the Wildcat Lake codename on a 3 nm process fabricated by Intel itself.

AMD integrates 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. Intel does not disclose transistor count or die size in the database. The AMD chip uses a 4-core, 8-thread layout with 64 KB L1 cache per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. Intel uses a 5-core, 5-thread design with 192 KB total L1, 2.5 MB L2, and 6 MB shared L3.

The integrated graphics differ substantially. AMD pairs the CPU with a Radeon 740M. Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core. Both support PCIe Gen 4, but AMD provides 14 CPU lanes while Intel offers only 6.

Socket compatibility separates them completely. AMD uses the AM5 socket, a desktop platform. Intel uses BGA 1516, a mobile socket. The market segments confirm this: AMD is listed as Desktop, Intel as Mobile.

Power characteristics diverge sharply. AMD has a 35 W TDP, while Intel is rated at 15 W. The AMD chip has a higher boost clock at 4.90 GHz versus 4.30 GHz, and a much higher base clock at 3.40 GHz versus 1.50 GHz.

The release dates differ by two years. AMD launched on April 15, 2024. Intel follows on April 15, 2026. Both are currently active in production.

The Verdict

The data points to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE as the stronger performer in most workloads. It wins 13 of 17 head-to-head tests, including every Cinebench multi-core test, the PassMark multithread test, integer math, data compression, and random string sorting. The average benchmark score gap is substantial: 18505 versus 13745.

For users building a desktop system with AM5, the AMD part offers significantly higher multi-core throughput. The 137.7% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core is the largest single margin in the comparison. Single-core performance is effectively tied in Cinebench R23 (1766 versus 1765, a 0.1% difference), and AMD wins PassMark single-thread by 5.9%.

The Intel Core 3 304 serves a different purpose. Its 15 W TDP and mobile socket point to low-power or portable designs. It wins floating point math by 15% and find prime numbers by 23.5%, suggesting strengths in specific math workloads. The 5-core design without hyperthreading keeps power low but limits multi-core scaling.

Users needing maximum multi-core performance on a desktop platform should choose AMD. Users constrained by power budgets or building on mobile platforms should evaluate Intel, particularly for floating point heavy tasks.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE | Intel Core 3 304 |

|----------------|------------------------|------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 5 |

| Threads | 8 | 5 |

| Base clock | 3.40 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.90 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Process node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 192 KB total |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 2.5 MB total |

| L3 cache | 8 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe lanes | Gen 4, 14 lanes | Gen 4, 6 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 740M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release date | April 15, 2024 | April 15, 2026 |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $309 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE shows its largest advantage in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 12511 against Intel's 5263, a 137.7% margin. Cinebench R15 multi-core also favors AMD heavily at 1260 versus 849, a 48.4% lead. Cinebench R20 multi-core gives AMD 5254 against 4160, a 26.3% advantage.

In single-core tests, the picture varies. Cinebench R15 single-core goes to Intel with 264 versus 177, a 33% win. Cinebench R20 single-core flips to AMD at 741 versus 587, a 26.2% margin. Cinebench R23 single-core is nearly identical: AMD 1766, Intel 1765, with AMD ahead by just 0.1%.

PassMark workloads split along predictable lines. AMD wins data compression by 41.7% (162623 versus 114775), data encryption by 8.5% (9224 versus 8501), extended instructions by 27.1% (12313 versus 9686), integer math by 63.8% (40348 versus 24640), multithread by 23.9% (14403 versus 11625), random string sorting by 47.4% (20134 versus 13659), and single-thread by 5.9% (3828 versus 3614).

Intel claims four wins. Floating point math goes to Intel at 29722 versus 25258, a 15% margin. Find prime numbers favors Intel 68 versus 52, a 23.5% lead. Physics is close: Intel 868 versus AMD 857, only 1.3% apart. Cinebench R15 single-core is Intel's other win as noted.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE delivers decisive wins in multi-threaded workloads. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows the largest gap at 137.7%, and the PassMark multithread test confirms a 23.9% edge. Integer math is another strong area with a 63.8% advantage. Data compression and random string sorting both exceed 40% margins. These results indicate AMD excels at rendering, compilation, compression, and general productivity tasks that scale across threads.

The AMD part also holds a solid edge in single-thread performance in most newer tests. Cinebench R20 single-core shows a 26.2% lead, and PassMark single-thread gives AMD 5.9%. The R23 single-core tie at 0.1% suggests the architectures are closely matched in that specific test.

The Intel Core 3 304 wins in floating point math by 15%, indicating an advantage in scientific or engineering calculations that rely on FPU throughput. Find prime numbers shows a 23.5% lead, pointing to strength in integer-heavy algorithms with specific patterns. The physics test margin is minimal at 1.3%, essentially a tie.

Intel's single-core win in Cinebench R15 (33%) is notable but does not carry into R20 or R23. The 15 W TDP makes Intel suitable for thermally constrained environments, while the mobile BGA socket targets laptops rather than desktop builds.

For users prioritizing rendering, data processing, and multi-core throughput, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is the clear choice. For floating point workloads or power-sensitive mobile designs, the Intel Core 3 304 has specific advantages that may matter more than raw multi-core scores.