AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE and the Intel Core 3 201TE. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, meaning there are no recorded side-by-side test results for these two specific processors. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has a comprehensive set of benchmark scores, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database at all.

What can be established from the available data is the performance profile of the AMD part on its own. The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE scores 12,511 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,766 points in Cinebench R23 single-core. In Cinebench R20, it delivers 5,254 multi-core and 741 single-core. Its Cinebench R15 results show 1,260 multi-core and 177 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 14,403, a single-thread score of 3,828, and an average benchmark score of 18,505.

The AMD processor sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all recorded processors. Its nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core i5-13420H with an average score of 18,511, which is essentially identical (0 percent delta), and the Intel Core i3-14100F at 18,519, which trails the AMD part by 0.1 percent. The Intel Core i3-13100 scores 18,380, placing it 0.7 percent behind, and the Intel Core 7 360 also scores 18,374, likewise 0.7 percent behind.

Since the Intel Core 3 201TE has no benchmark data, no direct wins can be assigned to either processor. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE shows strong single-thread performance in Cinebench R23 with 1,766 points, and its multi-thread score of 12,511 demonstrates solid scaling across its 4 cores and 8 threads. The PassMark physics test yields 857, while integer math reaches 40,348 and floating-point math reaches 25,258. The data compression score of 162,623 and encryption score of 9,224 round out its workload coverage.

The Intel Core 3 201TE, by contrast, has no measured results, so its actual performance cannot be compared numerically. The database records a percentile ranking of 50 for the Intel part, but with an average benchmark score of 0, this percentile appears to reflect its lack of recorded data rather than an actual performance measurement.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the database records, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is the only processor of the two with verified performance data. Its 4-core, 8-thread configuration with Zen 4 architecture delivers competitive results, as shown by its 72nd percentile ranking and its position alongside processors like the Intel Core i5-13420H and Intel Core i3-14100F in average score. The data indicates that the AMD part performs at a level comparable to those established rivals, with deltas within 0.7 percent.

The Intel Core 3 201TE cannot be evaluated for performance from the available records. Its empty benchmark array means no score exists to compare against the AMD processor. The selection between these two processors, from a pure data standpoint, favors the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE because it has demonstrated results, while the Intel part does not. The AMD processor also operates at a 35 W TDP compared to the Intel part’s 45 W TDP, a difference recorded in the database that suggests lower power draw for the AMD chip.

For workloads measured in Cinebench and PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE shows balanced capability between single-thread and multi-thread tasks. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1,766 and multi-core score of 12,511 indicate that it handles both lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads without significant imbalance. The Intel Core 3 201TE, lacking any recorded scores, leaves no basis for a performance recommendation.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE have any direct benchmark comparisons against the Intel Core 3 201TE?

A: No. The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the Intel Core 3 201TE has no individual benchmark scores recorded.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has an average benchmark score of 18,505. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13420H, has an average score of 18,511, which is effectively identical with a 0 percent delta.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE compare to the Intel Core i3-14100F?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F has an average benchmark score of 18,519, which is 0.1 percent lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE’s 18,505. This places the two processors within a negligible margin of each other.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has a TDP of 35 W, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has a TDP of 45 W. This is a 10 W difference in favor of the AMD part.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 201TE have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Core 3 201TE has an empty benchmark array and an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile ranking of 50 is recorded, but no individual test scores exist.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE scores 1,766 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 741 in Cinebench R20 single-core. Its PassMark single-thread score is 3,828.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE and Intel Core 3 201TE differ across several recorded specifications. The AMD part has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, while the Intel part has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The AMD processor has a TDP of 35 W, the Intel processor has a TDP of 45 W.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel Core 3 201TE uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part supports DDR5 memory only, whereas the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Memory bandwidth differs as well: the AMD processor records 83.2 GB/s, while the Intel processor records 76.8 GB/s.

PCIe support varies between the two. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core 3 201TE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 740M, and the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730.

The process node and foundry differ significantly. The AMD processor is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel processor is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The die size for the AMD part is 137 mm², while the Intel part has a die size of 163 mm². The AMD processor has 20,900 million transistors, while the Intel processor has no transistor count recorded.

Cache configurations differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 3 201TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

The launch MSRP for the Intel Core 3 201TE is $134. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has no launch MSRP recorded. Both processors have 4 cores and 8 threads, and both support ECC memory. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is based on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix2. It belongs to the Ryzen 3 generation and the 8000 series. The Intel Core 3 201TE is based on the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 generation. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process node from Intel.

The AMD processor’s Zen 4 architecture supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a recorded bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The Intel processor’s Bartlett Lake architecture supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a recorded bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both processors support ECC memory, and both have 4 cores and 8 threads.

The cache hierarchy differs in structure. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 3 201TE allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, with 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part therefore has larger L1 and L2 caches per core and a larger L3 cache overall.

The integrated graphics differ by architecture. The AMD part uses Radeon 740M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. The PCIe interface also reflects architectural differences: the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes, while the Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD processor’s transistor count is recorded at 20,900 million, while the Intel processor has no transistor count listed. Both processors have a production status of Active, with the AMD part released on 2024-04-15 and the Intel part released on 2025-01-12.