AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Intel Core i7-11375H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Intel Core i7-11375H are both 4-core, 8-thread mobile processors, but they deliver surprisingly different performance profiles depending on the benchmark suite used. The AMD chip wins six of eight head-to-head tests, yet the Intel chip takes the two Geekbench victories by a wide margin. This split suggests the choice depends heavily on which workloads you prioritize, as neither processor is a universal winner.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U dominates every Cinebench test, with a consistent advantage of roughly 8.4–8.7% across all versions. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD scores 1068 versus Intel's 985, an 8.4% win. The single-core R15 result is similar: 150 for AMD versus 138 for Intel, an 8.7% edge. This pattern repeats in R20 and R23, where the AMD chip posts 4454 and 10605 respectively, against Intel's 4105 and 9775 — each an 8.5% margin. The consistency of these deltas across multiple Cinebench generations indicates a fundamental architectural advantage in rendering workloads, not a fluke of one test version.

The story flips completely in Geekbench. The Intel Core i7-11375H scores 5383 in multi-core versus AMD's 4532, a massive 15.8% lead. Single-core Geekbench shows Intel at 1800 versus AMD's 1573, a 12.6% advantage. These are substantial gaps — far larger than the Cinebench margins in AMD's favor. What's striking is that the Intel chip wins by double digits in Geekbench but loses by single digits in Cinebench. This suggests Geekbench's workload mix favors Intel's higher peak clocks, while Cinebench's sustained rendering load benefits from AMD's architecture.

Looking at raw averages, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U holds a slight edge with an average benchmark score of 3063 versus Intel's 3018. Both sit at the 52nd percentile among all CPUs, placing them in the same overall performance tier. The AMD's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 4980U and AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, with deltas of -0.1% and +0.3% respectively, while Intel's closest competitors are the Intel Xeon E-2334 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U, both at +1% delta. Neither chip is a standout in its class; they're both mid-pack performers.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U uses the Zen 3 architecture on a 7 nm process from TSMC, codenamed Barcelo-R. It's part of AMD's 7000 series and has a die size of 180 mm² with 10,700 million transistors. The Intel Core i7-11375H uses the Tiger Lake architecture on Intel's 10 nm process, codenamed Tiger Lake-H, with a die size of 146.1 mm². AMD's smaller process node gives it a density advantage, but Intel's die is physically smaller.

Cache layouts differ notably. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. Intel offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip has larger per-core caches and 50% more L3, which likely contributes to its Geekbench strength. AMD's total cache is smaller, yet it still wins Cinebench, indicating that raw cache size isn't the deciding factor for rendering workloads.

Clock speeds favor Intel on paper: base clock of 3.00 GHz versus AMD's 2.30 GHz, and boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus AMD's 4.30 GHz. Despite the lower clocks, AMD wins Cinebench, meaning Zen 3's instructions-per-clock efficiency overcomes the frequency deficit. The TDP difference is also significant: AMD is rated at 15W versus Intel's 28W, yet AMD delivers higher Cinebench scores. That efficiency gap is a key differentiator for laptop battery life and thermals.

Memory support is identical: both use DDR4 with dual-channel buses and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. AMD supports ECC memory while Intel does not. For PCIe, AMD offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while Intel provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: AMD has Radeon Graphics (Vega 6) while Intel has Iris XE 96EU. Both are mobile parts, but AMD's socket is FP6 while Intel uses BGA 1449.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U wins with a score of 10605 versus Intel's 9775, an 8.5% advantage.

Q: Why does the Intel chip win Geekbench so decisively?

A: The Intel Core i7-11375H scores 5383 in multi-core and 1800 in single-core, beating AMD's 4532 and 1573 by 15.8% and 12.6% respectively. Its higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz and larger 12 MB L3 cache likely drive these wins.

Q: Do both processors have the same core and thread counts?

A: Yes, both have 4 cores and 8 threads. This is confirmed in the specification data for both processors.

Q: Which chip is more power-efficient?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U has a 15W TDP versus Intel's 28W TDP, yet it wins all Cinebench tests. This means AMD delivers better rendering performance at a lower power envelope.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i7-11375H does not have ECC support.

Q: What is the release date difference between these two?

A: The AMD chip was released on 2023-01-03, while the Intel chip was released on 2021-01-10. The AMD part is roughly two years newer.

Specification Differences

• Process Node: AMD uses 7 nm (TSMC); Intel uses 10 nm (Intel)
• Die Size: AMD is 180 mm²; Intel is 146.1 mm²
• L1 Cache (per core): AMD has 64 KB; Intel has 80 KB
• L2 Cache (per core): AMD has 512 KB; Intel has 1.25 MB
• L3 Cache (shared): AMD has 8 MB; Intel has 12 MB
• Base Clock: AMD is 2.30 GHz; Intel is 3.00 GHz
• Boost Clock: AMD is 4.30 GHz; Intel is 5.00 GHz
• TDP: AMD is 15W; Intel is 28W
• Socket: AMD uses FP6; Intel uses BGA 1449
• PCIe: AMD is Gen 3 with 16 lanes; Intel is Gen 4 with 20 lanes
• Integrated Graphics: AMD has Radeon Graphics (Vega 6); Intel has Iris XE 96EU
• ECC Memory: AMD supports it; Intel does not
• Transistors: AMD has 10,700 million; Intel's count is not listed
• Release Date: AMD is 2023-01-03; Intel is 2021-01-10
• Launch MSRP: Intel is $482; AMD has no listed MSRP

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is the better rendering processor, winning all six Cinebench tests by roughly 8.5% each. The Intel Core i7-11375H is the better Geekbench processor, winning both tests by margins of 12.6% to 15.8%. If your work involves Cinebench-style rendering, the AMD chip is the obvious pick — it delivers more performance at a lower 15W TDP. If your workloads align with Geekbench's patterns, the Intel chip's higher clocks and larger cache give it a decisive edge.

The average benchmark scores favor AMD slightly (3063 versus 3018), but both processors sit at the 52nd percentile, meaning neither is a class leader. The Intel chip's $482 launch MSRP is notable, but that figure alone doesn't justify choosing it over AMD's lower-power alternative. For sustained rendering, AMD's consistent wins at lower power make it the more practical choice. For bursty, single-threaded tasks where Geekbench's 5.00 GHz boost matters, Intel takes the lead. The deciding factor should be your specific workload mix, not the overall average.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U wins in: All Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 tests, both single-core and multi-core, with margins of 8.4% to 8.7%. This makes it the superior choice for rendering, 3D modeling, and any workload that scales with sustained multi-threaded performance. Its 15W TDP also makes it a better fit for thin-and-light laptops where thermal headroom is limited. ECC memory support adds value for users who need data integrity in their workflows.

Intel Core i7-11375H wins in: Both Geekbench tests, with a 15.8% multi-core lead (5383 versus 4532) and a 12.6% single-core lead (1800 versus 1573). This indicates strength in applications that reward high boost clocks and large L3 cache — think software compilation, certain productivity suites, and tasks with short, intense bursts. Its PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes is also a forward-looking advantage for fast NVMe drives and external GPU enclosures. The larger per-core L2 cache (1.25 MB versus 512 KB) may help in latency-sensitive workloads.