AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE vs Intel Xeon E-2244G Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark data presents a remarkably one-sided picture. Across all six shared Cinebench workloads, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE wins every single test. The Intel Xeon E-2244G does not secure a single victory in any common benchmark. This is not a case of one part dominating in multi-threaded tasks while the other takes single-threaded honors; the AMD chip wins both categories consistently.

For users prioritizing raw Cinebench rendering performance, the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is the clear choice. Its advantage ranges from 10.4% to 10.6% depending on the specific workload. The consistency of this margin across both single-core and multi-core tests is notable. It suggests an architectural efficiency advantage rather than a core-count or threading benefit, since both processors have identical 4-core, 8-thread configurations.

The Xeon E-2244G does have one additional benchmark in the database, a Geekbench result, which the Ryzen part lacks. That score of 4712 multi-core and 1408 single-core provides a reference point, but without a corresponding Ryzen Geekbench result, it cannot be directly compared. In the workloads where both parts were measured, the Xeon trails across the board.

The percentile rankings tell a similar story. Both processors sit at the 49th percentile among all CPUs in the database, meaning they occupy essentially the same overall performance tier. The average benchmark score for the Ryzen is 2596, while the Xeon averages 2527. That 69-point gap translates to roughly a 2.7% average difference, smaller than the Cinebench deltas but still favoring AMD.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is built on TSMC's 7 nm process node, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G uses Intel's 14 nm node. This process gap is significant. The AMD chip packs 9,800 million transistors into a 156 mm² die, whereas the Intel part, with its larger 14 nm transistors, uses a 126 mm² die. The AMD design achieves higher transistor density despite the smaller process advantage.

The microarchitectures are equally distinct. AMD uses Zen 2, codenamed Renoir, while Intel relies on Coffee Lake, specifically the Coffee Lake-S WS variant. Both are 4-core, 8-thread designs, so the differences come down to how each architecture extracts performance from those resources.

Cache hierarchies diverge substantially. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE has 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 4 MB of shared L3. The Xeon E-2244G also has 64 KB of L1 per core but only 256 KB of L2 per core, compensated by a larger 8 MB shared L3. This is a classic trade-off: AMD favors faster per-core L2 capacity while Intel doubles the shared L3 pool. For workloads that fit within 4 MB of L3, the AMD approach may reduce latency; for larger working sets, the Intel design could theoretically hold more data on-chip.

Memory bandwidth also favors AMD. The Ryzen supports DDR4 with a dual-channel bus delivering 51.2 GB/s, while the Xeon's dual-channel DDR4 configuration tops out at 42.7 GB/s. That is an 8.5 GB/s gap, roughly 20% more memory throughput for the AMD part. Both support ECC memory, which matters for workstation and server reliability.

The integrated graphics differ as well. AMD includes Radeon Vega 6 graphics, while Intel ships HD Graphics P630. Neither is a gaming powerhouse, but the presence of any integrated GPU means both can drive displays without a discrete card. The AMD Vega 6 is generally considered the more capable of the two in the database's context, though no direct graphics benchmarks are recorded.

The socket situation is worth noting. AMD uses Socket AM4, a mainstream desktop platform, while Intel uses Socket 1151. The market segments differ: AMD labels this as a Desktop part, while Intel classifies the Xeon as Server/Workstation. Production status also separates them. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE remains Active, while the Xeon E-2244G is End-of-life. The AMD part launched on 2022-11-10, over three years after the Intel chip's 2019-05-28 release.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results form a complete head-to-head picture, and the pattern is remarkably uniform. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Ryzen scores 904 against the Xeon's 818, a 10.5% advantage. The single-core result is nearly identical: 127 versus 115, a 10.4% edge. This consistency suggests the AMD architecture delivers its advantage uniformly across both lightly and heavily threaded workloads.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the Ryzen posts 3769 multi-core and 532 single-core, while the Xeon manages 3412 and 481 respectively. The multi-core delta is 10.5%, and the single-core delta is 10.6%. These margins are almost suspiciously consistent, hovering right around the 10.5% mark across all four R15 and R20 tests.

Cinebench R23 tells the same story. The Ryzen scores 8975 multi-core and 1267 single-core; the Xeon scores 8126 and 1147. The multi-core difference is 10.4%, single-core 10.5%. Across all six shared benchmarks, the AMD processor never dips below a 10.4% lead and never exceeds 10.6%. This is a remarkably narrow performance band, indicating that the advantage is structural rather than workload-dependent.

The Geekbench results for the Xeon, 4712 multi-core and 1408 single-core, cannot be compared directly since the Ryzen has no recorded Geekbench score. But they do provide a reference for where the Xeon sits in a broader context. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i3-10325 with an average score of 2530, a 0.1% delta, and the Intel Xeon E-2144G at 2514, a 0.5% delta. The Ryzen's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-8850H at 2604, a 0.3% delta against the AMD part, and the Intel Xeon E-2174G at 2588, a 0.3% delta.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2244G boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE tops out at 4.00 GHz. Despite this 0.80 GHz deficit, the AMD chip wins every single-core benchmark in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon win any benchmark against the AMD Ryzen?

A: No. Across six shared Cinebench tests, the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE wins all six. The Xeon's only additional data point is a Geekbench result with no corresponding AMD score for comparison.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE supports 51.2 GB/s of dual-channel DDR4 bandwidth. The Intel Xeon E-2244G supports 42.7 GB/s, also dual-channel DDR4. The AMD part offers roughly 20% more memory throughput.

Q: Are both processors compatible with ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE and the Intel Xeon E-2244G support ECC memory. This makes both viable for workstation and server applications where data integrity is critical.

Q: What process nodes are used by these two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is built on TSMC's 7 nm process. The Intel Xeon E-2244G uses Intel's 14 nm node. The AMD chip integrates 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die, while the Intel part uses 126 mm².

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE averages 2596 across all recorded benchmarks, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G averages 2527. That is a 69-point difference, approximately 2.7%, though the Cinebench deltas are consistently around 10.5%.

Specification Differences

The two processors diverge on several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G runs at 3.80 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost. The Xeon has higher clock speeds on paper, yet loses in every benchmark.

Power consumption differs dramatically. The AMD part has a 35 W TDP, while the Intel chip draws 71 W. That is more than double the thermal envelope for a processor that performs worse in every shared test. The Ryzen achieves superior performance at half the power budget, evidence of the efficiency of the 7 nm Zen 2 architecture.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The Ryzen has 512 KB of L2 per core versus the Xeon's 256 KB per core. The Xeon compensates with 8 MB of shared L3 versus the Ryzen's 4 MB. Both have 64 KB of L1 per core.

Memory bandwidth favors AMD at 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s for Intel. Both support dual-channel DDR4 and ECC. PCIe lanes are identical: Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The integrated GPUs differ. AMD ships Radeon Vega 6, while Intel includes HD Graphics P630. Sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket AM4 versus Intel Socket 1151. The AMD part is in the 4000 series, while the Intel is in the Xeon E-2200 series. Market segments also differ: AMD labels it Desktop, Intel labels it Server/Workstation.

Production status separates them further. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is Active, while the Xeon E-2244G is End-of-life. Release dates are far apart: the AMD chip launched on 2022-11-10, the Intel on 2019-05-28. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $272. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE outperforms the Intel Xeon E-2244G in every shared workload, with margins consistently between 10.4% and 10.6%. This is not a marginal victory or a workload-specific quirk. The AMD chip wins single-core, multi-core, and every Cinebench generation tested.

For users building a new system today, the choice is clear. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is an Active product on the mainstream AM4 platform, while the Xeon E-2244G is End-of-life on the older Socket 1151. The AMD part delivers more performance, at 35 W versus 71 W, with higher memory bandwidth. It is difficult to find a scenario in the recorded data where the Intel chip is the better recommendation.

The Xeon's higher clock speeds, 3.80 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost, do not translate into real-world wins. The Ryzen's lower clocks, 3.50 GHz base and 4.00 GHz boost, still produce faster Cinebench scores. This suggests the Zen 2 architecture extracts more instructions per clock than Coffee Lake, at least in these workloads. The larger L2 cache and newer process node likely contribute.

The Intel part does have a larger L3 cache at 8 MB versus 4 MB, which could benefit certain workloads with larger working sets. It also has a Geekbench result in the database, which the AMD chip lacks. But in the six tests where both were measured, the Intel part never comes close.

For buyers looking for a desktop processor with integrated graphics, ECC support, and strong Cinebench performance, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is the data-backed pick. For those specifically needing a Xeon for platform compatibility or legacy server integration, the E-2244G remains a functional option, but it is slower, hotter, and discontinued. The verdict from the measurements is straightforward: the Ryzen wins.