AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 2 architecture under the Renoir codename, manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process. With a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, this chip sits in the lower-midrange of AMD’s desktop lineup, yet its integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics and 35 W TDP class suggest a focus on compact and energy-conscious systems. Benchmark data places it at the 52nd percentile among all CPUs, indicating a mainstream performer rather than a flagship, but its exact positioning against rivals reveals a tight cluster of near-identical average scores that merit closer inspection.

Benchmark Performance

The Cinebench results for the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE show a clear split between single-thread and multi-thread capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 8975, while the single-core score is 1267. This represents a ratio of roughly 7.1:1 between multi-thread and single-thread throughput, which is typical for a 4-core/8-thread part — the hyper-threading overhead and core count limit scaling beyond that point. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore score drops to 3769 and single-core to 532, while in the older Cinebench R15, the processor scores 904 multicore and 127 single-core. The consistency across these versions indicates that the relative performance does not shift dramatically with workload intensity, though the R15 single-core score of 127 is notably low compared to modern desktop parts, reflecting the modest 4.00 GHz boost ceiling.

The average benchmark score across all tests is 2596, which places the chip at the 52nd percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database. This percentile suggests that roughly half of all processors outperform it, but the nearest rivals show that this average is not an outlier — instead, it sits in a dense performance band. The deltaPct values in the nearestRivals field are remarkably small: 0% against the Intel Core i7-1195G7, 0.1% against the Intel Core i5-1345UE, 0.3% against the Intel Xeon E5-4620 v3, and -0.4% against the Intel Xeon E-2174G. In practical terms, these deltas mean the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is statistically tied with all four rivals in overall average score, with differences of less than one-third of a percent. This is an unusual situation for a hardware comparison, as it implies that the choice between these CPUs will hinge on factors other than raw compute, such as platform features, power envelope, or integrated graphics.

How It Compares

Against the Intel Core i7-1195G7, the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE matches the average score exactly at 2596 with a deltaPct of 0%. The i7-1195G7 is a mobile-oriented Tiger Lake part, yet its 4-core/8-thread configuration and similar clock behavior produce identical average performance. The Ryzen chip’s advantage lies in its desktop AM4 socket and support for ECC memory, while the i7-1195G7 typically appears in thin-and-light laptops with soldered RAM. For a desktop builder, the PRO 4355GE offers a more upgradeable path, but raw compute is a dead heat.

The Intel Core i5-1345UE trails by just 0.1%, with an average score of 2593 versus 2596. This Raptor Lake-U processor is also a low-power part, often found in embedded or fanless systems, and its 10-core hybrid architecture does not yield a higher average than the Ryzen’s 4-core design. The delta is so small that benchmark noise could easily reverse the ordering, so the data suggests these two are interchangeable in multi-threaded throughput. The i5-1345UE may offer better efficiency per watt, but the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE counters with a dedicated desktop platform that allows for discrete GPU installation.

The Intel Xeon E5-4620 v3 is an older server chip from the Haswell-EP generation, yet it posts an average score of 2587, which is 0.3% behind the Ryzen. That Xeon has far more cores (likely 10 or more) but runs at lower clocks, and its average is pulled down by weaker single-thread performance. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE, despite having fewer cores, matches the server part in overall throughput, which speaks to the efficiency of Zen 2’s architecture. However, the Xeon supports massive memory capacities and quad-channel configurations, which the Ryzen cannot match.

The Intel Xeon E-2174G is the only rival that leads, with an average score of 2606, a deltaPct of -0.4% relative to the Ryzen. This is a 4-core/8-thread Coffee Lake workstation chip with a higher boost clock, and it edges out the PRO 4355GE by a hair. The difference is negligible in real-world terms, but the E-2174G lacks integrated graphics, whereas the Ryzen includes Radeon Vega 6. For systems that do not require a discrete GPU, the Ryzen’s iGPU is a decisive feature.

Power and Thermals

The Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE carries a TDP of 35 watts, which places it in the ultra-low-power desktop segment. This is not a typical desktop part — most mainstream Ryzen processors draw 65 W or more — but the 35 W class is designed for small-form-factor PCs, all-in-one systems, and industrial or commercial deployments where heat dissipation and electricity costs are tightly controlled. The data does not specify a cooler requirement, but the 35 W TDP implies that a basic low-profile air cooler or even a passive cooler in a well-ventilated chassis would suffice. The 7 nm process from TSMC helps keep thermals manageable, and the 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die are packed densely, but the low clock speeds (3.50 GHz base) are a direct trade-off for staying within that power envelope. Benchmark scores in this range typically require active cooling under sustained loads, but the thermal headroom is substantial compared to higher-TDP parts.

Platform and Compatibility

This processor uses the AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature platform with a long lifespan, though the PRO 4355GE is a Renoir part from the Zen 2 generation. It supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s — a figure that is modest by modern standards but adequate for the integrated GPU and office workloads. ECC memory is supported, which is a notable feature for budget workstation or server builds where data integrity matters. The PCIe interface is Gen 3 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, which means it can drive a single high-end graphics card or a couple of NVMe drives, but it lacks the PCIe Gen 4 support found on newer AMD platforms. The integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics eliminates the need for a discrete GPU in basic systems, and the chip is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is off the table. The production status is listed as Active, and the release date is 2022-11-10, indicating this is a current product, though with no launch MSRP provided, pricing information is not available for analysis. The upgrade path on AM4 is limited to other Zen 2 or Zen 3 processors, but the platform itself is not forward-compatible with newer sockets.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE perform in multi-threaded workloads?

A: In Cinebench R23 multicore, it scores 8975, and in Cinebench R20 multicore, it scores 3769. These results place it in the 52nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2596.

Q: Does this processor include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it features Radeon Vega 6 integrated graphics, which allows for display output without a discrete GPU.

Q: What memory type does it support?

A: It supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: Is the processor overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.

Q: What socket does it use?

A: It uses the AMD Socket AM4, which is compatible with a wide range of motherboards from that platform generation.

Q: How does it compare to the Intel Core i7-1195G7?

A: The average benchmark scores are identical at 2596, with a deltaPct of 0%, meaning there is no measurable performance difference in overall throughput.

Who Should Consider It

The Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is best suited for users who need a quiet, low-power desktop for everyday computing. Its 35 W TDP makes it ideal for small-form-factor builds where heat is a concern, and the integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics handles basic video playback and 2D applications without a dedicated card. For office productivity — word processing, spreadsheets, web browsing — the single-core score of 1267 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient for responsive interactions, while the multicore score of 8975 ensures smooth multitasking across several applications. However, for gaming, this processor is not a strong choice. The integrated Vega 6 GPU is not designed for modern 3D titles, and the CPU’s 4-core layout will bottleneck high-end discrete graphics cards; the PCIe Gen 3 interface also limits bandwidth compared to newer platforms. Content creation, such as video editing or 3D rendering, is possible but not recommended — the multicore scores are competitive with the Xeon E5-4620 v3, but the lack of cores means render times will lag behind 6-core or 8-core alternatives. This chip shines in commercial or industrial PCs where reliability (ECC support) and low power draw are prioritized over raw performance.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The split between single-thread and multi-thread performance is stark and defines the processor’s character. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score of 1267 is low compared to modern desktop parts that often exceed 2000, but the multicore score of 8975 shows that the 8 threads scale well within the 35 W envelope. The ratio of 7.1:1 is exactly what you would expect from a 4-core/8-thread CPU with hyper-threading — each additional thread adds about 12.5% of the single-thread performance, and the scaling is nearly linear in these benchmarks. This means that workloads that rely heavily on single-thread performance, such as spreadsheet macros, legacy software, or certain database queries, will feel slower than on a chip with higher boost clocks. Conversely, workloads that can use all threads — video encoding, batch file processing, or compilation — will see the multicore score come into play, and the 8975 result places it on par with the Xeon E5-4620 v3, which has many more cores but lower clocks. The practical implication is that this processor rewards users who can parallelize their tasks, but penalizes those who depend on fast single-thread responsiveness. The 4.00 GHz boost clock is the ceiling, and it is not high enough to compete with the 5 GHz-class parts in the same socket family. For a balanced desktop experience, this split suggests that the PRO 4355GE is a workhorse for background tasks, but not a sprinter for interactive workloads.