AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE vs Intel Xeon E-2174G Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE and Intel Xeon E-2174G are both 4-core, 8-thread processors aimed at professional use, but benchmark results show a consistent and decisive performance gap. The AMD part wins all six head-to-head Cinebench comparisons, with the data indicating a clear generational and architectural advantage.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE outperforms the Intel Xeon E-2174G in every single Cinebench test recorded. The most striking result is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the AMD chip scores 8975 against the Intel's 8091, a 10.9% advantage. This is not a narrow margin; it represents a substantial lead in sustained multi-threaded workloads.

The single-core results follow the same pattern. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE scores 1267, which is 10.9% higher than the Xeon's 1142. This is particularly notable because the Xeon E-2174G has a higher base clock (3.80 GHz vs 3.50 GHz) and a significantly higher boost clock (4.70 GHz vs 4.00 GHz). Despite the Intel part's clock speed advantage on paper, the AMD architecture delivers better real-world single-threaded performance as measured by Cinebench.

The pattern holds across older Cinebench versions as well. In Cinebench R20, the AMD chip wins multi-core with 3769 versus 3398 (a 10.9% delta) and single-core with 532 versus 479 (an 11.1% delta). In Cinebench R15, the margins are slightly larger: the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE leads multi-core with 904 versus 815 (10.9%) and single-core with 127 versus 114 (11.4%). The consistency of these deltas—hovering around 11%—suggests a fundamental per-clock efficiency advantage for the AMD design, rather than a workload-specific quirk.

The average benchmark scores reflect this overall dominance. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE has an average benchmark score of 2596, while the Xeon E-2174G sits at 2588. The delta is a mere 0.3%, which is surprisingly small given the Cinebench results. This discrepancy is explained by the fact that the Xeon E-2174G has additional Geekbench results in its benchmark suite (5104 multi-core, 1559 single-core) which are not present for the AMD part, pulling its average up and masking the Cinebench deficit.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the head-to-head data, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is the clear winner in all rendering and CPU-bound compute tasks. The 10.9-11.4% advantage across all Cinebench iterations indicates that it is the superior choice for 3D rendering, video encoding, and any application that relies heavily on sustained CPU throughput, whether single-threaded or multi-threaded.

The Intel Xeon E-2174G does not win any of the six recorded head-to-head benchmark comparisons. However, its inclusion of Geekbench scores in the overall benchmark suite suggests it may have been tested in a wider range of scenarios. The Xeon’s higher clock speeds (3.80 GHz base, 4.70 GHz boost) could theoretically provide an edge in extremely latency-sensitive tasks that do not scale with cache or architecture improvements, but the Cinebench single-core results directly contradict this hypothesis. The data shows that the AMD chip is faster even in the single-core tests, making it difficult to identify a specific workload category where the Xeon would prevail based solely on the provided facts.

The Xeon E-2174G is positioned as a Server/Workstation part, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is a Desktop part. This suggests the Xeon may be favored in legacy enterprise deployments where platform stability and specific server features are prioritized over raw benchmark performance. However, from a pure performance standpoint, the data gives the AMD processor every win.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE, with a score of 8975, is 10.9% higher than the Intel Xeon E-2174G's 8091.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon E-2174G win any benchmark comparisons?

A: No. In the six head-to-head Cinebench tests recorded, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE wins all of them, with zero wins for the Intel part.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE has an average benchmark score of 2596, which is 0.3% higher than the Xeon's 2588. This is a very narrow margin, despite the larger Cinebench deltas.

Q: What is the difference in their boost clocks?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2174G has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE has a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. Despite this 0.70 GHz disadvantage, the AMD chip scores higher in single-core Cinebench tests.

Q: Are both processors currently in production?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE has an "Active" production status, while the Intel Xeon E-2174G is listed as "End-of-life."

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2174G has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, double the 4 MB shared L3 cache of the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ significantly in their core specifications, despite having the same core and thread count. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, while the Intel Xeon E-2174G is clocked higher at 3.80 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost. This clock speed advantage belongs entirely to the Intel part.

Power consumption is a major differentiator. The AMD chip has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Xeon is rated at 71 watts, more than double. This indicates that the AMD processor is significantly more power-efficient, likely due to its smaller manufacturing process.

The memory bandwidth also differs. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE supports DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the Intel Xeon E-2174G supports DDR4 with a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The AMD part offers approximately 20% more memory bandwidth.

Other specification differences include the socket (AMD Socket AM4 vs Intel Socket 1151), the integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 6 vs HD Graphics P630), and the production status (Active vs End-of-life). The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $334. The AMD part has no launch MSRP listed. The release dates are also different, with the Xeon launching in July 2018 and the Ryzen launching in November 2022.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is stark. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is built on the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed "Renoir," using a 7 nm process node from TSMC. In contrast, the Intel Xeon E-2174G uses the older Coffee Lake architecture, codenamed "Coffee Lake-S WS," on Intel's 14 nm process. This process node difference (7 nm vs 14 nm) is likely the primary driver of the AMD chip's superior performance and dramatically lower power consumption.

The cache hierarchy also differs. Both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core, but the AMD part has 512 KB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel part has only 256 KB per core. However, the Intel Xeon has a larger shared L3 cache at 8 MB, compared to the AMD's 4 MB. This means the AMD design prioritizes faster per-core L2 access, while the Intel design relies on a larger L3 pool.

The AMD processor integrates 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die, whereas the Intel processor's transistor count is not listed, but its die size is 126 mm². Both support ECC memory and have PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part is from the 4000 series, while the Intel is from the Xeon E-2100 series.

The Verdict

The data overwhelmingly favors the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE for anyone prioritizing raw compute performance. It is ahead by roughly 11% in every Cinebench test, both single-core and multi-core, despite having lower clock speeds. This indicates that the Zen 2 architecture is fundamentally more efficient at executing instructions per clock than the older Coffee Lake design. The AMD chip also uses less than half the power (35W vs 71W) and offers higher memory bandwidth.

The Intel Xeon E-2174G might be considered in scenarios where legacy platform compatibility is required, as it uses the LGA 1151 socket and was designed for server/workstation deployments. However, it is end-of-life, while the AMD part is still active. The Xeon's only listed advantage is its higher clock speeds (3.80 GHz base, 4.70 GHz boost) and double the L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB), but these do not translate into a single benchmark win. The data suggests that the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is the superior choice for any new deployment where performance and efficiency are the primary criteria.