AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Intel Xeon E-2324G Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data reveals a clear split between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G wins six of the eight recorded comparisons, while the Intel Xeon E-2324G takes the remaining two with substantially larger margins in Geekbench tests. The Cinebench suite, across all three versions (R15, R20, R23), shows a consistent pattern: the AMD part leads by 5.3% in both single-core and multi-core tests in every instance. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD scores 9287 against the Intel's 8797, a 490-point gap. In single-core R23, the AMD posts 1311 versus 1242.

The Geekbench results flip the narrative entirely. The Intel Xeon E-2324G leads by 14.1% in Geekbench multi-core (5257 versus 4608) and by a commanding 40.1% in Geekbench single-core (2059 versus 1470). This is the largest delta recorded in the head-to-head comparison, and it is unusual to see such a dramatic divergence between benchmark suites. The Cinebench results suggest the AMD processor holds a modest but consistent advantage in rendering workloads, while the Geekbench results indicate the Intel part excels in general-purpose and single-threaded scenarios as measured by that suite.

The average benchmark scores in the database place the Intel Xeon E-2324G at 2823 and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G at 2774. Both processors sit at the 51st percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Intel's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U at 2829 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i5-10600 at 2837 (0.5% higher), and the Intel Core i7-6800K at 2838 (0.5% higher). The AMD's closest competitor is the Intel Core i7-5930K at 2775, which is effectively tied with a 0% delta, followed by the Intel Xeon D-1567 at 2770 (0.1% lower) and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE at 2767 (0.2% lower). These figures indicate both CPUs occupy a similar performance tier in the overall database distribution.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Xeon E-2324G uses the Rocket Lake architecture on a 14 nm process node fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 276 mm². The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G uses the Zen 2 architecture on a 7 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 156 mm² and 9,800 million transistors. The smaller process node and die size for the AMD part reflect a denser, more modern manufacturing approach.

Core and thread counts differ meaningfully. Both have 4 physical cores, but the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G supports 8 threads through SMT, while the Intel Xeon E-2324G has 4 threads with no simultaneous multithreading. This explains why the AMD part consistently outperforms in Cinebench multi-core tests despite the Intel's higher boost clock. The Intel's base clock is 3.10 GHz with a boost of 4.60 GHz, while the AMD runs at 3.80 GHz base and 4.00 GHz boost. The Intel has a higher peak frequency by 0.60 GHz, which partially accounts for its strong Geekbench single-core showing.

Cache configurations also differ. The Intel Xeon E-2324G has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and only 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part therefore has double the L3 cache and a larger L1 cache per core.

Memory support is similar in several respects: both use DDR4, both feature dual-channel memory buses, and both have a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. Both also support ECC memory. The platforms diverge on PCIe: the Intel Xeon E-2324G provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ as well: the Intel uses UHD Graphics P750, while the AMD uses Radeon Vega 6. The market segments also differ, with the Intel aimed at Server/Workstation and the AMD at Desktop. The Intel was released on 2021-09-07, while the AMD launched on 2020-07-20.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2324G records an average benchmark score of 2823, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G records 2774. Both sit at the 51st percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Why does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G win all Cinebench tests?

A: The AMD part has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2324G has 4 cores and 4 threads. The extra threads contribute to the AMD's 5.3% lead in every Cinebench test, both single-core and multi-core, across R15, R20, and R23.

Q: What explains the Intel Xeon E-2324G's large Geekbench single-core win?

A: The Intel part boosts to 4.60 GHz compared to the AMD's 4.00 GHz, a 0.60 GHz advantage. The Geekbench single-core score of 2059 versus 1470 represents a 40.1% lead, the largest margin in the head-to-head data.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon E-2324G and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G support ECC memory, and both use DDR4 with dual-channel memory buses and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2324G provides Gen 4 PCIe with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G provides Gen 3 PCIe with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Q: How do the cache sizes compare?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2324G has 80 KB of L1 per core and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has 64 KB of L1 per core and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. Both have 512 KB of L2 per core.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every architectural field. The Intel Xeon E-2324G uses the Rocket Lake-E architecture on a 14 nm process node from Intel, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G uses Zen 2 (Renoir) on a 7 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel die measures 276 mm², while the AMD die measures 156 mm² with 9,800 million transistors. Thread counts differ: 4 threads for Intel versus 8 threads for AMD. Base clocks are 3.10 GHz for Intel and 3.80 GHz for AMD, while boost clocks are 4.60 GHz for Intel and 4.00 GHz for AMD.

The socket platforms are different: Intel Socket 1200 for the Xeon E-2324G versus AMD Socket AM4 for the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. Cache allocations differ in L1 (80 KB per core versus 64 KB per core) and L3 (8 MB shared versus 4 MB shared). PCIe support differs by generation and lane count: Gen 4 with 20 lanes for Intel versus Gen 3 with 16 lanes for AMD. Integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics P750 on Intel versus Radeon Vega 6 on AMD. The market segments are Server/Workstation for Intel and Desktop for AMD. Release dates are 2021-09-07 for Intel and 2020-07-20 for AMD. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $209, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The part numbers are SRKN7 for Intel and 100-000000148100-100000148MPK for AMD.

Identical specifications include 4 cores, 65 W TDP, DDR4 memory support, dual-channel memory bus, 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, and ECC memory support. Both have 512 KB of L2 cache per core. Both are currently in active production.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G wins all three Cinebench tests in both single-core and multi-core variants. This suite is commonly associated with rendering and 3D workload performance. The AMD part's 8 threads give it a structural advantage in multi-threaded rendering tasks, and its 5.3% lead in single-core Cinebench tests suggests it also handles lightly threaded rendering tasks well. The AMD's higher base clock of 3.80 GHz likely contributes to its Cinebench performance, as does the efficient 7 nm Zen 2 architecture.

The Intel Xeon E-2324G wins the Geekbench multi-core and single-core tests, with margins of 14.1% and 40.1% respectively. Geekbench is a general-purpose benchmark that exercises a broader range of everyday computing scenarios, from encryption to image processing to file compression. The Intel's 4.60 GHz boost clock and larger 8 MB L3 cache help it dominate in these measured scenarios. The 40.1% single-core advantage is particularly notable and suggests that single-threaded responsiveness is a strength for the Intel part. The Intel also offers Gen 4 PCIe with 20 lanes, which is useful for workstation configurations that require high-bandwidth storage or expansion.

The Verdict

The choice between these two processors depends on which benchmark suite aligns with the intended workload. For Cinebench-heavy tasks such as 3D rendering and content creation, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is the stronger performer, winning all six Cinebench comparisons by 5.3%. Its 8 threads over 4 cores provide the multi-threading capacity that rendering workloads demand.

For general-purpose computing as measured by Geekbench, the Intel Xeon E-2324G is the clear winner. Its 40.1% single-core advantage and 14.1% multi-core advantage are the largest margins recorded in this comparison. The Intel part also offers newer PCIe Gen 4 connectivity with 20 lanes, which matters for systems that need faster storage or expansion bandwidth.

The two processors are closely matched overall, with average benchmark scores of 2823 for Intel and 2774 for AMD, both at the 51st percentile. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is a desktop processor with integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics and an earlier release date of 2020-07-20. The Intel Xeon E-2324G targets the server and workstation segment with integrated UHD Graphics P750, a later release date of 2021-09-07, and a launch MSRP of $209.

Users prioritizing rendering throughput and multi-threaded Cinebench performance should favor the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. Users prioritizing general-purpose performance, single-threaded speed, and workstation-oriented features such as PCIe Gen 4 should favor the Intel Xeon E-2324G. The data does not support a single universal winner; the correct pick depends on the benchmark priorities of the workload.