AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Intel Core i5-10600 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data paints a consistent picture: the Intel Core i5-10600 wins all six recorded Cinebench comparisons against the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. The margins are uniform, with the Intel part leading by 5.6% in every multi-core and single-core test except one. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i5-10600 scores 988 against 936 for the Ryzen, a 5.6% advantage. The single-core R15 result shows 139 versus 132, a 5.3% lead. This pattern repeats in R20, where the Intel chip posts 4119 multi-core and 581 single-core, while the AMD chip records 3900 and 550, both deltas at 5.6%. The R23 results follow suit: 9809 against 9287 in multi-core, and 1384 against 1311 in single-core, again a 5.6% gap.

The consistency of these deltas across all tests suggests the performance difference is structural rather than workload-specific. The Intel part does not excel in one particular area; it simply maintains a steady edge across the entire Cinebench suite. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G does have an additional Geekbench result in the database, scoring 4608 multi-core and 1470 single-core, but no corresponding Intel Geekbench score exists for a direct comparison. The recorded data shows the i5-10600 with an average benchmark score of 2837, placing it at the 51st percentile of all CPUs. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G averages 2774, also at the 51st percentile. The nearest rivals for the Intel chip include the Intel Core i7-6800K at 2838 (0% delta), the Intel Xeon E-2126G at 2842 (-0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U at 2829 (0.3%). The AMD chip's closest competitor is the Intel Core i7-5930K at 2775 (0% delta), with the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE at 2767 (0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen 3 5400U at 2765 (0.3%) nearby.

These rival comparisons show both processors operating in a similar performance band, but the head-to-head data gives the Intel part a clear, if modest, victory in every measured category. The largest single win for the Intel chip is a 5.6% margin in R20 multi-core, R23 multi-core, and R23 single-core. The smallest is 5.3% in R15 single-core. There is no benchmark in the database where the AMD part takes the lead.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their underlying design. The Intel Core i5-10600 uses the Comet Lake architecture on a 14 nm process node, fabricated by Intel. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G employs the Zen 2 architecture (codenamed Renoir) on a 7 nm node from TSMC, with 4 cores and 8 threads. The process node difference is substantial: 14 nm versus 7 nm, giving AMD a density and efficiency advantage on paper. The AMD chip integrates 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die, while the Intel part does not have transistor or die size figures recorded in the database.

Cache configurations also differ markedly. Both chips share 64 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 256 KB per core on the Intel part, while the AMD chip has 512 KB per core, doubling the per-core L2 capacity. The L3 cache tells the opposite story: the Intel i5-10600 has 12 MB shared L3, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has only 4 MB shared L3. This gives Intel a threefold advantage in total L3 capacity, which partially compensates for the smaller L2. Memory bandwidth favors AMD, with the Ryzen chip rated at 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s for Intel, despite both using dual-channel DDR4.

The integrated graphics differ as well. Intel pairs the i5-10600 with UHD Graphics 630, while AMD includes Radeon Vega 6 graphics. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the Intel part. Both processors use PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip fits an Intel Socket 1200, while the AMD part uses AMD Socket AM4. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. The release dates are close: the Intel part launched on 2020-04-29, and the AMD part on 2020-07-20.

The Verdict

The data directs a clear choice for users prioritizing raw multi-threaded throughput: the Intel Core i5-10600. Its 6-core, 12-thread configuration delivers a 5.6% advantage over the 4-core, 8-thread Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G in Cinebench R20 and R23 multi-core tests. The single-core results show the same 5.6% edge in R20 and R23, with a slightly smaller 5.3% lead in R15. For workloads that scale with core count, such as rendering or compilation, the Intel part offers a consistent performance uplift. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G, however, counters with a 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth figure versus 42.7 GB/s for Intel, plus ECC memory support and a 7 nm process node with 9,800 million transistors. Users who require ECC memory validation or who favor AMD's more modern fabrication process may find the trade-off acceptable. The Intel chip also holds a large L3 cache advantage at 12 MB shared versus 4 MB shared. The recorded data shows both processors at the same 51st percentile overall, and their average scores (2837 versus 2774) differ by only 2.3%. This is a narrow contest, but the Intel part wins every direct benchmark in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-10600 | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |

|----------------|---------------------|------------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 4 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1200 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Comet Lake | Zen 2 (Renoir) |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 9,800 million |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 156 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | Radeon Vega 6 |

| Release Date | 2020-04-29 | 2020-07-20 |

| Part Number | SRH37 | 100-000000148100-100000148MPK |

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-10600 wins all multi-core Cinebench tests. It scores 988 versus 936 in R15 (5.6% lead), 4119 versus 3900 in R20 (5.6% lead), and 9809 versus 9287 in R23 (5.6% lead).

Q: How do the single-core scores compare?

A: The Intel chip also leads in single-core. It scores 139 versus 132 in R15 (5.3% lead), 581 versus 550 in R20 (5.6% lead), and 1384 versus 1311 in R23 (5.6% lead).

Q: Does the AMD processor have any advantages in the recorded specifications?

A: Yes. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has a higher base clock (3.80 GHz versus 3.30 GHz), more L2 cache per core (512 KB versus 256 KB), higher memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s), ECC memory support, a smaller 7 nm process node, and twice the transistor count (9,800 million versus not recorded for Intel).

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-10600 has 12 MB shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has only 4 MB shared L3 cache.

Q: What are the overall average benchmark scores?

A: The Intel part averages 2837, and the AMD part averages 2774. Both sit at the 51st percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the AMD processor wins?

A: No. The database records six Cinebench head-to-head comparisons, and the Intel Core i5-10600 wins all six. The AMD chip has no wins in the recorded head-to-head data.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-10600 wins in every direct benchmark comparison recorded in the database. Its 6-core, 12-thread design provides a 5.6% advantage in multi-core Cinebench R20 and R23 tests, making it the better choice for heavily threaded workloads such as video rendering, 3D modeling, or batch processing. The single-core results also favor Intel, with a 5.3% to 5.6% edge, indicating a slight advantage in lightly threaded tasks like web browsing or office productivity. The larger 12 MB L3 cache may also benefit workloads with frequently reused data.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G wins on architectural merits rather than benchmark scores. Its 7 nm process node and 9,800 million transistors suggest higher efficiency per watt, though no power consumption figures are recorded in the database. The 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth exceeds Intel's 42.7 GB/s, which could benefit memory-sensitive applications. ECC memory support makes it suitable for error-critical computing environments. The higher base clock of 3.80 GHz versus 3.30 GHz may help in short bursts of activity, though the Intel part's 4.80 GHz boost clock is substantially higher than the AMD's 4.00 GHz. The Radeon Vega 6 integrated graphics may offer different multimedia capabilities compared to Intel's UHD Graphics 630, though no graphics benchmarks are recorded.

For a user selecting strictly on measured Cinebench performance, the Intel Core i5-10600 is the clear pick. For a user prioritizing ECC support, memory bandwidth, or the newer fabrication process, the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G presents a legitimate alternative despite losing every recorded benchmark. The overall average scores (2837 versus 2774) show a narrow 2.3% gap, so the decision hinges on specific workload requirements and platform preferences rather than a dominant performance difference.