AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Intel Xeon E-2126G Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

CORE STATE Renoir
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.8 Base / 4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 4 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 2
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon E-2126G

CORE STATE Coffee Lake-S WS
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 6 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 80W
ARCHITECTURE Coffee Lake
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2018

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
936
896
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
132
126
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
3,900
3,734
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
550
527
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
9,287
8,891
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,311
1,255
geekbench_multicore
4,608
5,743
geekbench_singlecore
1,470
1,565

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Intel Xeon E-2126G

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G wins six of the eight head-to-head benchmark tests in the database, but the Intel Xeon E-2126G takes the two Geekbench tests by a wide margin. The recorded data shows a clear split: the AMD part dominates every Cinebench test, while the Intel part dominates every Geekbench test. Both CPUs sit at the 51st percentile among all CPUs in the database, yet their performance profiles could hardly be more different.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is the majority winner, taking 6 of 8 tests. Its cleanest sweep is in the Cinebench suite. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the AMD scores 9287 against the Intel's 8891, a 4.3% lead. In R23 single-core, the AMD scores 1311 against 1255, also a 4.3% lead. The R20 results follow the same pattern: 3900 versus 3734 in multicore (4.3%) and 550 versus 527 in single-core (4.2%). The R15 results are consistent: 936 versus 896 in multicore (4.3%) and 132 versus 126 in single-core (4.5%).

The Intel Xeon E-2126G answers with the two largest margins in the entire comparison. In Geekbench multicore, the Intel scores 5743 against the AMD's 4608, a 24.6% lead. In Geekbench single-core, the Intel scores 1565 against 1470, a 6.5% lead. The 24.6% Geekbench multicore margin is more than five times larger than any Cinebench margin in either direction.

The average benchmark scores reflect this split. The Intel averages 2842 across all recorded tests, while the AMD averages 2774. The Intel's average is pulled up by its Geekbench multicore result, while the AMD's average is more consistent across the Cinebench suite. Looking at nearest rivals, the Intel's 2842 average places it within 0.6% of the Intel Core i7-11370H (2861) and 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-6800K (2838). The AMD's 2774 average is essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-5930K (2775, 0% delta) and within 0.1% of the Intel Xeon D-1567 (2770).

The Verdict

The data points to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G as the better choice for Cinebench-style rendering workloads. It wins all six Cinebench tests with margins between 4.2% and 4.5%, and it does so with a lower TDP of 65W versus 80W. The AMD part is also still in active production, while the Intel part is end-of-life.

The Intel Xeon E-2126G is the better choice for Geekbench-style workloads. Its 24.6% multicore lead and 6.5% single-core lead are decisive, and its higher average benchmark score of 2842 versus 2774 reflects that strength. The Intel also has a higher boost clock at 4.50 GHz versus 4.00 GHz and more L3 cache at 12 MB versus 4 MB.

The choice depends on the workload. For rendering and multi-threaded Cinebench-style tasks, the AMD wins. For Geekbench-style general-purpose tasks, the Intel wins. The AMD's active production status and lower TDP make it the safer long-term pick for a desktop build, while the Intel's server/workstation segment and ECC support make it a candidate for workstation use.

Architecture Differences

The two CPUs represent different architectural generations and process nodes. The Intel Xeon E-2126G uses Coffee Lake architecture on a 14 nm process fabricated by Intel. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G uses Zen 2 architecture on a 7 nm process fabricated by TSMC. The process node difference is substantial: 7 nm versus 14 nm.

Core and thread counts differ in an interesting way. The Intel has 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning no simultaneous multithreading. The AMD has 4 cores and 8 threads, using simultaneous multithreading to double its thread count. Despite having fewer physical cores, the AMD matches or exceeds the Intel in every Cinebench test.

Cache architecture differs significantly. The Intel has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD has 4 MB of shared L3. The AMD compensates with 512 KB of L2 per core, double the Intel's 256 KB per core. Both have 64 KB of L1 per core.

The AMD die contains 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die, while the Intel die is 154 mm² with no recorded transistor count. The AMD's smaller process node allows it to pack more transistors into a similar die area.

Both CPUs support DDR4 memory with dual-channel buses, but the AMD has a higher memory bandwidth at 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s for the Intel. Both support ECC memory. Both use PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ: the Intel has HD Graphics P630, while the AMD has Radeon Vega 6. The Intel is classified as a Server/Workstation part, while the AMD is a Desktop part. The Intel was released on 2018-07-11 and is end-of-life; the AMD was released on 2020-07-20 and is active.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in the following recorded specifications:

  • Cores: 6 (Intel) versus 4 (AMD)
  • Threads: 6 (Intel) versus 8 (AMD)
  • Base clock: 3.30 GHz (Intel) versus 3.80 GHz (AMD)
  • Boost clock: 4.50 GHz (Intel) versus 4.00 GHz (AMD)
  • TDP: 80W (Intel) versus 65W (AMD)
  • Socket: Intel Socket 1151 versus AMD Socket AM4
  • Process node: 14 nm (Intel) versus 7 nm (AMD)
  • Foundry: Intel versus TSMC
  • L2 cache per core: 256 KB (Intel) versus 512 KB (AMD)
  • L3 cache: 12 MB shared (Intel) versus 4 MB shared (AMD)
  • Memory bandwidth: 42.7 GB/s (Intel) versus 51.2 GB/s (AMD)
  • Integrated graphics: HD Graphics P630 versus Radeon Vega 6
  • Market segment: Server/Workstation versus Desktop
  • Production status: End-of-life versus Active
  • Release date: 2018-07-11 versus 2020-07-20
  • Launch MSRP: $255 (Intel only; the AMD has no recorded launch MSRP)

FAQ

Q: Which CPU wins more head-to-head tests?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G wins 6 of 8 tests, including all six Cinebench tests. The Intel Xeon E-2126G wins the two Geekbench tests.

Q: How large is the Intel's Geekbench multicore lead?

A: The Intel scores 5743 versus 4608 for the AMD, a 24.6% margin. This is the largest single-test margin in the comparison.

Q: Does the AMD part have more threads despite fewer cores?

A: Yes. The AMD has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel has 6 cores and 6 threads. The AMD uses simultaneous multithreading.

Q: Which CPU has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD has 4 MB of shared L3. The AMD has 512 KB of L2 per core versus 256 KB per core on the Intel.

Q: Are both CPUs still in production?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is listed as Active, while the Intel Xeon E-2126G is End-of-life.

Q: Do both CPUs support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both support ECC memory. Both also support DDR4 with dual-channel buses, though the AMD has higher memory bandwidth at 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G wins in Cinebench rendering workloads. It leads by 4.3% in R23 multicore, 4.3% in R20 multicore, and 4.3% in R15 multicore. Single-core Cinebench margins are similar: 4.5% in R15, 4.2% in R20, and 4.3% in R23. The AMD also has a lower TDP at 65W versus 80W, a higher base clock at 3.80 GHz versus 3.30 GHz, and it is the active production part.

The Intel Xeon E-2126G wins in Geekbench workloads. Its 24.6% multicore lead and 6.5% single-core lead are the largest margins in the comparison. The Intel also has a higher average benchmark score at 2842 versus 2774, a higher boost clock at 4.50 GHz versus 4.00 GHz, and more L3 cache at 12 MB versus 4 MB.

For a desktop user running Cinebench-style rendering, the AMD is the pick. For a workstation user running Geekbench-style general-purpose tasks, the Intel is the pick. The Intel's server/workstation market segment and ECC support make it a candidate for workstation builds, while the AMD's active production status and lower TDP make it a safer long-term desktop choice.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
3 PRO 4350G
E-2126G
Core Specs
Cores
4
6 +50.0%
Threads
8
6 -25.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.8
3.3 -13.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4
4.5 +12.5%
Frequency (GHz)
3.8
3.3 -13.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4
4.5 +12.5%
Multiplier
38
33 -13.2%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB (shared)
12 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
80 +23.1%
PPT
61-88 W
Configurable TDP
45 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 2
Coffee Lake
Codename
Renoir
Coffee Lake-S WS
Generation
Ryzen 3 (Zen 2 (Renoir))
Xeon E (Coffee Lake)
Process Size
7 nm
14 nm
Transistors
9,800 million
Die Size
156 mm²
154 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
42.7 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM4
Intel Socket 1151
Chipsets
AMD 300 Series, AMD 400 Series, AMD 500 Series
C242, C246
PCIe
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Vega 6
HD Graphics P630
Other
Market
Desktop
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
End-of-life
Launch Price
$255
Part Number
100-000000148100-100000148MPK
SR3WU
Package
µOPGA-1331
FC-LGA14C
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
View Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G Details View Xeon E-2126G Details