AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Intel Xeon D-1577 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a remarkably consistent pattern across every Cinebench iteration: the Intel Xeon D-1577 wins all six head-to-head comparisons, though by margins so narrow they border on statistical noise. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Xeon scores 946 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G's 936, a 1.1% lead. The single-core R15 test tells the same story: 133 versus 132, a 0.8% advantage for Intel. These are not the kind of gaps that suggest a decisive performance hierarchy; they are the kind of gaps that could flip with silicon lottery or thermal variation.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the Xeon D-1577 again takes both tests. Multicore shows 3943 against 3900, and single-core shows 556 against 550, each a 1.1% margin. The R23 results mirror this exactly: 9389 versus 9287 in multicore, and 1325 versus 1311 in single-core, with the same 1.1% delta. What is striking here is the consistency of the percentage gap across all workloads. Whether the render is short, medium, or long, the Intel part holds a steady, if slim, edge.

The benchmark database also records Geekbench scores for the AMD chip only. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G posts 4608 in multicore and 1470 in single-core. Without a corresponding Intel Geekbench result in the head-to-head data, direct comparison on that workload is impossible. However, the Cinebench suite provides enough evidence to characterize the overall relationship: the Xeon leads everywhere, but never by more than 1.1%. This is a case where the larger core count of the Xeon (16 cores versus 4) does not translate into the multicore dominance one might expect, suggesting that the AMD's Zen 2 architecture is doing substantial work per clock to keep pace.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies and eras. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G uses the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Renoir, built on TSMC's 7 nm process. It integrates 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die. The Intel Xeon D-1577 uses the Broadwell architecture, specifically Broadwell-DE, on Intel's 14 nm node, with 3,200 million transistors on a 246 mm² die. The process node difference is stark: 7 nm versus 14 nm means AMD packs far more transistors into far less silicon area, which explains why the 4-core AMD part can compete with a 16-core Intel part in threaded workloads.

Cache hierarchies also diverge sharply. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G carries 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3. The Xeon D-1577 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 1.5 MB of L3 per core. While the AMD part has a smaller total L3 pool (4 MB shared versus potentially 24 MB aggregated across 16 cores, though the per-core figure is listed), the Xeon's L3 is distributed per core rather than pooled. This architectural choice favors the AMD part for workloads that benefit from a single, fast shared cache, while the Xeon's larger aggregate cache may help in heavily threaded scenarios with independent data streams.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD chip supports DDR4 only, in dual-channel configuration, with a measured memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR3 and DDR4, also dual-channel, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory, which is notable given that the Ryzen is a desktop part while the Xeon is explicitly a server/workstation chip.

The Xeon D-1577 offers 24 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G offers 16 lanes. This makes the Intel part more suitable for I/O-heavy server roles. The AMD part includes integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics; the Xeon has no integrated graphics at all. The Xeon is a BGA 1667 socket part, while the AMD uses Socket AM4, which is a significant platform compatibility difference.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Xeon D-1577 is the faster processor in every benchmark recorded, but the advantage is too small to declare a clear winner for most use cases. A 1.1% lead in Cinebench R23 multicore is not the kind of margin that justifies a platform choice by itself. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G, despite having a quarter of the Xeon's core count, nearly matches it in threaded performance. This suggests that per-core efficiency heavily favors AMD. For single-threaded work, the gap is similarly tiny, with the Xeon leading by 0.8% to 1.1% depending on the test version.

The Xeon's 16 cores and 32 threads give it more raw parallelism, but the benchmark results show that this parallelism does not translate into a proportional performance advantage. The Ryzen's 4 cores and 8 threads, running at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost of 4.00 GHz, appear to do more work per clock than the Xeon's 16 cores at a base of 1.30 GHz and boost of 2.10 GHz. If the workload can use many threads efficiently, the Xeon's higher core count might scale better beyond the tested Cinebench scenarios, but the recorded data does not show that scaling advantage in these specific tests.

For a desktop user, the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is the more sensible choice based on this data alone: it delivers nearly identical Cinebench results with integrated graphics, a modern 7 nm node, and a socket that allows future upgrades. For a server or workstation environment where ECC memory, 24 PCIe lanes, and a proven Broadwell platform matter, the Xeon D-1577 offers a slight performance edge and a launch MSRP of 1379. The verdict is not about raw speed; it is about platform fit.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores in the recorded data?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1577 has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Is the AMD chip faster in any benchmark?

A: No. The head-to-head data shows the Intel Xeon D-1577 winning all six recorded Cinebench tests, though by margins of only 0.8% to 1.1%.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is 1.1%, seen in Cinebench R15 multicore, R20 multicore, R20 single-core, R23 multicore, and R23 single-core. The smallest gap is 0.8% in Cinebench R15 single-core.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G and the Intel Xeon D-1577 list ECC memory support as true.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has integrated graphics, specifically Radeon Vega 6. The Intel Xeon D-1577 lists no integrated graphics.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is built on TSMC's 7 nm process, while the Intel Xeon D-1577 uses Intel's 14 nm process.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G wins in scenarios where per-core efficiency and modern architecture matter. Its 7 nm process and Zen 2 design deliver near-parity with a 16-core server chip while using far fewer cores. For desktop applications that rely on single-threaded responsiveness, such as everyday productivity or light content creation, the Ryzen's 4.00 GHz boost clock and 4 MB shared L3 cache provide a strong foundation. The integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics mean no separate GPU is required for basic display output, which is a significant advantage for compact or office builds. The data does not show the Ryzen winning any benchmark, but its performance per core is exceptional given the core count disparity.

The Intel Xeon D-1577 wins in every recorded benchmark, which gives it the nod for scenarios where even a 1.1% margin matters, such as competitive benchmarking or certified server workloads. Its 16 cores and 32 threads provide headroom for tasks that can scale beyond the 8 threads of the AMD part, even if the Cinebench tests do not fully capture that scaling. The 24 PCIe Gen 3 lanes make it better suited for systems with many NVMe drives or expansion cards. The support for both DDR3 and DDR4 memory, combined with ECC, makes it flexible for existing server infrastructure. The Xeon's 45 W TDP is also lower than the Ryzen's 65 W TDP, which is notable for dense server deployments where power per socket is a concern.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | Intel Xeon D-1577 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 4 | 16 |

| Threads | 8 | 32 |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 1.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel BGA 1667 |

| Architecture | Zen 2 | Broadwell |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 9,800 million | 3,200 million |

| Die Size | 156 mm² | 246 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB (shared) | 1.5 MB (per core) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3, DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe Lanes | Gen 3, 16 Lanes | Gen 3, 24 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 | None |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Server/Workstation |

| Release Date | 2020-07-20 | 2016-02-23 |

| Part Number | 100-000000148100-100000148MPK | SR2M2 |

The specification table highlights a generational split. The AMD part is a 2020 release built for desktop, while the Intel part is a 2016 server processor. The Xeon carries more cores and PCIe lanes, but the Ryzen counters with a smaller process node, higher clock speeds, and integrated graphics. Both support ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Xeon has a launch MSRP of 1379, while the Ryzen's launch price is not recorded in the database.