AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Intel Atom x7211RE Comparison

The benchmark data presents a stark contrast between the Intel Atom x7211RE and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. The Atom is a low-power mobile processor, while the Ryzen PRO is a desktop part, and their performance envelopes are separated by a wide margin. Across every shared benchmark, the AMD processor delivers scores that are multiples of the Intel chip's results, establishing a clear hierarchy in compute capability.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive victories for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G come in multi-threaded workloads, where its 4 cores and 8 threads overwhelm the Atom's 2 cores and 2 threads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD chip scores 9287, while the Intel Atom manages only 1804. This represents a delta of -80.6%, meaning the Ryzen PRO is approximately 5.1 times faster in this test. Similarly, in Cinebench R20 multi-core, the AMD processor scores 3900 compared to the Atom's 757, a delta of -80.6%. The data suggests that for any rendering or heavily parallelized task, the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is in a completely different performance class.

The gap narrows slightly but remains immense in single-threaded tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G scores 1311, while the Intel Atom x7211RE scores 254, a delta of -80.6%. This pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 single-core, with the AMD chip scoring 550 versus the Atom's 106, also a delta of -80.7%. While the Atom's boost clock of 3.20 GHz helps it close the relative gap compared to its base clock, it cannot overcome the fundamental architectural and clock speed advantages of the Ryzen chip, which boosts to 4.00 GHz.

The Cinebench R15 multi-core test provides a similar picture. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G scores 936, while the Intel Atom x7211RE scores 181, a delta of -80.7%. The consistency of the delta across all five shared benchmarks is notable. It indicates that the performance difference is not workload-specific but rather a systemic reflection of the two processors' core counts, memory bandwidth, and clock speeds. The Atom's higher average benchmark score of 2811 compared to the Ryzen's 2774 is misleading; it is based on a different and larger set of tests, including passmark data compression where the Atom scores 20820. In the directly comparable Cinebench tests, the AMD processor wins all five.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the head-to-head data, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G wins all five shared benchmark tests. This gives it a definitive 5-0 victory in this comparison. The wins are universal across both single-core and multi-core workloads, indicating that the Ryzen PRO is the superior choice for any task that relies on CPU processing power, from everyday application responsiveness to content creation.

The Intel Atom x7211RE does not win any of the benchmark tests that are directly comparable. However, its benchmark data from the wider suite suggests its strengths lie elsewhere. Its high passmark data compression score of 20820 is a standout figure, though it is not compared directly to the AMD chip. The data indicates that the Atom's performance profile is geared towards efficiency and specific tasks rather than raw compute throughput. Its low TDP of 6 watts, compared to the Ryzen's 65 watts, suggests it is designed for fanless or passively cooled systems where power consumption is the primary constraint. The Atom's wins would be in scenarios where the Ryzen PRO cannot be used at all due to power or thermal limits, not in direct benchmark competition.

The AMD processor also benefits from its dual-channel memory bus, which provides a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, compared to the Atom's single-channel 38.4 GB/s. This difference directly impacts memory-intensive tasks and contributes to the Ryzen's superior performance in multi-threaded benchmarks. While the Atom has a larger L3 cache at 6 MB shared versus the Ryzen's 4 MB shared, the Ryzen's faster clocks and higher core count render this cache advantage irrelevant in the benchmark results.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is the significantly more powerful processor. For users who require CPU performance for tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the Ryzen PRO is the only choice from this comparison. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9287 is over five times higher than the Atom's 1804, indicating a massive difference in sustained multi-threaded performance. Anyone building a desktop system with a focus on processing power should select the AMD part.

The Intel Atom x7211RE is not a competitor in this performance segment. Its appeal lies in its extreme power efficiency, with a TDP of just 6 watts. It is suitable for embedded systems, industrial PCs, or lightweight mobile devices where low power draw and passive cooling are paramount. The data suggests that the Atom's performance is sufficient for basic tasks, but it will struggle with demanding applications. The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G, despite its 65-watt TDP, offers a performance-per-watt that is vastly superior in absolute terms, delivering several times the performance for roughly ten times the power budget. The choice is clear: pick the Ryzen for performance, and the Atom only when power constraints are non-negotiable.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G in multi-core performance?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD scores 9287, which is 80.6% higher than the Intel Atom x7211RE's 1804. This translates to the Ryzen being about five times faster in this specific benchmark.

Q: Does the Intel Atom x7211RE win any of the direct comparison benchmarks?

A: No. The head-to-head data shows the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G winning all five shared tests, including both single-core and multi-core Cinebench benchmarks.

Q: What is the difference in power consumption between the two processors?

A: The Intel Atom x7211RE has a TDP of 6 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has a TDP of 65 watts. This makes the Atom far more suitable for power-constrained or passively cooled environments.

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Atom x7211RE's boost clock of 3.20 GHz. The AMD chip also has a much higher base clock at 3.80 GHz versus 1.00 GHz.

Q: How do their memory bandwidth capabilities compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G supports dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel Atom x7211RE supports single-channel memory with a bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s.

Q: Are these processors from the same generation?

A: No. The Intel Atom x7211RE is based on the Amston Lake architecture and was released in 2024, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is based on the Zen 2 (Renoir) architecture and was released in 2020.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Atom x7211RE is built on a 10 nm process by Intel and uses the Amston Lake architecture with Gracemont efficiency cores. In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is built on a 7 nm process by TSMC and uses the Zen 2 architecture. This process advantage gives the AMD chip a higher transistor density, with 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die. The Atom's transistor count and die size are not listed in the data.

The core configuration is also a major differentiator. The Atom has 2 cores and 2 threads, while the Ryzen PRO has 4 cores and 8 threads, allowing for simultaneous multithreading. The cache hierarchies differ as well: the Atom has a larger L3 cache of 6 MB shared, but the Ryzen PRO has a larger L2 cache of 512 KB per core, and a smaller L3 cache of 4 MB shared. The L1 cache also differs, with the Atom having 96 KB per core and the Ryzen having 64 KB per core.

The integrated graphics are another key difference. The Atom features UHD Graphics 16EU, while the Ryzen PRO includes a more capable Radeon Vega 6. The AMD processor also supports ECC memory, a feature not available on the Intel chip. The Ryzen PRO's memory bus is dual-channel, while the Atom's is single-channel, and the Ryzen supports a higher memory bandwidth. The PCIe configurations also differ, with the Atom offering 9 lanes of Gen 3 and the Ryzen offering 16 lanes of Gen 3.

Specification Differences

The most obvious specification difference is the core and thread count. The Intel Atom x7211RE has 2 cores and 2 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has 4 cores and 8 threads.

The clock speeds are vastly different. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The Intel Atom x7211RE has a base clock of 1.00 GHz and a boost clock of 3.20 GHz.

The TDP is a major point of separation. The Intel Atom x7211RE has a TDP of 6 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has a TDP of 65 watts.

The memory support differs: the AMD chip supports only DDR4, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD chip has a dual-channel memory bus, while the Intel chip has a single-channel bus. The memory bandwidth is higher on the AMD chip at 51.2 GB/s versus the Intel's 38.4 GB/s.

The socket types are incompatible. The Intel Atom x7211RE uses Intel BGA 1264, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G uses AMD Socket AM4. The market segment also differs, with the Atom being for mobile devices and the Ryzen PRO for desktops. The Intel Atom has a launch MSRP of $42, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has no launch MSRP listed.