AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 vs Intel Core i3-9100TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher base clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 has a base clock of 3.10 GHz, compared to the Intel Core i3-9100TE's 2.20 GHz. The AMD part also boosts higher, reaching 3.40 GHz versus 3.20 GHz on the Intel.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i3-9100TE and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 list ECC memory support as a feature. Both also use DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: Which CPU includes integrated graphics?

A: Only the Intel Core i3-9100TE includes integrated graphics, specifically the UHD Graphics 630. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 has no integrated graphics unit listed.

Q: How do the two compare in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 scores 4767 points, while the Intel Core i3-9100TE scores 3900 points. This gives AMD an 18.2% lead in that specific test.

Q: What is the difference in their average benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core i3-9100TE has an average benchmark score of 1386, placing it in the 37th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 has an average score of 1379, placing it in the 36th percentile. The scores are nearly identical, with a difference of only 7 points.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel Core i3-9100TE does not.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data presents a clear and consistent picture across all six head-to-head tests: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 wins every single comparison. The Intel Core i3-9100TE fails to secure a win in any of the Cinebench R15, R20, or R23 benchmarks, whether testing single-core or multi-core performance.

The AMD processor's dominance is not marginal. In the multi-core tests, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 leads by margins of 18.1% in Cinebench R15, 18.2% in Cinebench R20, and 18.2% in Cinebench R23. The single-core results tell a similar story, with AMD leading by 17.9% in R15, 18.1% in R20, and 18.3% in R23. This consistent margin across different workload types and rendering engines suggests a fundamental performance advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.

For users prioritizing raw compute throughput in rendering or CPU-bound tasks, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is the clear choice. The Intel Core i3-9100TE's only potential advantage lies in its integrated UHD Graphics 630, which allows for a system to operate without a discrete GPU. That said, the data shows no benchmark scenario where the Intel part outperforms the AMD part in CPU-centric tests.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Core i3-9100TE is built on the Coffee Lake architecture, specifically from the Coffee Lake Refresh generation, and uses a 14 nm process node manufactured by Intel. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is based on the Zen architecture, codenamed Summit Ridge, and is also built on a 14 nm node, but manufactured by GlobalFoundries.

The physical characteristics differ substantially. The Intel die size is 126 mm², while the AMD die is significantly larger at 213 mm². The AMD processor also lists a transistor count of 4,800 million, while the Intel part does not provide this figure in the data. The Intel chip uses the Socket 1151 interface, while the AMD chip uses Socket AM4.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The Intel Core i3-9100TE has 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 cache per core, with 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 has a larger 96 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, with 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This larger cache allocation on the AMD side may contribute to its performance advantage, though the data does not provide direct causality.

The Intel processor includes integrated UHD Graphics 630, while the AMD part has no integrated graphics. Both support ECC memory and provide PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, whereas the Intel part is locked.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i3-9100TE | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 2.20 GHz | 3.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.20 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Coffee Lake | Zen |

| Generation | Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh) | Ryzen 3 (Zen Summit Ridge) |

| Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |

| Die Size | 126 mm² | 213 mm² |

| Transistors | Not listed | 4,800 million |

| L1 Cache (per core) | 64 KB | 96 KB |

| L2 Cache (per core) | 256 KB | 512 KB |

| L3 Cache (shared) | 6 MB | 8 MB |

| Memory Bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | 4256 MB/s |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | None |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Launch MSRP | $122 | Not listed |

The clock speed differences are substantial. The AMD part runs at a base clock 0.90 GHz higher than the Intel part, and its boost clock is 0.20 GHz higher. The TDP difference is notable: the Intel chip is rated at 35 W, while the AMD chip is rated at 65 W, meaning the Intel part draws significantly less power. The memory bandwidth figures are listed differently in the data, with Intel at 38.4 GB/s and AMD at 4256 MB/s, which are not directly comparable as units.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results are unambiguous. In the Cinebench R15 multi-core test, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 scores 480 points against the Intel Core i3-9100TE's 393 points, a delta of -18.1% for the Intel part. The single-core R15 test shows AMD winning 67 to 55, a -17.9% gap.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the AMD processor scores 2002 points in multi-core versus 1638 for Intel, again an -18.2% delta. In single-core R20, AMD's 282 points beat Intel's 231 points by -18.1%.

The Cinebench R23 results continue the trend. Multi-core shows AMD at 4767 points and Intel at 3900 points, a -18.2% difference. Single-core R23 has AMD at 673 points versus Intel's 550 points, the largest single-core gap at -18.3%.

The consistency of these results is striking. Across all three Cinebench versions and both single-core and multi-core tests, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 maintains a lead of roughly 18%. This uniformity suggests the performance gap is structural, likely stemming from the higher clock speeds and larger cache hierarchy of the AMD part.

The Intel Core i3-9100TE also has Geekbench scores listed: 3214 multi-core and 1105 single-core. The AMD processor does not have Geekbench results in the head-to-head data, so a direct comparison on that benchmark cannot be made from this fact pack.

The Verdict

The data leads to a straightforward conclusion: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 outperforms the Intel Core i3-9100TE in every measured CPU benchmark. The margin is consistent at approximately 18% across both single-core and multi-core workloads, regardless of the Cinebench version used. For users whose primary concern is processing power, the AMD part is the superior choice.

The Intel Core i3-9100TE does have specific attributes that may matter in certain system builds. Its 35 W TDP makes it a lower-power option, and its integrated UHD Graphics 630 eliminates the need for a separate graphics card in basic systems. The Intel part is also listed as end-of-life, while the AMD processor is still active in production.

The average benchmark scores are nearly identical—1386 for Intel versus 1379 for AMD—which places both in the same performance tier overall. However, the head-to-head benchmarks tell a different story, with AMD winning all six comparisons decisively. The AMD processor's unlocked multiplier also offers overclocking potential that the locked Intel part cannot match.

For a build requiring integrated graphics or minimal power draw, the Intel Core i3-9100TE is the only option of the two. For any workload that benefits from raw CPU throughput, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is clearly the better performer based on the benchmark evidence. The choice ultimately depends on whether the system needs the Intel's iGPU and lower TDP, or the AMD's superior compute performance and overclocking headroom.