AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 Specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 features 4 physical cores and 4 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
3 PRO 1200 Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
AMD's Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the 3 PRO 1200 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Zen Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is built on AMD's 14 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in 3 PRO 1200 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Zen Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
3 PRO 1200 Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 65W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
AMD Socket AM4 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 uses the AMD Socket AM4 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
AMD Socket AM4 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the 3 PRO 1200 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.
Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 Benchmark Scores
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource
Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. Higher scores mean faster render times in professional applications.
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 handles tasks that can't be parallelized across multiple cores. Games and many desktop applications still rely heavily on single-thread performance.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource
Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource
Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 after thermal limits kick in.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 maintains boost clocks under continuous load.
About AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is a 4-core, 4-thread desktop processor built on the Zen architecture, fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It operates with a base clock of 3.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.40 GHz, and its benchmark results place it in the 37th percentile of all CPUs tested, indicating a modest entry-level position in the current landscape. The data shows a processor that is consistent in its performance tier, matching the average score of its closest rivals almost exactly.
Benchmark Performance
The Cinebench results for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 illustrate a clear performance profile across different rendering workloads. In Cinebench R15, the processor scores 480 points in multi-core and 67 points in single-core. Moving to Cinebench R20, the scores rise to 2002 multi-core and 282 single-core. The most recent Cinebench R23 results show 4767 points in multi-core and 673 points in single-core. These scores, taken together, yield an average benchmark score of 1379, which places the chip at the 37th percentile of all CPUs in the database.
Interpreting these numbers relative to the competition, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and the AMD Opteron 6366 HE, both of which have an identical average score of 1379, representing a 0% delta. The Intel Core i7-2600K is marginally ahead with an average score of 1380, a delta of -0.1% relative to the Ryzen, while the Intel Core i7-3615QE scores 1381, a -0.2% delta. This indicates that the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is not meaningfully slower or faster than any of its nearest rivals; the performance differences are within a negligible margin of error. The multi-core scores, particularly in Cinebench R23, suggest that the four physical cores without simultaneous multithreading deliver predictable scaling, but the processor struggles to differentiate itself in a crowded field of similarly performing parts.
Power and Thermals
The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 carries a TDP class of 65 watts, which is a standard figure for mainstream desktop processors of its generation. This TDP rating, combined with the 14 nm process node and a die size of 213 mm², implies that a capable air cooler should be sufficient for maintaining reasonable operating temperatures under sustained load. The 65-watt envelope is not particularly demanding, and the data does not indicate any exotic cooling requirements. For system builders, this means the processor can be paired with modest cooling solutions without concern, though the absence of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output. The thermal behavior, inferred from the TDP class, suggests that the chip will not create excessive heat buildup in compact chassis, but the lack of detailed thermal test data means precise temperature curves cannot be derived from this fact pack.
Platform and Compatibility
The Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is designed for the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which provides a clear upgrade path within the same motherboard family. It supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 4256 MB/s, and includes ECC memory support, a feature often relevant for entry-level workstations or systems where data integrity is prioritized. The processor provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single discrete graphics card or a couple of NVMe drives, though the lane count limits extensive multi-GPU setups. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, which can extract additional performance beyond the stock boost clock of 3.40 GHz. The production status is listed as Active, meaning the chip is still in the market as of the data's recording, and its release date is June 28, 2017. The part number is YD120BBBM4KAE, and the processor itself contains 4,800 million transistors on a 213 mm² die.
Who Should Consider It
Based on the benchmark scores, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is suited for workloads that do not demand high thread counts. In single-core tasks, its Cinebench R23 score of 673 is modest, which means applications that rely heavily on single-threaded performance, such as older games or lightly threaded productivity software, will see only adequate responsiveness. Multi-core workloads, as reflected in the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 4767, show that the processor can handle basic content creation tasks like photo editing or light video rendering, but it will lag behind processors with more cores or simultaneous multithreading. For office productivity, the four threads are sufficient for document editing, spreadsheet work, and web browsing, but the 37th percentile ranking suggests it is not a top performer even in that category. Gamers building a budget system with a discrete GPU might find the processor acceptable for esports titles, but the single-core scores indicate that CPU-bound scenarios could bottleneck modern AAA games. The ECC memory support and AM4 socket make it a candidate for entry-level servers or homelab setups where reliability is more important than raw speed.
How It Compares
Against the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is perfectly matched in average score at 1379, with a 0% delta. The 2300U is a mobile part, so the comparison highlights that the desktop chip offers no performance advantage over a lower-power laptop processor, which may be surprising given the different thermal envelopes.
The AMD Opteron 6366 HE also matches the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 with an average score of 1379 and a 0% delta. This is a server-class processor from an older generation, and its equivalence in score suggests that the Ryzen's architectural efficiency compensates for the Opteron's higher core count, though the fact pack does not disclose the Opteron's specifications to confirm this.
The Intel Core i7-2600K is 0.1% ahead with an average score of 1380. This is a negligible difference, and it is notable that a processor from 2011 can still match a 2017 release in average benchmark performance, underscoring the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200's limited generational improvement in this segment.
The Intel Core i7-3615QE leads the group by 0.2% with an average score of 1381. Again, the delta is minuscule, and the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 effectively ties with this mobile quad-core, reinforcing the notion that its performance is squarely within a well-established plateau.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The split between single-thread and multi-thread scores reveals a processor that is consistent but not exceptional in either domain. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score of 673 is roughly 14% of the multi-core score of 4767, which aligns with expectations for a 4-core, 4-thread part without hyper-threading. The ratio indicates that scaling from one core to four cores is nearly linear, as the absence of simultaneous multithreading avoids the diminishing returns seen in some architectures. However, the absolute single-thread score is low, which means that the processor will feel sluggish in tasks that cannot leverage multiple cores, such as spreadsheet recalculation or certain legacy applications. Conversely, the multi-core score of 4767 shows that when a workload can use all four cores, the processor delivers a reasonable amount of throughput for its class, though it remains behind more modern designs. The data implies that users should prioritize multi-threaded applications for this chip, as its single-thread performance is a weaker point relative to its multi-core capability.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200?
A: The average benchmark score is 1379, which places it in the 37th percentile of all CPUs.
Q: How does the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 compare to the Intel Core i7-2600K?
A: The Intel Core i7-2600K has an average score of 1380, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200's 1379, indicating a negligible performance difference.
Q: Does the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 support ECC memory?
A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed as true for this processor.
Q: What is the TDP of the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200, and what does it imply for cooling?
A: The TDP is 65 watts, which implies that a standard air cooler should be adequate for typical operation.
Q: What is the boost clock speed of the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200?
A: The boost clock speed is 3.40 GHz, with a base clock of 3.10 GHz.
Q: Is the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 multiplier unlocked for overclocking?
A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for manual overclocking within the platform's limits.
The Intel Equivalent of Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i3-7120T offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.
Popular AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 Comparisons
See how the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs