AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How do their boost clocks compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE boosts up to 4.20 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE boosts up to 5.20 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE supports only DDR4.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: Yes. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE includes Radeon Vega 6, and the Intel Core 5 213PTE includes UHD Graphics 730.

Q: Which processor has a higher PCIe generation?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE supports PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has a TDP of 35 W, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has a TDP of 45 W.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE is built on TSMC's 7 nm process node and uses the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename. It belongs to the 5000 series and fits the AMD Socket AM4. The chip packs 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. Its cache layout includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The memory path is dual-channel DDR4 with a measured bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. The integrated graphics solution is Radeon Vega 6.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process and uses the Bartlett Lake codename, classified under Core 5 generation. It requires Intel Socket 1700. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 is 2 MB per core, and L3 is 24 MB shared. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with a higher memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. This part supports ECC memory, which the AMD chip does not. Integrated graphics come as UHD Graphics 730. The Intel processor also uses PCIe Gen 5, whereas the AMD chip is limited to Gen 3.

The transistor count and die size for the Intel part are not recorded in the database, so a direct comparison on those physical metrics is unavailable. What the data does show is a clear generational split: the AMD chip uses a smaller process node and an older PCIe standard, while the Intel chip offers a wider memory interface in terms of supported standards and higher bandwidth. The AMD chip includes an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel chip does not, meaning the AMD part is positioned for overclocking flexibility despite its lower core count.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 213PTE has recorded benchmark data across Cinebench and Passmark tests, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has no benchmark scores in the database. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison one-sided, but the Intel results can be interpreted against its nearest rivals to establish performance context.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 21751. Its single-core score is 3070. In Cinebench R20, it scores 9135 multi-core and 1289 single-core. Cinebench R15 results show 2192 multi-core and 309 single-core. These scores place the Intel part at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 32924.

The nearest rivals confirm the Intel chip's competitive position. The Intel Core i7-12700 has an average score of 32942, which is 0.1% higher than the Core 5 213PTE. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33079, a 0.5% advantage, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G scores 33089, also a 0.5% advantage. This means the Core 5 213PTE sits within half a percent of all four rivals, effectively matching them in aggregate performance.

Passmark results show the Intel processor's strengths in specific workloads. The multithread score is 25590, single-thread is 3718, integer math reaches 93109, and floating point math hits 71722. Data compression scores 261083, data encryption scores 14413, extended instructions score 16146, and random string sorting scores 30106. Physics score is 2199, and find prime numbers score is 157.

Because the AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has no benchmark entries, the database records zero wins for it and one-sided data for the Intel part. The only quantitative comparison available is that the Intel chip has recorded scores and a 33-percentile advantage over the AMD chip, which sits at the 50th percentile versus the Intel part's 83rd percentile. The AMD chip's average benchmark score is recorded as 0, reflecting the absence of test data rather than a literal performance result.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification field. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE offers 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE doubles that with 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks differ significantly: the AMD chip runs at 3.60 GHz, while the Intel chip runs at 2.10 GHz. Boost clocks reverse the order, with the AMD chip at 4.20 GHz and the Intel chip at 5.20 GHz.

TDP values differ by 10 W, with the AMD chip at 35 W and the Intel chip at 45 W. The sockets are incompatible: AMD uses Socket AM4, Intel uses Socket 1700. Process nodes differ as well, with AMD on 7 nm and Intel on 10 nm. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel chip is locked.

Cache hierarchies are substantially different. The AMD chip has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB L3. The Intel chip has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support favors the Intel chip with both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD chip is limited to DDR4. Memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s for AMD and 76.8 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory is supported only on the Intel chip.

PCIe capabilities also differ: AMD provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well, with Radeon Vega 6 on the AMD side and UHD Graphics 730 on the Intel side. The production status for both is Active. The AMD release date is recorded as 2025-02-23, while the Intel release date is 2026-03-08. The Intel launch MSRP is $221, and the AMD launch MSRP is not listed in the database. The AMD part number is 100-000001805, and the Intel part number is SA4QM.

The Verdict

The recorded data offers only one side of the comparison. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a full set of benchmark scores, a 83rd percentile ranking, and an average score of 32924. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE has no benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0. From the data alone, the Intel part is the only one with measurable performance evidence.

The Intel chip also leads on paper specifications: double the cores and threads, a higher boost clock, more L3 cache, faster memory bandwidth, support for DDR5 and ECC, and PCIe Gen 5. The AMD chip counters with a lower TDP, a smaller process node, a higher base clock, and an unlocked multiplier. The lower TDP suggests the AMD chip is designed for power-constrained systems, while the Intel chip targets raw throughput.

The nearest rival data reinforces that the Intel Core 5 213PTE performs like a mid-range to upper-mid-range desktop processor. Its scores sit within 0.5% of the Intel Core i7-12700, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G. None of those rivals are entry-level parts, which places the Intel chip in a performance tier well above the AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE based on the available evidence.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins in every benchmark category with recorded data. Multi-threaded workloads are its clear strength, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21751 and the Passmark multithread score of 25590. Content creation tasks that scale with cores and threads, such as rendering, video encoding, and scientific computation, would favor the Intel chip given its 8 cores and 16 threads. The high boost clock of 5.20 GHz also supports strong single-thread performance, reflected in the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3070 and the Passmark single-thread score of 3718.

The AMD Ryzen 3 5305GE wins in power efficiency. Its 35 W TDP is 10 W lower than the Intel chip, making it the better fit for small-form-factor or low-power builds. The smaller 7 nm process node and lower base clock support that efficiency profile. The unlocked multiplier gives it an advantage for users who want overclocking options, a feature the Intel chip lacks. The AMD chip also carries a lower base clock but a higher base clock relative to its own boost behavior, which may reduce latency in lightly threaded tasks.

For memory flexibility, the Intel chip wins with DDR4 and DDR5 support and higher bandwidth. For ECC environments, the Intel chip is the only option. For PCIe bandwidth, the Intel chip's Gen 5 support is a clear lead. The AMD chip remains viable for builds prioritizing low power draw and overclocking on an AM4 platform, but the performance data in the database is entirely on the Intel side.