AMD Ryzen 3 5305G vs Intel Core 7 253PTE Comparison
AMD Ryzen 3 5305G
Core 7 253PTE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 3 5305G vs Intel Core 7 253PTE
# Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Intel Core 7 253PTE dominates the comparison with the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G across every measurable workload, but the two processors occupy very different performance tiers. The Ryzen 3 5305G has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, while the Intel part carries a complete suite of Cinebench and PassMark results. This asymmetry means the comparison rests on what the Intel Core 7 253PTE delivers and what the Ryzen 3 5305G cannot match based on its core configuration and clock profile.
The Intel Core 7 253PTE posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,276, which places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its single-core R23 result of 3,003 confirms strong per-thread performance, a figure that aligns with its 5.40 GHz boost clock. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score reaches 8,935 and single-core lands at 1,261, while the older R15 test shows 2,144 multi-core and 302 single-core. These results indicate consistent scaling across Cinebench generations, with the multi-core advantage growing as the test becomes more demanding.
PassMark results reinforce the Intel part's capability. The multi-thread score of 25,031 and single-thread score of 3,794 show a processor that handles both parallel and serial workloads effectively. Data compression reaches 275,828, floating point math hits 67,209, and integer math scores 119,552. Extended instructions deliver 17,099, while random string sorting produces 28,227. The physics test yields 1,318, and prime number finding scores 82. Data encryption completes at 15,500.
The Ryzen 3 5305G offers no benchmark entries in the database, so its measured performance cannot be stated. What the data does show is a fundamental difference in resource allocation. The Intel part has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD part has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel part boosts to 5.40 GHz, the AMD part to 4.20 GHz. These specifications alone suggest the Intel part will outperform, but the database only records actual measurements for the Intel side. The percentile comparison confirms the gap: Intel sits at the 84th percentile, AMD at the 50th.
# Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 7 253PTE wins every category where data exists. Multi-threaded workloads benefit from 10 cores and 20 threads, which explains the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,276. Single-threaded performance benefits from the 5.40 GHz boost clock, producing a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,003 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,794. Memory-intensive operations gain from 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and support for both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD part is limited to DDR4 at 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part also supports ECC memory, which the AMD part does not.
The Ryzen 3 5305G has no recorded wins because no benchmark scores exist for it. Its advantage lies in specifications rather than measurements. The 65 W TDP matches a standard desktop profile, while the Intel part runs at 45 W despite having more cores and a higher boost clock. The AMD part uses a 7 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own foundry. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, while the Intel part is locked. The AMD part integrates Radeon Vega 6 graphics, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. Neither integrated GPU has benchmark data in the database, so their relative performance cannot be quantified.
For use cases, the data points toward the Intel part for any workload that scales with cores or threads. Rendering, compiling, and scientific computing would benefit from the 20 threads and the 33 MB shared L3 cache. The PassMark floating point score of 67,209 and integer score of 119,552 indicate strong math throughput. The AMD part, with 4 cores and 8 threads, would logically suit lighter workloads, but the database provides no measurements to confirm this. The AMD part's 4.00 GHz base clock and 4.20 GHz boost clock suggest reasonable single-thread performance, but without scores, any claim remains speculative.
# Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G uses Zen 3 architecture on the Cezanne codename, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The Intel Core 7 253PTE uses Bartlett Lake codename with a 10 nm process at Intel, though the database lists no transistor count or die size for the Intel part.
Cache configurations diverge significantly. The AMD part provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's larger L3 cache, combined with more cores, suggests better handling of data sets that exceed the AMD part's 8 MB L3 capacity.
Memory support differs in both type and bandwidth. The AMD part supports only DDR4 with dual-channel access at 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, at 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part's bandwidth advantage of 38.4 GB/s over the AMD part comes directly from the recorded figures. ECC memory support exists only on the Intel part, which matters for reliability-focused builds.
PCIe capabilities also differ. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. This affects potential expansion bandwidth for GPUs and storage. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, while the Intel part is locked. The AMD part uses Socket AM4, the Intel part uses Socket 1700, so they are physically incompatible. Process nodes differ at 7 nm versus 10 nm, though the Intel part compensates with higher boost clocks and more cores.
# FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has 4 cores and 8 threads.
Q: What is the single-core performance difference based on Cinebench R23?
A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE scores 3,003 in Cinebench R23 single-core. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has no recorded Cinebench R23 score in the database.
Q: Does the Intel Core 7 253PTE support ECC memory?
A: Yes, the Intel Core 7 253PTE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G does not support ECC memory.
Q: Which processor has higher memory bandwidth?
A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE has 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part also supports DDR5 in addition to DDR4, while the AMD part only supports DDR4.
Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?
A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G boosts to 4.20 GHz. The base clocks are 1.80 GHz for Intel and 4.00 GHz for AMD.
Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G uses Radeon Vega 6 graphics, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE uses UHD Graphics 730. The database contains no benchmark scores for either integrated GPU, so their relative performance cannot be stated from the recorded data.
# Specification Differences
The two processors differ in every major specification category except market segment and production status, both listed as Desktop and Active respectively.
| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 5305G | Intel Core 7 253PTE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 10 |
| Threads | 8 | 20 |
| Base Clock | 4.00 GHz | 1.80 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 4.20 GHz | 5.40 GHz |
| TDP | 65 W | 45 W |
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Codename | Cezanne | Bartlett Lake |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |
| Transistors | 10,700 million | Not recorded |
| Die Size | 180 mm² | Not recorded |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 2 MB per core |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 33 MB shared |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| ECC Memory | No | Yes |
| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |
| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $384 |
The Intel part also has a later release date, 2026-03-08, compared to the AMD part's 2025-02-23. The Intel part carries part number SA4QK, while the AMD part uses 100-000001802. The Intel part has an average benchmark score of 34,962 and sits at the 84th percentile, while the AMD part has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile.
# The Verdict
The data supports selecting the Intel Core 7 253PTE for workloads that demand parallel processing and high throughput. Its 10 cores and 20 threads produce a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,276, and its PassMark multi-thread score of 25,031 confirms strong scaling. The 33 MB shared L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth provide ample resources for data-heavy tasks. The 5.40 GHz boost clock delivers a single-thread score of 3,003 in Cinebench R23 and 3,794 in PassMark, making it suitable for both threaded and single-threaded applications. ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation uses. The 45 W TDP achieves this with lower power draw than the AMD part's 65 W, though the Intel part is locked against overclocking.
The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has no measured performance in the database, so its selection must rest on specifications alone. The 4.00 GHz base clock and 4.20 GHz boost clock on 4 cores and 8 threads indicate a modest desktop processor. The 7 nm process from TSMC and 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die suggest efficient manufacturing. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, which the Intel part does not permit. The 65 W TDP fits a standard desktop power envelope. The AMD part uses the AM4 socket, which may be relevant for existing platform compatibility, though the database records no benchmarks to validate performance claims.
For users who prioritize measured performance, the Intel Core 7 253PTE is the only option with recorded data. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i7-13800H at a 0.1% lower average score and the Intel Core i9-12900HX also at 0.1% lower, while the Intel Xeon 6349P and AMD Ryzen 5 150 sit 0.2% higher. This places the Intel Core 7 253PTE in strong company. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G, without benchmarks or rivals, cannot be positioned relative to any measured processor. The choice comes down to whether unmeasured specifications or confirmed benchmark results carry more weight, and the database records only one side with actual scores.