AMD Ryzen 3 5305G vs Intel Core 5 211TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the base and boost clock speeds?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. The Intel Core 5 211TE has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G supports PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel configuration and a maximum bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 211TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a maximum bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has ECC memory support?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G is fabricated on a 7 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 5 211TE is fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel.

The Verdict

The recorded data in the database provides a clear picture. The Intel Core 5 211TE holds a significant performance advantage across every benchmark metric included in the dataset. Its average benchmark score of 15370 places it in the 69th percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile.

For workloads that depend on multi-threaded throughput, such as rendering, data compression, or scientific computation, the Intel Core 5 211TE is the clear choice. Its 10 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 20 MB shared L3 cache, deliver scores that the 4-core, 8-thread AMD part cannot approach. The Cinebench R23 multicore result alone shows a score of 12201 for the Intel part.

For users prioritizing single-thread performance, the Intel Core 5 211TE also leads. Its boost clock of 4.80 GHz yields a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1722, whereas the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The AMD processor's lower boost clock of 4.20 GHz and smaller L3 cache (8 MB) suggest a narrower performance envelope across both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks.

The Intel Core 5 211TE also offers broader platform features. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, ECC memory, a higher memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and PCIe Gen 5. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G supports only DDR4, no ECC, a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and PCIe Gen 3. The AMD part does have an unlocked multiplier, which allows overclocking, a capability the Intel part lacks.

The decision is straightforward from the data. The Intel Core 5 211TE is the stronger processor for essentially every measured workload category. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G, with no recorded benchmark scores and a smaller core count, appears best suited for scenarios where the unlocked multiplier and AMD Socket AM4 platform compatibility are the primary requirements.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. However, the Intel Core 5 211TE has 17 recorded benchmark scores, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has none. This absence of data for the AMD part means all comparative analysis must rely on the Intel processor's recorded metrics and the architectural characteristics of the AMD part.

The Intel Core 5 211TE shows strong performance in Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it scores 1229 points, and in single-core it scores 173. The Cinebench R20 results show 5124 points in multicore and 723 points in single-core. The Cinebench R23 results show 12201 points in multicore and 1722 points in single-core.

PassMark tests further document the Intel processor's capabilities. The data compression test yields a score of 133434, while data encryption scores 7231. Extended instructions score 8615, and the find prime numbers test scores 72. Floating point math scores 26150, integer math scores 33991, and the multithread test scores 11685. Physics scores 1278, random string sorting scores 14838, and single-thread performance scores 1408.

The nearest rivals in the database for the Intel Core 5 211TE provide context for its standing. The AMD EPYC 7543 has an average score of 15477, which is 0.7% higher than the Intel part. The AMD EPYC 7702P scores 15130, which is 1.6% lower. The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U scores 15682, which is 2% higher. The Intel Core i3-1315U scores 15022, which is 2.3% lower. These comparisons show the Core 5 211TE positioned within a tight cluster of competitive desktop and mobile processors, with deltas ranging from -2% to +2.3% relative to its nearest rivals.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 4.00 GHz for the AMD part and 1.70 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clocks are 4.20 GHz for the AMD part and 4.80 GHz for the Intel part.

Thermal design power differs as well. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel part delivers more cores and a higher boost clock while drawing less thermal headroom according to the recorded TDP figures.

Cache configurations are substantially different. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 211TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support diverges. The AMD part supports only DDR4, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s for the AMD part and 76.8 GB/s for the Intel part. ECC memory is not supported on the AMD part but is supported on the Intel part.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel Core 5 211TE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

The sockets are incompatible. The AMD part uses AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

The multiplier is unlocked on the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has a locked multiplier.

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD part uses Radeon Vega 6, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730.

The release dates differ slightly. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G was released on 2025-02-23, and the Intel Core 5 211TE was released on 2025-01-12.

The Intel Core 5 211TE has a launch MSRP of $221.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G belongs to the 5000 series and is built on the Zen 3 architecture with the codename Cezanne. It is fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC and contains 10,700 million transistors on a die size of 180 mm². The generation is listed as Ryzen 3 (Zen 3 (Cezanne)).

The Intel Core 5 211TE is built on the Bartlett Lake codename with the generation listed as Core 5 (Bartlett Lake). It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 215 mm². The transistor count is not recorded in the database.

The cache hierarchy reflects different design philosophies. The AMD part uses a per-core L1 cache of 64 KB, a per-core L2 cache of 512 KB, and a total L3 cache of 8 MB. The Intel part uses a per-core L1 cache of 80 KB, a per-core L2 cache of 1.25 MB, and a shared L3 cache of 20 MB. The Intel part has a larger L3 cache by 12 MB and larger per-core L2 allocations.

The memory architecture also differs. The AMD part is limited to DDR4 with a dual-channel bus and a maximum bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and a maximum bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory support is present only on the Intel part.

PCIe connectivity reflects generation differences. The AMD part is limited to PCIe Gen 3, while the Intel part supports PCIe Gen 5, both with 16 CPU lanes.

The process node difference is notable: 7 nm for the AMD part versus 10 nm for the Intel part. Despite the larger process node, the Intel part achieves a higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz compared to 4.20 GHz on the AMD part, while maintaining a lower TDP of 45 watts versus 65 watts.

The integrated GPU differs in branding and capability tier. The AMD part uses Radeon Vega 6, and the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. Neither has recorded graphics benchmark data in the database.

The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, indicating it is positioned for overclocking on the AM4 platform. The Intel part has a locked multiplier, indicating a fixed-clock design. The production status for both processors is listed as Active.