AMD Ryzen 3 3100U vs Intel Processor N250 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head measurements for the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U and the Intel Processor N250. The recorded data shows zero wins for either processor in direct comparisons, and the head-to-head benchmark list is empty. This absence of direct comparison data means the analysis must rely on the available individual benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U and the relative positioning information provided by its nearest rivals.

For the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U, the database records a comprehensive set of PassMark benchmark scores. The processor achieves 38,455 in data compression, 1,972 in data encryption, 2,116 in extended instructions, 18 in find prime numbers, 5,854 in floating point math, 8,873 in integer math, 3,348 in multithreaded performance, 232 in physics, 4,666 in random string sorting, and 1,592 in both single-thread and single-threaded tests. The average benchmark score across all tests is 6,247.

The Intel Processor N250 has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty. This means the database provides no direct performance measurements for the N250, making quantitative comparison between the two processors impossible based on recorded test results.

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U holds a 62nd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, indicating it outperforms 62 percent of all recorded processors. The Intel Processor N250 holds a 50th percentile ranking, placing it exactly at the median of all recorded CPUs. While these percentile values provide some relative context, they do not substitute for direct benchmark comparisons.

The nearest rivals to the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U provide additional context for its average score. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X scores 6,231, which is 0.3 percent higher. The AMD EPYC 7272 scores 6,186, which is 1 percent higher. The Intel Core i9-10920X scores 6,347, which is 1.6 percent lower. The Intel Core i9-7940X scores 6,147, which is 1.6 percent higher. These deltas show the Ryzen 3 3100U sits within a narrow performance band, within 1.6 percent of these much larger and more expensive processors in average benchmark score.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U uses the Picasso codename and belongs to the Ryzen 3 generation built on the Zen+ architecture. The Intel Processor N250 uses the Twin Lake codename and architecture, belonging to the Intel Processor generation built on the Alder Lake-N architecture. These are fundamentally different design approaches from different eras and manufacturers.

The manufacturing process differs significantly. The AMD processor uses a 12 nm process node fabricated by GlobalFoundries. The Intel processor uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel's own foundry. The AMD processor contains 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die size, while the database records no transistor count or die size for the Intel processor.

Core and thread configurations differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has 2 cores and 2 threads, while the Intel Processor N250 has 4 cores and 4 threads. This gives the Intel processor twice the core count and thread count of the AMD part.

Cache hierarchies show notable differences. Both processors have 96 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD processor has 512 KB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel processor has 2 MB of shared L2 cache. For L3 cache, the AMD processor has 4 MB shared, while the Intel processor has 6 MB shared. The Intel processor therefore offers more total cache capacity, particularly in L2 and L3.

Clock speeds differ in both base and boost frequencies. The AMD processor has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 3.20 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 0.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The Intel processor boosts 0.60 GHz higher but has a dramatically lower base clock.

Memory support diverges significantly. The AMD processor supports DDR4 memory only, in dual-channel configuration. The Intel processor supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 memory, but in single-channel configuration. Both processors record the same memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. Neither supports ECC memory.

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD processor uses Radeon Vega 8 graphics, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 730. Both processors use PCIe Gen 3, though the Intel processor specifies 9 lanes for the CPU only.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data shows the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U is the only processor with recorded performance measurements. Its scores across various workloads indicate its strengths and weaknesses relative to the broader database.

The data compression score of 38,455 is the highest recorded result for the AMD processor, suggesting strong performance in compression workloads. The integer math score of 8,873 and floating point math score of 5,854 indicate solid general arithmetic performance. The random string sorting score of 4,666 shows reasonable sorting capability. The multithreaded score of 3,348 and single-thread score of 1,592 provide baseline performance for both threaded and single-threaded scenarios.

The lowest scores reveal weaknesses. The find prime numbers score of 18 is exceptionally low, indicating poor performance in prime number calculations. The physics score of 232 is also low, suggesting limited physics simulation capability. The data encryption score of 1,972 and extended instructions score of 2,116 are moderate but not outstanding.

The Intel Processor N250 has no recorded benchmark scores, so the database provides no evidence of its performance strengths or weaknesses. The 50th percentile ranking suggests it sits at the median of all CPUs, but without individual test scores, no workload-specific analysis is possible.

The AMD processor's 62nd percentile ranking places it above the median, and its average score of 6,247 within 1.6 percent of much higher-tier processors like the Intel Core i9-10920X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X indicates competitive average performance despite its low core count.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U and Intel Processor N250 differ in nearly every specification category recorded in the database.

The AMD processor belongs to the 3000 series with 2 cores and 2 threads. The Intel processor has 4 cores and 4 threads. The AMD processor has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and boost clock of 3.20 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 0.10 GHz and boost clock of 3.80 GHz.

Thermal design power differs by 9 watts. The AMD processor has a TDP of 15 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 6 watts.

Sockets differ completely. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP5, while the Intel processor uses Intel BGA 1264.

The manufacturing process differs by 2 nm. The AMD processor uses 12 nm from GlobalFoundries, while the Intel processor uses 10 nm from Intel.

Cache configurations differ. The AMD processor has 512 KB L2 per core and 4 MB shared L3. The Intel processor has 2 MB shared L2 and 6 MB shared L3. Both have 96 KB L1 per core.

Memory support differs. The AMD processor supports only DDR4 in dual-channel. The Intel processor supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 in single-channel. Both record 38.4 GB/s bandwidth and neither supports ECC.

Integrated graphics differ: Radeon Vega 8 on AMD versus UHD Graphics 730 on Intel. Both use PCIe Gen 3, with the Intel processor specifying 9 lanes for CPU only.

Release dates differ by approximately 17 months. The Intel processor was released on January 6, 2025, while the AMD processor has a recorded release date of May 31, 2026.

Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded in the database, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD processor has the part number YM3100C4T2OFG, while the Intel processor has the part number SRPNS.

FAQ

Q: How do the core counts compare between the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U and the Intel Processor N250?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has 2 cores and 2 threads, while the Intel Processor N250 has 4 cores and 4 threads. The Intel processor has twice the core count and thread count.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Processor N250 has a boost clock of 3.80 GHz, which is 0.60 GHz higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U's boost clock of 3.20 GHz.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U supports DDR4 memory only in dual-channel configuration. The Intel Processor N250 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 memory in single-channel configuration. Both processors record the same memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has a TDP of 15 watts, while the Intel Processor N250 has a TDP of 6 watts. The Intel processor consumes 9 watts less.

Q: How does the AMD processor's benchmark performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has an average benchmark score of 6,247. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X at 6,231 (0.3 percent higher), the AMD EPYC 7272 at 6,186 (1 percent higher), the Intel Core i9-10920X at 6,347 (1.6 percent lower), and the Intel Core i9-7940X at 6,147 (1.6 percent higher).

Q: Which processor has more cache?

A: The Intel Processor N250 has 2 MB shared L2 and 6 MB shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has 512 KB L2 per core and 4 MB shared L3 cache. Both have 96 KB L1 per core.

The Verdict

The benchmark database provides substantially more performance data for the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U than for the Intel Processor N250. The AMD processor has 11 recorded benchmark scores, an average score of 6,247, and a 62nd percentile ranking. The Intel processor has no recorded benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking.

For users selecting based on recorded performance data, the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U is the only processor with measurable results. Its average benchmark score of 6,247 places it within 1.6 percent of high-end desktop processors like the Intel Core i9-10920X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. Its 62nd percentile ranking indicates it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database.

The Intel Processor N250 offers advantages in specifications that the data can confirm. It has 4 cores versus 2, a 0.60 GHz higher boost clock, 2 MB more L3 cache, a 9 watt lower TDP, and support for DDR5 and LPDDR5 memory. It also holds a 50th percentile ranking, which indicates median performance across all CPUs.

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U offers the advantages of dual-channel memory support, a 12 nm process with 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die, and a higher base clock of 1.90 GHz versus 0.10 GHz. Its 62nd percentile ranking exceeds the Intel processor's 50th percentile.

The data suggests the AMD processor has a higher average performance ranking despite its lower core count. The Intel processor provides more cores, higher boost clock, more cache, and lower power consumption, but lacks any recorded benchmark scores to verify its actual performance.

The choice depends on which factors matter most. For confirmed benchmark performance and higher percentile ranking, the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has the recorded data to support it. For core count, boost clock, cache capacity, and power efficiency, the Intel Processor N250 has the specification advantage. Without benchmark scores for the Intel processor, the database cannot confirm whether its specification advantages translate into actual performance superiority.