AMD Ryzen 3 3100U vs Intel Processor N150 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U and Intel Processor N150 are both mobile processors, but the benchmark data places them in completely different performance tiers. The Ryzen 3 3100U shows an average benchmark score of 6247, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Processor N150 scores 1025 on average, which lands at the 28th percentile. The Ryzen 3 3100U also sits near the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, which scores 6231 (a 0.3% difference), and the Intel Core i9-10920X at 6347 (a -1.6% difference). The Intel Processor N150 is closest to the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T at 1024 (0.1% difference) and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U at 1024 (0.1% difference).

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two processors share no common benchmark tests in the database, so direct comparisons must be drawn from their respective average scores and percentile positions. The Ryzen 3 3100U delivers an average score of 6247, which is roughly six times higher than the Intel Processor N150's average of 1025. This difference is substantial: the Ryzen 3 3100U outperforms the N150 by about 509% based on the recorded averages. In percentile terms, the Ryzen 3 3100U ranks at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Processor N150 sits at the 28th percentile, a gap of 34 percentile points.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each chip clarifies the performance context. The Ryzen 3 3100U is surrounded by high-end desktop processors: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (6231, 0.3% ahead), the AMD EPYC 7272 (6186, 1% ahead), the Intel Core i9-10920X (6347, 1.6% behind), and the Intel Core i9-7940X (6147, 1.6% ahead). These deltas are small, indicating the Ryzen 3 3100U's average score is competitive with those heavy hitters. The Intel Processor N150, by contrast, is matched against older or lower-tier chips: the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T (1024, 0.1% ahead), the Intel Core i3-4340 (1026, 0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (1024, 0.1% ahead), and the Intel Core i7-5650U (1027, 0.2% behind). These deltas are also small, but the absolute scores are far lower.

The Ryzen 3 3100U's benchmark suite includes PassMark tests that show its strengths. It scores 38455 in data compression, 1972 in data encryption, 2116 in extended instructions, 18 in find prime numbers, 5854 in floating point math, 8873 in integer math, 3348 in multithread, 232 in physics, 4666 in random string sorting, and 1592 in single-thread tests. The Intel Processor N150 only has Cinebench results: 422.5 in Cinebench R15 multicore, 153.15 in R15 singlecore, 2590.5 in R23 multicore, and 935 in R23 singlecore. Because the test suites do not overlap, the database cannot produce head-to-head wins for either chip, but the average scores indicate a clear overall advantage for the Ryzen 3 3100U.

Architecture Differences

The Ryzen 3 3100U uses AMD's Picasso architecture, which is based on the Zen+ microarchitecture, and it is built on a 12 nm process by GlobalFoundries. The processor contains 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, with a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 3.20 GHz. The cache layout includes 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. It uses AMD Socket FP5 and integrates Radeon Vega 8 graphics. The TDP is 15 watts, and it is designated as a mobile segment part. The release date in the database is 2026-05-31, and the part number is YM3100C4T2OFG.

The Intel Processor N150 uses the Twin Lake architecture, which is part of the Alder Lake-N generation, and it is built on a 10 nm process by Intel. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, with a base clock of 0.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.60 GHz. The cache includes 96 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of shared L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. Memory support is broader: DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5, but the memory bus is single-channel, still providing a bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The chip uses Intel BGA 1264 and integrates UHD Graphics 730. The TDP is 6 watts, which is lower than the AMD part. It also sits in the mobile segment and has a release date of 2024-11-19. The part number is SRPNR.

Several differences stand out. The Ryzen 3 3100U has more threads per core (2 threads on 2 cores) compared to the Intel N150's 4 threads on 4 cores, meaning the AMD chip uses simultaneous multithreading while the Intel chip does not. The Intel N150 has more physical cores (4 vs 2), but the Ryzen 3 3100U has a higher base clock (1.90 GHz vs 0.10 GHz) and a lower boost clock (3.20 GHz vs 3.60 GHz). The Intel N150 uses a more advanced 10 nm process compared to AMD's 12 nm, but AMD's chip has a larger transistor count at 4,940 million, while the Intel part has no listed transistor or die size data. The L3 cache is larger on the Intel N150 at 6 MB shared, versus 4 MB shared on the AMD. The AMD chip uses dual-channel memory, while the Intel chip uses single-channel, which can affect memory bandwidth in practice even though the rated bandwidth is identical at 38.4 GB/s. The TDP difference is notable: 15 watts for AMD versus 6 watts for Intel.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 3 3100U wins in overall performance as measured by average benchmark score. Its score of 6247 places it far above the Intel N150's 1025. The AMD chip's PassMark results, such as 38455 in data compression and 8873 in integer math, indicate strong throughput in data-heavy and integer workloads. The single-thread score of 1592 also shows solid per-core performance, which is relevant for applications that rely on one or two threads.

The Ryzen 3 3100U also wins in memory bandwidth configuration, as it supports dual-channel memory, which generally provides higher effective bandwidth for multi-threaded tasks. Its larger L2 cache per core (512 KB per core) could benefit workloads with high data locality. The chip's higher base clock of 1.90 GHz provides a floor for consistent performance without needing to boost.

The Intel Processor N150 wins in power efficiency. Its TDP is 6 watts, which is less than half of the Ryzen 3 3100U's 15 watts. This makes the Intel part more suitable for fanless or passively cooled designs and for devices where battery life is prioritized over raw performance. The Intel chip also has more cores (4 vs 2), which can help in lightly threaded workloads that scale across cores, though the lack of SMT limits its thread count to 4. The Intel N150's boost clock is higher at 3.60 GHz, which could give it an advantage in short, single-threaded bursts where the boost is sustained.

The Intel N150 also supports a wider range of memory types (DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5), which offers flexibility in system design, even though the bus is single-channel. Its L3 cache is larger at 6 MB shared, which can improve hit rates in some workloads. The Intel chip's more advanced 10 nm process node suggests better transistor density, though no transistor count is listed to confirm.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U is the stronger performer by a wide margin. Its average benchmark score of 6247 is roughly six times the Intel Processor N150's 1025, and its 62nd percentile ranking versus the 28th percentile confirms that it competes with much higher-end hardware. The nearest rivals for the Ryzen 3 3100U include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Intel Core i9-10920X, which are desktop-class processors, while the Intel N150's nearest rivals are older or lower-tier mobile and desktop chips like the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T and Intel Core i3-4340.

For users who need processing power for tasks such as data compression, integer math, or general multi-threaded workloads, the Ryzen 3 3100U is the clear choice. Its dual-channel memory support and higher base clock provide a more robust foundation for sustained performance. The Intel Processor N150, with its 6-watt TDP, is better suited for low-power applications where energy consumption is the primary concern. Its 4 cores and higher boost clock offer some advantages in bursty, single-threaded tasks, and its broader memory support adds flexibility.

The Ryzen 3 3100U is also the more recent release according to the database, with a release date of 2026-05-31, compared to the Intel N150's 2024-11-19. Both chips are marked as Active in production status. Neither chip has a launch MSRP listed. The Ryzen 3 3100U's average score places it near the AMD EPYC 7272, a server processor, which further underscores its performance level. The Intel N150's average score places it near the Intel Core i7-5650U, an older ultra-low-power mobile chip.

In summary, the Ryzen 3 3100U should be selected for performance-oriented mobile devices, while the Intel Processor N150 should be selected for power-constrained designs. The benchmark database shows no overlap in test suites, so direct per-test comparisons are unavailable, but the average scores and percentile rankings provide a clear overall picture.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has an average benchmark score of 6247, while the Intel Processor N150 scores 1025.

Q: How does the Ryzen 3 3100U compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 3 3100U is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, 1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7272, 1.6% behind the Intel Core i9-10920X, and 1.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-7940X.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has 2 cores and 2 threads. The Intel Processor N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has a TDP of 15 watts, while the Intel Processor N150 has a TDP of 6 watts.

Q: Which processor supports dual-channel memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U supports dual-channel memory. The Intel Processor N150 supports single-channel memory.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U uses Radeon Vega 8 graphics. The Intel Processor N150 uses UHD Graphics 730.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has 2 cores and 2 threads, while the Intel Processor N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads. The base clock is 1.90 GHz for the AMD and 0.10 GHz for the Intel. The boost clock is 3.20 GHz for the AMD and 3.60 GHz for the Intel. The TDP is 15 watts for the AMD and 6 watts for the Intel. The socket is AMD Socket FP5 for the AMD and Intel BGA 1264 for the Intel. The process node is 12 nm for the AMD and 10 nm for the Intel. The foundry is GlobalFoundries for the AMD and Intel for the Intel. The transistor count is 4,940 million for the AMD, with no listing for the Intel. The die size is 210 mm² for the AMD, with no listing for the Intel. The L2 cache is 512 KB per core for the AMD and 2 MB shared for the Intel. The L3 cache is 4 MB shared for the AMD and 6 MB shared for the Intel. Memory support is DDR4 for the AMD and DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5 for the Intel. The memory bus is dual-channel for the AMD and single-channel for the Intel. Both support PCIe Gen 3, but the Intel lists 9 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 8 for the AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for the Intel. The release date is 2026-05-31 for the AMD and 2024-11-19 for the Intel. The part number is YM3100C4T2OFG for the AMD and SRPNR for the Intel. Both are in the mobile market segment, are Active in production, and have no launch MSRP listed. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. Neither supports ECC memory. Both have a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s.