AMD Ryzen 3 3100U vs Intel Core 7 253PE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 3 3100U

CORE STATE Picasso
CORE SPECS 2 Cores / 2 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.9 Base / 3.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 4 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 15W
ARCHITECTURE Picasso
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 7 253PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
38,455
339,133
passmark_data_encryption
1,972
18,385
passmark_extended_instructions
2,116
21,806
passmark_find_prime_numbers
18
138
passmark_floating_point_math
5,854
80,870
passmark_integer_math
8,873
114,158
passmark_multithread
3,348
29,271
passmark_physics
232
1,845
passmark_random_string_sorting
4,666
32,777
passmark_single_thread
1,592
3,955
passmark_singlethread
1,592
3,955
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,507
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
354
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
10,449
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,475
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
24,880
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,512

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 3 3100U vs Intel Core 7 253PE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data records a complete sweep for the Intel Core 7 253PE across all 11 shared tests. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U does not win a single head-to-head comparison. The margins are substantial, starting with the smallest gap in single-thread performance and widening dramatically in multi-threaded workloads.

In single-thread tests, the Intel part scores 3955 against 1592 for the AMD chip, a delta of -59.7%. This means the Intel processor delivers more than double the per-core throughput in the recorded Passmark single-thread workload. The gap is consistent across both the passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread entries, which are duplicate measurements.

The multi-threaded results show an even larger divide. In passmark_multithread, the Intel Core 7 253PE records 29271 while the Ryzen 3 3100U manages 3348, a delta of -88.6%. The Intel processor is roughly 8.7 times faster in this aggregate workload, reflecting its 10 cores and 20 threads against the AMD chip's 2 cores and 2 threads.

Data compression follows a similar pattern. The Intel part scores 339133 versus 38455 for the AMD, a delta of -88.7%. The AMD chip's score is about 11% of the Intel result. Integer math shows a -92.2% delta, with scores of 114158 and 8873 respectively. Floating point math records 80870 for Intel and 5854 for AMD, a -92.8% delta, the largest percentage gap in the entire comparison.

The encryption workload delivers 18385 for Intel versus 1972 for AMD, a -89.3% delta. Extended instructions follow at 21806 versus 2116, a -90.3% delta. Prime number finding shows 138 versus 18, a -87% delta. Random string sorting records 32777 versus 4666, a -85.8% delta. Physics simulation completes the set with 1845 versus 232, a -87.4% delta.

The average benchmark score in the database places the Intel Core 7 253PE at 40557, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U sits at 6247. The Intel processor's nearest rivals include the Intel Core 5 223PE at 40585 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H at 40518 (+0.1% delta), the Intel Xeon 6357P at 40630 (-0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H at 40431 (+0.3% delta). The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X at 6231 (+0.3% delta), the AMD EPYC 7272 at 6186 (+1% delta), the Intel Core i9-10920X at 6347 (-1.6% delta), and the Intel Core i9-7940X at 6147 (+1.6% delta).

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data shows no benchmark category where the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U outperforms the Intel Core 7 253PE. Every single test in the head-to-head list favors the Intel part. The closest relative margin is in single-thread performance, where the Intel chip still leads by 59.7%. The largest margin is in floating point math, where the Intel chip leads by 92.8%.

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U does hold a meaningful position within its own performance tier. Its average benchmark score of 6247 places it in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are all high-core-count desktop parts, including the 16-core AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and the 10-core Intel Core i9-10920X, with deltas under 2%. This indicates the Ryzen 3 3100U's recorded scores position it competitively against much larger processors, despite its modest 2-core configuration.

The Intel Core 7 253PE sits in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 40557. Its nearest rivals are all modern high-end parts, including the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and Intel's own Core Ultra X7 368H, with deltas under 0.5%. The Intel part's scores cluster tightly with these competitors, suggesting it delivers performance in the same bracket as flagship mobile and desktop processors from the same generation.

For use-case analysis, the data supports a clear split. The Intel Core 7 253PE is suited for workloads that scale with core count and thread count: the multithread, integer math, floating point math, and data compression tests all show gains above 85% over the AMD chip. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U, with its 2 cores and 2 threads, is positioned for basic single-threaded tasks, though even there the Intel part leads by nearly 60%. The AMD chip's 15-watt TDP and 12 nm process suggest a low-power mobile design, while the Intel part's 65-watt TDP and 10 nm process indicate a desktop-oriented part.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design generations and market segments. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U uses the Picasso codename, which the database lists as a Zen+ (Picasso) generation part. It is built on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. The Intel Core 7 253PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, a Core 7 generation part built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The database records no transistor count or die size for the Intel chip.

Core and thread counts differ fundamentally. The AMD part has 2 cores and 2 threads, with no simultaneous multithreading. The Intel part has 10 cores and 20 threads, doubling its thread count through hyper-threading. Base clocks are 1.90 GHz for the AMD chip and 2.50 GHz for the Intel chip. Boost clocks are 3.20 GHz and 5.50 GHz respectively.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 253PE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's L3 cache is more than eight times larger than the AMD part's total L3 allocation.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD chip supports DDR4 only, with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports ECC memory, while the AMD part does not. PCIe capabilities differ: the AMD chip uses Gen 3, while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics are present on both parts. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U uses Radeon Vega 8, while the Intel Core 7 253PE uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part targets the mobile segment with an AMD Socket FP5, while the Intel part targets the desktop segment with an Intel Socket 1700. The Intel part's launch MSRP is $384, recorded once here.

The Verdict

The data supports only one conclusion for performance: the Intel Core 7 253PE dominates the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U in every recorded benchmark. The smallest gap is 59.7% in single-thread performance, and the largest is 92.8% in floating point math. The Intel part's average score of 40557 is roughly 6.5 times the AMD part's 6247. The Intel chip sits in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD chip sits in the 62nd percentile.

For a user choosing between these two based strictly on benchmark results, the Intel Core 7 253PE is the clear choice for any workload involving multi-threading, data compression, encryption, mathematical computation, or physics simulation. Its 10 cores and 20 threads, 33 MB of L3 cache, DDR5 memory support, and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth all contribute to the recorded performance advantage.

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U does have a role in the database's performance landscape. Its 62nd percentile ranking and close scores to much larger processors like the Threadripper 1950X and Core i9-10920X indicate that it punches above its core count in some respects. Its 15-watt TDP and mobile socket suggest a low-power design suited for compact or battery-driven systems. For a user prioritizing power efficiency over raw performance, the AMD part's specifications are relevant. However, the recorded benchmarks do not show any workload where the AMD chip wins.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread score?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE scores 3955 in passmark_single_thread, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U scores 1592, a delta of -59.7% in favor of Intel.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has an average benchmark score of 40557, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has 6247. The Intel part's score is approximately 6.5 times higher.

Q: How do their core and thread counts compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has 2 cores and 2 threads. The Intel Core 7 253PE has 10 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U does not support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U supports DDR4 only. The Intel Core 7 253PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What are the boost clocks of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has a boost clock of 3.20 GHz. The Intel Core 7 253PE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 3 3100U | Intel Core 7 253PE |

|-------|-------------------|--------------------|

| Cores | 2 | 10 |

| Threads | 2 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 1.90 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.20 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Picasso | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 12 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | Intel |

| Transistors | 4,940 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3 | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $384 |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
3 3100U
7 253PE
Core Specs
Cores
2
10 +400.0%
Threads
2
20 +900.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
1.9
2.5 +31.6%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.2
5.5 +71.9%
Frequency (GHz)
1.9
2.5 +31.6%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.2
5.5 +71.9%
Multiplier
19
25 +31.6%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
96 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB (shared)
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
15
65 +333.3%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
12-35 W
—
Architecture
Codename
Picasso
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 3 (Zen+ (Picasso))
Core 7 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
12 nm
10 nm
Transistors
4,940 million
—
Die Size
210 mm²
—
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
38.4 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP5
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 3
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
P-Core Turbo
—
5.3 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$384
Part Number
YM3100C4T2OFG
SA4QE
Package
FP5
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
105°C
100°C
View Ryzen 3 3100U Details View Core 7 253PE Details