AMD Ryzen 3 3100U vs AMD Ryzen 5 150 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data records a decisive sweep. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 wins all 11 recorded PassMark tests against the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U. The largest margin appears in integer math, where the Ryzen 5 150 scores 62,151 versus the Ryzen 3 3100U’s 8,873, a delta of -85.7%. Extended instructions follow closely, with the Ryzen 5 150 at 14,675 against 2,116, a delta of -85.6%. Data encryption shows a similar gap: 13,425 versus 1,972, a delta of -85.3%.

Floating-point math also heavily favors the Ryzen 5 150, which records 35,118 against 5,854, a delta of -83.3%. Data compression delivers 211,289 for the Ryzen 5 150 versus 38,455, a delta of -81.8%. Multithread performance sees the Ryzen 5 150 at 17,492 against 3,348, a delta of -80.9%. Random string sorting shows 22,382 versus 4,666, a delta of -79.2%.

Physics simulation is another clear win: 806 for the Ryzen 5 150 versus 232, a delta of -71.2%. Prime number finding shows 47 against 18, a delta of -61.7%. The narrowest margin in the entire set is single-thread performance, where the Ryzen 5 150 scores 3,155 versus 1,592, a delta of -49.5%. Both the passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread entries record identical values for each processor, confirming consistency in the measurement.

The average benchmark score reinforces the separation. The Ryzen 5 150 posts an average of 34,881, while the Ryzen 3 3100U averages 6,247. The percentile ranking also differs sharply: the Ryzen 5 150 sits at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, while the Ryzen 3 3100U sits at the 62nd percentile. The nearest rivals for each chip confirm their respective tiers. The Ryzen 5 150’s closest competitors include the Intel Xeon 6349P (average 34,890, delta 0%), Intel Core 7 253PTE (34,962, -0.2%), Intel Core i7-13800H (34,988, -0.3%), and Intel Core i9-12900HX (35,003, -0.3%). The Ryzen 3 3100U’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (6,231, +0.3%), AMD EPYC 7272 (6,186, +1%), Intel Core i9-10920X (6,347, -1.6%), and Intel Core i9-7940X (6,147, +1.6%). The data places the Ryzen 5 150 in a performance class roughly five times higher by average score, while the Ryzen 3 3100U sits near entry-level mobile parts.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and process nodes. The Ryzen 3 3100U uses the Picasso codename, built on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with a Zen+ (Picasso) generation label. The Ryzen 5 150 uses the Rembrandt-R codename, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a Zen 3+ (Rembrandt) architecture. The die size for both is listed as 210 mm², but the transistor count differs dramatically: the Ryzen 3 3100U packs 4,940 million transistors, while the Ryzen 5 150 has no listed transistor count in the database.

Core and thread counts diverge significantly. The Ryzen 3 3100U has 2 cores and 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads. Cache configurations also differ. The Ryzen 3 3100U has 96 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 4 MB of shared L3. The Ryzen 5 150 has 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, but 16 MB of shared L3. The L1 per core is actually larger on the older chip, yet the L3 advantage for the Ryzen 5 150 is fourfold.

Clock speeds favor the Ryzen 5 150 substantially. The base clock is 3.30 GHz versus 1.90 GHz, and the boost clock is 4.55 GHz versus 3.20 GHz. Thermal design power reflects the performance gap: the Ryzen 5 150 is rated at 35 W, while the Ryzen 3 3100U is rated at 15 W. Sockets are not interchangeable, with the Ryzen 3 3100U using AMD Socket FP5 and the Ryzen 5 150 using AMD Socket FP7.

Memory support shows a generational shift. The Ryzen 3 3100U supports DDR4 with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The Ryzen 5 150 supports DDR5 with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, exactly double. PCIe capability also differs: the Ryzen 3 3100U offers Gen 3, while the Ryzen 5 150 offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are distinct as well: the Ryzen 3 3100U uses Radeon Vega 8, while the Ryzen 5 150 uses Radeon 660M. Neither chip supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 150 wins every recorded benchmark, so the use-case split is lopsided. For multi-threaded workloads, the Ryzen 5 150’s 6 cores and 12 threads provide a massive advantage, reflected in the multithread score of 17,492 versus 3,348. Data compression, integer math, and extended instructions all favor the newer chip by margins above 80%. Any workload that scales with core count, such as compilation, rendering, or heavy productivity, lands firmly with the Ryzen 5 150.

Single-thread performance also goes to the Ryzen 5 150, though by a smaller margin. The score of 3,155 versus 1,592 represents a 49.5% gap, which indicates that the Zen 3+ architecture’s higher boost clock of 4.55 GHz delivers a meaningful uplift for latency-sensitive tasks. The Ryzen 3 3100U’s 3.20 GHz boost clock and Zen+ architecture cannot close that gap in any recorded test.

The Ryzen 3 3100U has no benchmark wins, but its profile suits low-power scenarios. The 15 W TDP, combined with the older Picasso design and 2-core configuration, points toward basic productivity, light web browsing, and office tasks. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 GPU can handle casual graphics work, but the data does not include any GPU benchmarks. For users prioritizing battery life in a thin mobile chassis, the lower TDP is an advantage, though the performance delta is stark.

The Ryzen 5 150’s 35 W TDP and DDR5 support make it a better fit for more demanding mobile workloads. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth is double the Ryzen 3 3100U’s 38.4 GB/s, which benefits memory-intensive applications. The Radeon 660M integrated graphics also represent a newer generation, though no GPU benchmark scores are recorded in the database. In short, the Ryzen 5 150 is the clear choice for computational tasks, while the Ryzen 3 3100U remains a low-power option for basic usage.

FAQ

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap appears in integer math, where the Ryzen 5 150 scores 62,151 versus the Ryzen 3 3100U’s 8,873, a delta of -85.7%. Extended instructions show a similar -85.6% delta.

Q: How much faster is the Ryzen 5 150 in single-thread performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 150 scores 3,155 in the single-thread test, while the Ryzen 3 3100U scores 1,592, representing a -49.5% delta. This is the smallest margin of all recorded benchmarks.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Ryzen 3 3100U has 2 cores and 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen 5 150 has a boost clock of 4.55 GHz, compared to the Ryzen 3 3100U’s 3.20 GHz.

Q: What memory types do the two processors support?

A: The Ryzen 3 3100U supports DDR4 with a bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s, while the Ryzen 5 150 supports DDR5 with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: How do the process nodes differ?

A: The Ryzen 3 3100U uses a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries, while the Ryzen 5 150 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification category. The Ryzen 3 3100U has 2 cores and 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 1.90 GHz versus 3.30 GHz, and boost clocks are 3.20 GHz versus 4.55 GHz. TDP is 15 W for the Ryzen 3 3100U and 35 W for the Ryzen 5 150.

Sockets differ: AMD Socket FP5 for the Ryzen 3 3100U, AMD Socket FP7 for the Ryzen 5 150. The codenames are Picasso versus Rembrandt-R, with generations listed as Zen+ (Picasso) versus Zen 3+ (Rembrandt). Process nodes are 12 nm at GlobalFoundries versus 6 nm at TSMC. The transistor count is 4,940 million for the Ryzen 3 3100U, while no count is listed for the Ryzen 5 150. Die size is identical at 210 mm².

Cache configurations differ in L1 and L3. The Ryzen 3 3100U has 96 KB of L1 per core and 4 MB of shared L3, while the Ryzen 5 150 has 64 KB of L1 per core and 16 MB of shared L3. Both have 512 KB of L2 per core. Memory support is DDR4 for the Ryzen 3 3100U and DDR5 for the Ryzen 5 150, with bandwidths of 38.4 GB/s and 76.8 GB/s respectively. PCIe capability is Gen 3 for the Ryzen 3 3100U and Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only) for the Ryzen 5 150.

Integrated graphics differ: Radeon Vega 8 on the Ryzen 3 3100U versus Radeon 660M on the Ryzen 5 150. Release dates are also distinct, with the Ryzen 3 3100U listed as 2026-05-31 and the Ryzen 5 150 as 2025-09-30. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The part numbers are YM3100C4T2OFG for the Ryzen 3 3100U and 100-000000990 (FP7r2) for the Ryzen 5 150.