AMD Ryzen 3 30 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 30 and Intel Core 5 213PTE occupy different corners of the processor market, with the data showing a clear performance hierarchy. The Ryzen 3 30 is a low-power mobile processor built for efficiency, while the Core 5 213PTE is a desktop part aimed at sustained performance. Benchmark results indicate the Intel part wins every single head-to-head test recorded in the database, making the choice straightforward for users who prioritize raw compute power. The Ryzen 3 30, however, remains relevant for systems where power draw and thermal output are the primary constraints.

The Verdict

The data shows a decisive performance gap between these two processors. The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins 11 out of 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, with no recorded wins for the AMD Ryzen 3 30. The average benchmark score for the Intel part is 32924, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD part scores 20137 on average, placing it in the 74th percentile. The Intel processor is 63.4% ahead in average benchmark score, a substantial margin that reflects its larger core count and higher boost clock.

The Ryzen 3 30 is for users who need a compact, low-power solution. Its 15 watt TDP and 6 nm process node make it suitable for thin-and-light mobile systems where battery life and cooling capacity are limited. The Core 5 213PTE is for users who need maximum throughput in a desktop environment. Its 45 watt TDP, 8 cores, and 16 threads deliver significantly higher multi-threaded performance, as shown by the passmark_multithread score of 25590 compared to 9027 for the AMD part. The Intel chip also carries a launch MSRP of $221, which can be stated once as a reference point, though the analysis here focuses on performance data.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 uses the Zen 2 architecture with the Mendocino codename, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 100 mm². The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The Intel part uses an 8-core, 16-thread configuration, while the AMD part uses a 4-core, 8-thread configuration.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The Ryzen 3 30 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 5 213PTE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's larger L3 cache, 24 MB versus 4 MB, gives it a significant advantage in workloads that benefit from larger working sets residing on-chip.

The platforms also differ in memory and expansion support. The Ryzen 3 30 supports LPDDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 88.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It does not support ECC memory. The Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and it does support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD part provides Gen 3 with 4 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives the Intel desktop platform more headroom for expansion cards and high-speed storage. The integrated graphics also differ, with the Ryzen 3 30 using Radeon 610M and the Core 5 213PTE using UHD Graphics 730.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a consistent pattern of Intel dominance across all tested workloads. The largest margin is in passmark_find_prime_numbers, where the Intel part scores 157 against 20 for the AMD part, a delta of -87.3% from the AMD perspective. This workload is highly sensitive to single-thread performance and clock speed, and the Core 5 213PTE's 5.20 GHz boost clock versus the Ryzen 3 30's 4.10 GHz boost clock explains much of the gap.

In passmark_floating_point_math, the Intel part scores 71722 against 14448 for the AMD part, a delta of -79.9%. The passmark_physics test shows a similar pattern, with the Intel part scoring 2199 against 436, a delta of -80.2%. These results indicate that the Intel processor's wider execution resources and higher core count deliver far greater throughput in mathematically intensive tasks.

The passmark_integer_math test shows the Intel part scoring 93109 against 29846, a delta of -67.9%. The passmark_extended_instructions test shows 16146 versus 6075, a delta of -62.4%. The passmark_multithread test, which reflects overall multi-core performance, shows the Intel part scoring 25590 against 9027, a delta of -64.7%.

The single-thread results are closer but still favor Intel. In passmark_single_thread, the Intel part scores 3718 against 2465, a delta of -33.7%. This is the smallest margin in the entire comparison, but it still represents a substantial single-thread advantage. The passmark_data_compression test shows the Intel part scoring 261083 against 135834, a delta of -48%. The passmark_data_encryption test shows 14413 versus 6461, a delta of -55.2%. The passmark_random_string_sorting test shows 30106 versus 14431, a delta of -52.1%.

The Intel part also scores higher in Cinebench tests, which are not present for the AMD part in this comparison. The Core 5 213PTE scores 2192 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 309 in R15 single-core, 9135 in R20 multi-core, 1289 in R20 single-core, 21751 in R23 multi-core, and 3070 in R23 single-core.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE boosts up to 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 30 boosts up to 4.10 GHz.

Q: Which processor is more power-efficient?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 30 has a TDP of 15 watts, compared to 45 watts for the Intel Core 5 213PTE. The AMD part also uses a smaller 6 nm process node versus Intel's 10 nm node.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 does not.

Q: How does the multi-threaded performance compare?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 25590 in passmark_multithread, while the AMD Ryzen 3 30 scores 9027. The Intel part is 64.7% ahead.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 3 30 has 4 MB of shared L3 cache.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins in every benchmark category recorded in the database. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 5.20 GHz boost clock, deliver superior performance in multi-threaded workloads such as rendering, compilation, and data processing. The passmark_multithread score of 25590 confirms this, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21751 reinforces the assessment. The 24 MB L3 cache and 2 MB L2 cache per core help in workloads with large datasets that need fast repeated access. The Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes also makes this a stronger choice for systems with high-bandwidth expansion needs.

The AMD Ryzen 3 30 wins in efficiency and platform compactness. Its 15 watt TDP is one-third of the Intel part's 45 watt TDP, making it suitable for passively cooled or lightly cooled mobile chassis. The 6 nm process node helps achieve this efficiency, and the integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide a display output without requiring a discrete GPU. The LPDDR5 memory support with 88.0 GB/s of bandwidth exceeds the Intel part's 76.8 GB/s, which is notable given the lower power envelope. For workloads that are memory-bandwidth-bound and power-limited, the AMD part delivers more bandwidth per watt, though its absolute scores are far lower.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification. The AMD Ryzen 3 30 uses 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE uses 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 2.40 GHz for the AMD part and 2.10 GHz for the Intel part, but boost clocks favor Intel at 5.20 GHz versus 4.10 GHz. TDP ratings are 15 watts for AMD and 45 watts for Intel. The AMD part uses the AMD Socket FT6, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD architecture is Zen 2 with the Mendocino codename, while Intel uses the Bartlett Lake codename. The process nodes are 6 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel, with different foundries: TSMC for AMD and Intel for Intel. The AMD die size is 100 mm², while no die size is recorded for Intel.

Cache configurations differ across all levels. L1 cache is 64 KB per core for AMD and 80 KB per core for Intel. L2 cache is 512 KB per core for AMD and 2 MB per core for Intel. L3 cache is 4 MB shared for AMD and 24 MB shared for Intel. Memory support differs: AMD supports LPDDR5 only, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 88.0 GB/s for AMD and 76.8 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory support is absent on AMD and present on Intel. PCIe support is Gen 3 with 4 lanes for AMD and Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon 610M for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. The market segments differ, with AMD targeting mobile and Intel targeting desktop. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD part. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.