AMD Ryzen 3 210 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark database places the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 in different performance tiers, though the comparison is complicated by the fact that the Qualcomm part has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. For the AMD Ryzen 3 210, the measured results span a wide range of workloads, from single-threaded tasks to heavily parallel compute. The Ryzen 3 210 delivers its strongest relative performance in multi-threaded applications, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scoring 11,198 points and Cinebench R20 multi-core reaching 4,703 points. Its single-core results are comparatively modest, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 1,581 and Cinebench R15 single-core at 159, but the part still places in the 71st percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100, by contrast, has zero benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it holds the 50th percentile position among all CPUs, which reflects the absence of test data rather than actual performance measurements. The architecture section for the Snapdragon part lists the Oryon codename, a 12-core, 12-thread configuration, and a 4 nm TSMC process node, but no benchmark results exist to quantify how those specifications translate into real workload performance. The Ryzen 3 210 has a complete benchmark profile across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and PassMark suites, covering integer math, floating-point math, encryption, compression, and physics simulations.

Where the data allows a comparison, the Ryzen 3 210 shows clear strengths in multi-threaded content creation tasks. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,198 indicates strong sustained performance for rendering workloads, while the PassMark multi-thread score of 13,585 and integer math score of 37,933 point to capable parallel compute. The single-thread PassMark score of 3,724 and the Cinebench R23 single-core figure of 1,581 place it as a competent single-thread performer, but the stronger showing is in multi-core. The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 cannot be assigned wins in any category because the database contains no measured results for it. The win count for both parts stands at zero, with no head-to-head benchmark entries recorded.

The Verdict

The database presents an asymmetric picture. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has a full suite of measurements, and those measurements place it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 with an average score of 17,333 and a delta of -0.1 percent relative to the Ryzen 3 210, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G at 17,278 with a delta of 0.2 percent, the Intel Core 7 150U at 17,395 with a delta of -0.4 percent, and the Intel Core i5-12450H at 17,239 with a delta of 0.5 percent. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the Ryzen 3 210 sits in a tightly clustered group of comparable mobile and desktop processors, statistically indistinguishable from its nearest neighbors.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has no average benchmark score, no nearest rivals, and no percentile ranking beyond the default 50th percentile assigned to CPUs without data. Any verdict on the Snapdragon part must rely entirely on its listed specifications rather than measured performance. The specifications show a 12-core, 12-thread processor with a 3.40 GHz base clock and 4.00 GHz boost clock, a 35 W TDP, and LPDDR5X memory support with 135.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Ryzen 3 210, meanwhile, is a 4-core, 8-thread part with a 3.00 GHz base clock and 4.70 GHz boost clock, a 28 W TDP, and DDR5 memory support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

For users selecting based on recorded data, the Ryzen 3 210 is the only part with verified performance. Its 71st percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 17,321 indicate a solid mid-range mobile processor. The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 cannot be validated from the database, so any purchase decision relying on benchmark evidence favors the AMD part by default. The multi-thread advantage of the Snapdragon on paper, with 12 cores versus 4 cores, does not translate into recorded scores, and the database cannot confirm whether that core count delivers proportional performance. The verdict from the data, therefore, is that the Ryzen 3 210 is the documented performer, while the Snapdragon X1E-80-100 remains an unverified specification sheet.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table contains no entries, so a direct workload-by-workload comparison between the two processors is not possible from the recorded data. The Ryzen 3 210's individual benchmark scores, however, provide a baseline for what the AMD part achieves. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 11,198 and single-core score of 1,581 show a multi-to-single ratio of approximately 7.1, indicating strong scaling across its 4 cores and 8 threads. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score of 4,703 and single-core score of 664 yield a similar ratio of about 7.1. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score of 1,128 and single-core score of 159 produce a ratio of roughly 7.1 as well. This consistent ratio suggests that the Ryzen 3 210 extracts near-linear scaling from its threads in Cinebench workloads.

The PassMark results for the Ryzen 3 210 show a different pattern. The single-thread score of 3,724 is strong for a mobile processor, while the multi-thread score of 13,585 is only about 3.6 times the single-thread figure. The integer math score of 37,933 and floating-point math score of 23,649 indicate that integer operations run significantly faster than floating-point operations, a common characteristic for Zen 4 architecture. The data compression score of 152,017 is particularly high, while the encryption score of 8,607 is more moderate. The find prime numbers score of 49 is low in absolute terms, reflecting the nature of that specific benchmark rather than a general weakness.

The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has no benchmark scores to compare against any of these figures. Its nearest rivals list is empty, its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile stands at the default 50th percentile. The database records no wins for either processor in head-to-head testing, so the largest measurable advantages belong solely to the Ryzen 3 210's individual results. The biggest single score for the AMD part is the PassMark data compression result at 152,017, followed by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score at 11,198. The smallest recorded score is the PassMark find prime numbers result at 49, which is typical for that benchmark's scale.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 3 210 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Ryzen 3 210 has an average benchmark score of 17,321. Its closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 at 17,333, a delta of -0.1 percent, meaning the Ryzen 5 4500 is effectively tied with it. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 17,278, a 0.2 percent delta in favor of the Ryzen 3 210. The Intel Core 7 150U scores 17,395, putting it 0.4 percent ahead, and the Intel Core i5-12450H scores 17,239, putting it 0.5 percent behind.

Q: What is the Ryzen 3 210's best benchmark result?

A: The highest recorded score for the Ryzen 3 210 is the PassMark data compression result at 152,017 points. The next highest is the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,198, followed by the PassMark integer math score of 37,933.

Q: Does the Snapdragon X1E-80-100 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has an empty benchmark list, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals. Its percentile ranking is recorded as 50, which is the default value for CPUs without measured data.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for both processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads. The Snapdragon part has three times the core count, but the database has no benchmark results to show how that core count performs in practice.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has a TDP of 28 W, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has a TDP of 35 W. The Snapdragon part is rated for 7 W higher power consumption, which may indicate a higher sustained power envelope, but no thermal or power measurements are recorded in the database.

Q: What memory types do the two processors support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 supports LPDDR5X memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. The Snapdragon part has a 45.6 GB/s higher memory bandwidth figure.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their architectural designs. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 uses the Oryon codename with no listed architecture family, also manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, but the database records no transistor count or die size for it.

The cache hierarchies differ markedly. The Ryzen 3 210 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon part has substantially more L1 and L2 cache, while the Ryzen part has more L3 cache. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and both have locked multipliers.

The integrated graphics also differ. The Ryzen 3 210 includes the Radeon 740M, while the Snapdragon X1E-80-100 includes the Adreno X1-85. The Ryzen part uses the AMD Socket FP7, and the Snapdragon part uses Qualcomm BGA 2073. Both are mobile-market segments with active production status. The Ryzen 3 210 was released on January 5, 2025, while the Snapdragon X1E-80-100 was released on April 23, 2024. The Ryzen part has a part number of 100-000001612, and the Snapdragon part has a part number of X1E80100.

PCIe support shows a slight difference: the Ryzen 3 210 provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes, while the Snapdragon X1E-80-100 provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes. The Ryzen part has 2 more PCIe lanes. The base clocks are 3.00 GHz for the Ryzen and 3.40 GHz for the Snapdragon, while boost clocks are 4.70 GHz for the Ryzen and 4.00 GHz for the Snapdragon. The Ryzen part has a higher boost clock by 0.70 GHz, while the Snapdragon part has a higher base clock by 0.40 GHz. The Ryzen part uses 8 threads across 4 cores, while the Snapdragon part uses 12 threads across 12 cores, meaning the Snapdragon has no simultaneous multithreading.