AMD Ryzen 3 210 vs Intel Core i7-1260P Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head comparison between the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and the Intel Core i7-1260P shows a clear split in performance characteristics. The Intel part wins 13 of the 17 recorded benchmark comparisons, while the AMD processor takes the remaining 4. The overall average benchmark score sits at 17321 for the Ryzen 3 210 and 17007 for the Core i7-1260P, a margin of roughly 1.8% in favor of the AMD chip, despite the Intel part's larger share of individual test wins.

The most decisive Intel victories come in floating-point and integer math workloads. In PassMark floating-point math, the Core i7-1260P scores 42417 against 23649 for the Ryzen 3 210, a delta of -44.2% from the AMD part's perspective. Integer math shows a similar pattern: 62316 versus 37933, with the Intel part ahead by 39.1%. These are the two largest margins in the entire comparison, and they point to a substantial advantage in raw computational throughput for the Intel design.

Cinebench R15 and R20 results also favor Intel, though by smaller margins. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core i7-1260P posts 1626 versus 1128, a 30.6% lead. The single-core R15 test shows Intel ahead by 34.6% (243 versus 159). Cinebench R20 multicore and single-core both show a 19.9% Intel advantage, with scores of 5874 versus 4703 and 829 versus 664, respectively.

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 counters in Cinebench R23 multicore, where it scores 11198 against 9711, a 15.3% lead. This is a notable reversal, as the R23 multicore test is often considered a more modern and demanding workload than R15 or R20. The AMD part also wins PassMark single-thread with 3724 versus 3250, a 14.6% margin, and PassMark extended instructions with 11464 versus 10493, a 9.3% lead.

In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel part takes a narrower 9% win (1737.5 versus 1581). Other Intel wins include PassMark data compression (182968 versus 152017, a 16.9% lead), data encryption (11238 versus 8607, a 23.4% lead), find prime numbers (63 versus 49, a 22.2% lead), multithread (16775 versus 13585, a 19% lead), physics (1092 versus 821, a 24.8% lead), and random string sorting (20586 versus 19454, a 5.5% lead).

Where Each One Wins

The Core i7-1260P dominates heavily in multi-threaded, math-heavy, and encryption workloads. Its 12 cores and 16 threads give it a structural advantage in parallel tasks, which shows in the floating-point and integer math results, the physics simulation score, and the data encryption and compression benchmarks. For users running CPU-bound productivity tasks that scale across cores, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or large spreadsheet calculations, the Intel part is the clear choice based on the recorded data.

The Ryzen 3 210 wins in Cinebench R23 multicore, PassMark single-thread, and PassMark extended instructions. The single-thread win is particularly interesting because the Intel part actually leads in Cinebench R23 single-core (1737.5 versus 1581), suggesting the two processors respond differently to different single-threaded test methodologies. The extended instructions win indicates that the AMD part handles certain SIMD or specialized instruction sets more efficiently. The R23 multicore win, despite the Intel part having more cores, suggests that the Zen 4 architecture's efficiency can overcome a core-count deficit in certain workloads.

For mixed usage, the data shows a tradeoff. The Intel part is stronger in most raw throughput tests, but the AMD part holds its own in single-threaded PassMark tests and in the R23 multicore workload. The overall average benchmark scores are close enough (17321 versus 17007) that neither part is a universal winner.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 17321, compared to 17007 for the Intel Core i7-1260P.

Q: How large is the Intel Core i7-1260P's lead in floating-point math?

A: The Intel part scores 42417 in PassMark floating-point math, which is 44.2% higher than the AMD part's 23649.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 210 win any multi-threaded benchmarks?

A: Yes, it wins Cinebench R23 multicore with a score of 11198, which is 15.3% higher than the Intel part's 9711.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-threaded performance?

A: The results are mixed. The AMD part wins PassMark single-thread (3724 versus 3250, a 14.6% lead), but the Intel part wins Cinebench R23 single-core (1737.5 versus 1581, a 9% lead) and Cinebench R15 single-core (243 versus 159, a 34.6% lead).

Q: What is the difference in the number of wins between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-1260P wins 13 of the 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen 3 210 wins 4.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 ranks at the 71st percentile, while the Intel Core i7-1260P ranks at the 70th percentile.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core i7-1260P has 12 cores and 16 threads. Base clock speeds differ substantially: the AMD part runs at 3.00 GHz, the Intel part at 2.10 GHz. Both reach a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Both are rated at a TDP of 28 watts.

The socket and platform differ completely. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1744. Memory support also diverges: the AMD part supports only DDR5, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part has a rated memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. PCIe lane counts differ as well, with the AMD part offering Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only) and the Intel part offering Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

Process node and foundry differ. The AMD part is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD part has a transistor count of 20,900 million and a die size of 137 mm², while the Intel part has no recorded transistor count and a die size of 217 mm².

Release dates differ significantly. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 was released on 2025-01-05, while the Intel Core i7-1260P was released on 2022-02-22. Both parts are currently marked as Active in production status, and neither has a launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is stark. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 is based on Zen 4, with the codename Hawk Point, while the Intel Core i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake, with the codename Alder Lake-P. The AMD part is a 4 nm TSMC design, while the Intel part is a 10 nm Intel design.

Cache configurations differ considerably. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's larger L3 cache (18 MB versus 8 MB) aligns with its higher core count.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD part features the Radeon 740M, while the Intel part features the Iris Xe 96EU. Both are mobile-oriented integrated solutions, but the recorded data does not include any graphics benchmark comparisons.

The core topology is a major difference. The Intel part's 12 cores and 16 threads suggest a hybrid architecture with performance and efficiency cores, a hallmark of Alder Lake designs. The AMD part's 4 cores and 8 threads represent a more traditional uniform core arrangement. Neither part has an unlocked multiplier, and neither supports ECC memory.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion: the Intel Core i7-1260P is the stronger choice for most multi-threaded and math-intensive workloads. Its 13 wins out of 17 comparisons, including dominant showings in floating-point math (44.2% ahead) and integer math (39.1% ahead), make it the better option for users who prioritize raw computational throughput in parallel tasks. The larger core count, larger L3 cache, and wider PCIe lane support reinforce this positioning.

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 is the better choice for users who value single-threaded PassMark performance and the specific Cinebench R23 multicore workload. Its 14.6% lead in PassMark single-thread and 15.3% lead in R23 multicore suggest that the Zen 4 architecture delivers strong per-core efficiency. The smaller die size and more recent release date also indicate a newer design.

For a mobile platform, the choice depends on workload profile. The Intel part is the superior option for rendering, encoding, and heavy multitasking. The AMD part is the better option for scenarios where Cinebench R23 multicore performance or PassMark single-thread performance matters most. The overall average scores are close enough that either processor would serve well, but the Intel part's broader set of wins gives it the edge for general-purpose use.