AMD Ryzen 3 210 vs Intel Core 5 223PTE Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 3 210 compare to the Intel Core 5 223PTE in core and thread counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 boosts up to 4.70 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE boosts up to 5.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has an average benchmark score of 17321, placing it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has no recorded benchmark scores and an average score of 0, placing it in the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the process nodes and foundries for these chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the difference in their PCIe capabilities?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), whereas the Intel Core 5 223PTE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent distinct architectural approaches from their respective manufacturers. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 is built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point, and is manufactured on a 4 nm process node by TSMC. This is a relatively modern, dense process that contributes to the chip's power efficiency. The Intel Core 5 223PTE, conversely, is based on the Bartlett Lake codename and uses a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundries. The difference in process technology is significant: the AMD chip uses a smaller node, which typically allows for higher transistor density and lower power draw per unit of performance.

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 is a mobile-focused part, as indicated by its market segment classification and its socket, AMD Socket FP7. It integrates a Radeon 740M graphics solution. The Intel Core 5 223PTE is a desktop processor, using Intel Socket 1700, and features UHD Graphics 770. The AMD chip's transistor count is listed at 20,900 million with a die size of 137 mm², while the Intel chip's transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

Cache hierarchies also differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has larger per-core allocations: 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a much larger 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the Intel part a considerable cache advantage, particularly in the shared L3 pool, which can benefit workloads with high data reuse.

Both chips support dual-channel memory and share the same memory bandwidth figure of 89.6 GB/s, but the AMD part supports only DDR5, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The Intel chip also supports ECC memory, which the AMD chip does not. The power envelopes are notably different: the AMD Ryzen 3 210 has a TDP of 28 watts, whereas the Intel Core 5 223PTE has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel chip also has a higher boost clock, reaching 5.40 GHz versus the AMD chip's 4.70 GHz, and a lower base clock of 2.30 GHz versus 3.00 GHz on the AMD side.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark data in the database only covers the AMD Ryzen 3 210, as the Intel Core 5 223PTE has no benchmark entries. Therefore, the analysis of winning scenarios is based on the strengths indicated by the AMD chip's scores and the architectural differences between the two.

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 shows strong performance across a range of synthetic workloads. Its average benchmark score of 17321 and 71st percentile ranking indicate a capable processor. In the PassMark suite, the chip scores 37933 in integer math, 23649 in floating point math, and 152017 in data compression. These results suggest that the AMD part handles compute-intensive tasks and data manipulation effectively. The single-thread score of 3724 in PassMark, along with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1581, indicates solid per-core performance, which is relevant for lightly threaded applications.

The Intel Core 5 223PTE, despite lacking benchmark scores, has several architectural advantages that point to potential wins. It has double the core count (8 versus 4) and double the thread count (16 versus 8). The larger 24 MB L3 cache, compared to 8 MB on the AMD chip, suggests an edge in workloads with large working sets. The higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz also gives the Intel chip a theoretical advantage in single-threaded tasks that scale with clock speed. The Intel part's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory and its ECC capability make it more flexible for certain server or workstation scenarios where memory reliability is a priority.

The AMD chip's lower TDP of 28 watts compared to 45 watts for the Intel chip indicates that the AMD part may be preferable in power-constrained or thermally limited environments, such as thin-and-light mobile devices. The AMD chip's integrated Radeon 740M graphics may offer different graphical capabilities compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 770, though no benchmark data is available to quantify this.

Specification Differences

The following table summarizes the key specification differences between the two processors, based solely on the recorded data.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 210 | Intel Core 5 223PTE |

|----------------|-----------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 8 |

| Threads | 8 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 2.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 Cache (per core) | 64 KB | 80 KB |

| L2 Cache (per core) | 1 MB | 2 MB |

| L3 Cache (shared) | 8 MB | 24 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 740M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $232 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data is empty, and the Intel Core 5 223PTE has no recorded benchmark scores. Consequently, a direct comparison of measured performance numbers is not possible from the database. The only benchmark results available are for the AMD Ryzen 3 210, which provides a baseline for what the chip achieves but offers no points of comparison against the Intel part.

For the AMD Ryzen 3 210, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 11198 and the single-core score is 1581. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 4703 and the single-core score is 664. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 1128, and the single-core score is 159. These scores show a consistent pattern of performance across different versions of the rendering workload, with the multi-core scores scaling appropriately with the 4-core, 8-thread configuration.

In the PassMark suite, the AMD chip shows strong results in several specific tests. The data compression score is 152017, which is particularly high. The data encryption score is 8607, and the extended instructions score is 11464. The find prime numbers score is 49, which is a relatively low figure. The floating point math score is 23649, and the integer math score is 37933. The multithread score is 13585, the physics score is 821, and the random string sorting score is 19454. The single thread score is 3724.

Given the lack of data for the Intel Core 5 223PTE, the analysis cannot assign wins to either processor based on benchmark results. The database records zero wins for each side in the head-to-head comparison. The Intel chip's average benchmark score is 0, which aligns with the absence of any benchmark entries. The AMD chip's percentile ranking of 71 versus the Intel chip's 50 is based on the overall distribution of all CPUs in the database, but since the Intel chip has no measured performance, this ranking appears to be a default value rather than a reflection of tested results.

The architectural differences provide the only basis for qualitative inference. The Intel part's higher core count, larger cache, and higher boost clock suggest it would likely outperform the AMD chip in heavily multithreaded workloads and in tasks that benefit from large caches. The AMD chip's lower TDP and smaller process node suggest it may deliver better performance per watt, though no power efficiency benchmarks are available. The database currently offers a partial picture, with the AMD Ryzen 3 210 fully characterized and the Intel Core 5 223PTE defined by specifications alone. Future benchmark entries for the Intel part would be necessary to establish a measured performance comparison.