AMD Ryzen 3 210 vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct comparison between the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and the Intel Core 3 201TE is limited by the available data. The database contains a full set of benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen 3 210, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark results. Consequently, the head-to-head section relies entirely on the AMD processor's measured performance and the Intel processor's specification-level characteristics.

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,198 and a single-core score of 1,581. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 4,703 and the single-core result is 664. The older Cinebench R15 test shows a multi-core score of 1,128 and a single-core score of 159. These figures establish a baseline for the AMD part, but without Intel Core 3 201TE benchmark scores, no direct numerical delta can be calculated between the two processors.

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 17,321. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 with an average score of 17,333 (a delta of -0.1 percent), the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G at 17,278 (a delta of 0.2 percent), the Intel Core 7 150U at 17,395 (a delta of -0.4 percent), and the Intel Core i5-12450H at 17,239 (a delta of 0.5 percent). The Ryzen 3 210 essentially trades blows with these processors, trailing the Ryzen 5 4500 by a negligible margin and edging ahead of the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and Core i5-12450H by similarly small amounts. The Intel Core 3 201TE, by contrast, has no recorded average benchmark score and sits at the 50th percentile, indicating an absence of performance data rather than a measured competitive position.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 shows clear strengths across its benchmark suite. In PassMark tests, the multi-thread score is 13,585, the single-thread score is 3,724, and the floating point math score is 23,649. Integer math reaches 37,933, while extended instructions score 11,464. Data compression completes at 152,017, and data encryption records 8,607. Random string sorting achieves 19,454, and find prime numbers scores 49. Physics processing scores 821. These results indicate a processor capable of handling both lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads, with particularly strong integer and floating point math performance relative to its class.

The Intel Core 3 201TE offers no benchmark data, so any assessment of where it wins must be inferred from its specification sheet. The Intel part uses a 45 watt TDP, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 210's 28 watt TDP. This suggests the Intel processor may sustain higher power draw, but the database records no performance measurements to confirm any resulting advantage. The Intel Core 3 201TE supports ECC memory, which the AMD Ryzen 3 210 does not, and it offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes compared to the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes. These features favor the Intel processor in specific enterprise or expansion-heavy scenarios, but they do not translate into recorded benchmark victories.

The AMD Ryzen 3 210's integrated graphics, the Radeon 740M, and the Intel Core 3 201TE's UHD Graphics 730, are both present, but no graphics benchmarks exist in the database for either processor. The AMD processor's memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor's is 76.8 GB/s, a difference that favors the AMD part in memory-bound workloads, though no direct test confirms this advantage.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 3 210 is the only processor with measurable performance. Its average benchmark score of 17,321 places it in the 71st percentile, and its nearest rivals all fall within a range of -0.4 percent to 0.5 percent of its score, which indicates that the Ryzen 3 210 is competitive with established mid-range processors like the Intel Core i5-12450H and the AMD Ryzen 5 4500. The Intel Core 3 201TE has no benchmark scores, an average score of zero, and sits at the 50th percentile, which in the database context means its performance position is unverified rather than average.

Users who require a processor with proven multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, as demonstrated by the Cinebench and PassMark scores, should select the AMD Ryzen 3 210. Users who need ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, or a desktop-oriented Socket 1700 platform would look to the Intel Core 3 201TE, but they must accept that its performance is undocumented in the database. The data does not support a performance victory for Intel, as no wins are recorded for either side and the benchmark comparison table is empty.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specification fields. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The AMD part uses a 28 watt TDP, whereas the Intel part uses a 45 watt TDP. The sockets differ: AMD Socket FP7 for the Ryzen 3 210 and Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 3 201TE. The process nodes differ, with the AMD processor at 4 nm and the Intel processor at 10 nm. The AMD processor is built by TSMC, while the Intel processor is built by Intel.

Memory support differs: the AMD Ryzen 3 210 supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 3 201TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is higher on the AMD side at 89.6 GB/s, compared to 76.8 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory is not supported by the AMD processor but is supported by the Intel processor. PCIe connectivity differs, with the AMD part offering Gen 4 and 14 lanes, while the Intel part offers Gen 5 and 16 lanes. The integrated graphics are different: Radeon 740M for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. The market segments also differ, with the AMD processor classified as Mobile and the Intel processor classified as Desktop. The release dates are close, with the AMD processor on January 5, 2025, and the Intel processor on January 12, 2025. The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $134. The AMD processor has no listed launch MSRP. The die size is 137 mm² for AMD and 163 mm² for Intel, and the AMD processor has 20,900 million transistors, while the Intel processor has no listed transistor count.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 3 210?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has an average benchmark score of 17,321.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 201TE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database contains no benchmark results for the Intel Core 3 201TE, and its average benchmark score is zero.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 3 210 does not.

Q: What are the TDP values for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has a TDP of 28 watts, and the Intel Core 3 201TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: How do the two processors compare in memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs, and the Intel Core 3 201TE sits at the 50th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 uses the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Hawk Point and belongs to the Ryzen 3 generation. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 20,900 million transistors and a die size of 137 mm². Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports 4 cores and 8 threads, and its integrated graphics are the Radeon 740M.

The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 163 mm², and no transistor count is listed. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor also supports 4 cores and 8 threads, and its integrated graphics are the UHD Graphics 730.

The cache differences are notable: the Intel processor has larger L1 and L2 caches per core and a larger shared L3 cache, while the AMD processor uses a smaller process node and a smaller die. The AMD processor lists a transistor count, which the Intel processor does not. The AMD part is designed for mobile platforms with Socket FP7, while the Intel part targets desktop platforms with Socket 1700. Both processors are unlocked, but neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD processor has a part number of 100-000001612, and the Intel processor has a part number of SRPKDQ5CK.