AMD Ryzen 3 210 vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and the Intel Arc G3. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and no win counts are recorded for either processor. This means a side-by-side performance comparison cannot be constructed from the recorded data alone. However, the available measurements for the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and the architectural specifications for both parts allow for an indirect assessment.

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,198 and a single-core score of 1,581. In Cinebench R20, it posts 4,703 multi-core and 664 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 results show 1,128 multi-core and 159 single-core. PassMark tests further characterize the Ryzen 3 210: multi-threaded performance scores 13,585, single-thread performance scores 3,724, integer math scores 37,933, floating-point math scores 23,649, and data encryption scores 8,607. The processor also achieves 152,017 in data compression and 19,454 in random string sorting. Physics calculations score 821, while extended instructions score 11,464. Prime number finding scores 49.

The Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and its nearest rivals list is empty. Therefore, any direct numerical comparison between the two processors is impossible from the data provided. The Ryzen 3 210 has a percentile ranking of 71 among all CPUs, placing it above the Intel Arc G3, which ranks at the 50th percentile. The Ryzen 3 210 also holds an average benchmark score of 17,321, while the Arc G3 has no recorded average.

Where Each One Wins

For the AMD Ryzen 3 210, the recorded benchmarks demonstrate strengths across several compute-heavy workloads. The high PassMark integer math score of 37,933 indicates solid performance in general arithmetic and logic operations. Floating-point math at 23,649 similarly shows capability in scientific and graphical calculations. Data compression at 152,017 is a particularly strong result, suggesting efficiency in file archiving and data throughput tasks. The multi-thread score of 13,585 reflects good scaling across its 4 cores and 8 threads, which is further supported by the Cinebench multi-core results.

The Intel Arc G3, lacking any benchmark entries, cannot be assigned wins in any specific workload from the database. Its specifications do suggest potential advantages in certain areas, but without measured scores, those remain unverified. The Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads, which is a higher core count than the Ryzen 3 210, and it uses a newer 3 nm process node from Intel, compared to the 4 nm TSMC node for the Ryzen. Its cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3, all larger than the Ryzen 3 210's 64 KB L1, 1 MB L2, and 8 MB L3. Memory bandwidth for the Arc G3 is listed at 136.5 GB/s with LPDDR5X support, versus 89.6 GB/s with DDR5 for the Ryzen. These architectural traits may translate to wins in memory-intensive or heavily multithreaded scenarios, but the data does not confirm any specific victory.

The Ryzen 3 210 also offers integrated Radeon 740M graphics, while the Arc G3 includes Arc B370 integrated graphics. Neither has been benchmarked in the database, so graphical performance cannot be compared.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 is built on Zen 4 architecture with the codename Hawk Point, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It contains 20,900 million transistors on a die size of 137 mm². The Intel Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake codename, built on a 3 nm process at Intel Foundry. No transistor count or die size is recorded for the Arc G3.

The Ryzen 3 210 features 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Ryzen has a thermal design power of 28 watts, while the Arc G3 is rated at 25 watts. Both are mobile processors, with the Ryzen using AMD Socket FP7 and the Arc G3 using Intel BGA 2540.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The Ryzen 3 210 uses 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Arc G3 uses 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. Memory support also diverges: the Ryzen supports DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Arc G3 supports LPDDR5X with dual-channel configuration and 136.5 GB/s bandwidth. Neither processor supports ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the Ryzen offers Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Arc G3 offers Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only).

Both processors have integrated graphics, with the Ryzen featuring Radeon 740M and the Arc G3 featuring Arc B370. The Ryzen 3 210 was released on January 5, 2025, while the Arc G3 has a release date of May 27, 2026. Both are listed as active in production. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Ryzen part number is 100-000001612, and the Arc G3 part number is SA4QZ.

FAQ

Q: What is the core count difference between the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and the Intel Arc G3?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Arc G3's 4.60 GHz.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare between the two?

A: The Intel Arc G3 supports LPDDR5X with 136.5 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD Ryzen 3 210 supports DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the process nodes for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Arc G3 is built on a 3 nm process at Intel.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 ranks at the 71st percentile, while the Intel Arc G3 ranks at the 50th percentile.

Q: Are there any recorded benchmark scores for the Intel Arc G3?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark scores for the Intel Arc G3, and its average benchmark score is zero.

The Verdict

From the data available, the AMD Ryzen 3 210 is the only processor with measured performance results. Its average benchmark score of 17,321 places it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 (average score 17,333, delta 0.1% lower), the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G (17,278, delta 0.2% higher), the Intel Core 7 150U (17,395, delta 0.4% lower), and the Intel Core i5-12450H (17,239, delta 0.5% higher). These deltas indicate that the Ryzen 3 210 performs within a narrow band of comparable mobile processors.

The Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark data and cannot be evaluated on performance grounds. Its architectural specifications, including a higher core count, larger cache, faster memory bandwidth, and a newer process node, may suggest potential advantages in multithreaded or memory-intensive workloads. However, the database provides no evidence of actual performance.

For users selecting between these two, the Ryzen 3 210 is the only option with verified performance metrics. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,198 and single-core score of 1,581, along with strong PassMark results in compression and encryption, establish it as a capable mobile processor. The Arc G3 remains an unmeasured entry, so any claims about its relative performance would be speculative. The recorded data clearly favors the Ryzen 3 210 due to the presence of benchmark results, while the Arc G3's lack of scores leaves its capabilities unconfirmed.