AMD Ryzen 3 210 vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a complete sweep in favor of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 across all 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The Ryzen 3 210 does not claim a single win, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 takes every test. The margin varies widely, from a narrow single-thread edge to a dominant floating-point advantage.

The largest gap appears in PassMark floating point math, where the Ryzen AI 7 345 scores 42621 against 23649 for the Ryzen 3 210, a delta of -44.5 percent. That is nearly double the output in a workload heavily dependent on arithmetic throughput. Integer math follows a similar pattern: 63475 versus 37933, a -40.2 percent delta. These two results indicate a substantial raw compute advantage for the six-core part.

Data compression shows the second-largest percentage gap. The Ryzen AI 7 345 records 237484, while the Ryzen 3 210 manages 152017, a -36 percent delta. Encryption follows at -27.1 percent, with scores of 11814 and 8607 respectively. Extended instructions show a -32.6 percent gap, with 17003 against 11464.

The Cinebench results tell a more nuanced story. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen AI 7 345 scores 11461 versus 11198 for the Ryzen 3 210, a modest -2.3 percent delta. This is the closest multi-threaded result in the entire comparison, suggesting that the 8 MB L3 cache and higher boost clock of the Ryzen 3 210 partially compensate for its fewer cores in this specific workload. However, Cinebench R23 single-core shows a clearer separation: 1818 versus 1581, a -13 percent delta.

The older Cinebench R15 tests amplify the differences. Multi-core shows 1712 versus 1128, a -34.1 percent delta, and single-core shows 271 versus 159, a -41.3 percent delta. These older benchmarks appear to be more sensitive to core count and thread scheduling.

PassMark multi-thread scores 19927 for the Ryzen AI 7 345 versus 13585 for the Ryzen 3 210, a -31.8 percent delta. Physics tests show 1089 versus 821, a -24.6 percent delta. Random string sorting records 25435 versus 19454, a -23.5 percent delta. Prime number finding shows 62 versus 49, a -21 percent delta.

The smallest gap is in PassMark single-thread performance: 3875 versus 3724, a -3.9 percent delta. This indicates that in lightly threaded tasks, the two processors are much closer, with the Ryzen AI 7 345 holding a slight edge despite its lower 2.00 GHz base clock. The Ryzen 3 210 counters with a 4.70 GHz boost clock versus 4.60 GHz, yet still trails in this metric.

The overall average benchmark scores reflect the hierarchy. The Ryzen AI 7 345 posts 29461, while the Ryzen 3 210 posts 17321. The percentile rankings place the Ryzen AI 7 345 at the 81st percentile against all CPUs, while the Ryzen 3 210 sits at the 71st percentile.

FAQ

Q: Does the Ryzen 3 210 win any benchmark in the head-to-head comparison?

A: No. The database records 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, and the Ryzen AI 7 345 wins all 15. The Ryzen 3 210 records zero wins.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: PassMark floating point math shows the biggest delta at -44.5 percent, with the Ryzen AI 7 345 scoring 42621 against 23649 for the Ryzen 3 210.

Q: How close are the two in single-thread performance?

A: PassMark single-thread shows the Ryzen AI 7 345 at 3875 and the Ryzen 3 210 at 3724, a -3.9 percent delta. Cinebench R23 single-core shows 1818 versus 1581, a -13 percent delta.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 345 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 210 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each processor?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 345 records an average benchmark score of 29461, and the Ryzen 3 210 records 17321.

Q: How does the Ryzen 3 210 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The database lists the Ryzen 5 4500 at 17333 with a -0.1 percent delta, the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G at 17278 with a 0.2 percent delta, the Intel Core 7 150U at 17395 with a -0.4 percent delta, and the Intel Core i5-12450H at 17239 with a 0.5 percent delta.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations. The Ryzen 3 210 uses Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 uses a hybrid arrangement listed as Zen 5 / Zen 5c under the Krackan Point codename. Both are manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, but the transistor counts and die sizes differ: the Ryzen 3 210 has 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 does not have recorded transistor or die size figures in the database.

Cache hierarchies diverge significantly. The Ryzen 3 210 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Ryzen AI 7 345 has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and only 4 MB of L3. The smaller L3 on the Ryzen AI 7 345 is notable, yet the processor still outperforms in aggregate workloads, indicating that core count and newer architecture compensate for the reduced cache capacity.

Both processors support DDR5 memory with dual-channel buses and identical 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. Neither supports ECC memory. Both use PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ: the Ryzen 3 210 includes Radeon 740M, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 includes Radeon 840M.

The sockets differ. The Ryzen 3 210 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 uses AMD Socket FP8. Both are unlocked multipliers set to false and target the mobile market segment. Both are listed as Active production status. The Ryzen 3 210 released on 2025-01-05, and the Ryzen AI 7 345 released on 2025-01-14.

The memory support specification also differs. The Ryzen 3 210 lists only DDR5, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 lists DDR5 and LPDDR5X. This gives the newer part additional memory flexibility for low-power mobile designs.

Specification Differences

The core count differs: 4 cores for the Ryzen 3 210 versus 6 cores for the Ryzen AI 7 345. Thread counts follow: 8 threads versus 12 threads. Base clocks differ substantially, with the Ryzen 3 210 at 3.00 GHz and the Ryzen AI 7 345 at 2.00 GHz. Boost clocks are closer: 4.70 GHz versus 4.60 GHz.

The TDP is identical at 28 for both processors. The sockets differ as noted, with FP7 versus FP8. The architecture field differs: Zen 4 for the Ryzen 3 210, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 leaves the architecture field unrecorded but lists its codename generation as Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c).

Process node and foundry are the same: 4 nm and TSMC. Transistor count and die size are recorded only for the Ryzen 3 210. L1 cache per core differs at 64 KB versus 80 KB. L3 cache differs at 8 MB shared versus 4 MB. Memory support differs as noted, with the Ryzen AI 7 345 adding LPDDR5X.

The integrated graphics differ: Radeon 740M versus Radeon 840M. Part numbers differ: 100-000001612 for the Ryzen 3 210 and 100-000002122 for the Ryzen AI 7 345. Release dates differ by nine days. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen AI 7 345 wins every recorded benchmark, so the use-case split is largely determined by the magnitude of its advantages rather than any reversal of results. In multi-threaded and compute-heavy workloads, the Ryzen AI 7 345 holds decisive margins. Floating point math, integer math, data compression, and encryption all show gaps of at least 27 percent in its favor. These workloads benefit directly from the additional 2 cores and 4 threads.

The Ryzen 3 210 has no benchmark wins, but its closest margins indicate where it remains competitive. PassMark single-thread shows only a -3.9 percent delta, and Cinebench R23 multi-core shows only a -2.3 percent delta. In lightly threaded tasks or in specific rendering workloads that favor its larger 8 MB L3 cache, the Ryzen 3 210 narrows the gap considerably. Its higher base clock of 3.00 GHz versus 2.00 GHz may contribute to the relatively smaller single-thread deficit.

For workloads dominated by memory bandwidth, both processors are effectively equal, with identical 89.6 GB/s figures. The dual-channel DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes are the same on both parts. The Ryzen AI 7 345 adds LPDDR5X memory support, which could matter in power-sensitive mobile designs.

The Ryzen 3 210 also offers a smaller physical footprint at 137 mm², which may be preferable in compact systems where die size is a design constraint. However, the database does not record die size for the Ryzen AI 7 345, so a direct comparison is not possible.

The Verdict

The data points decisively to the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 for any user prioritizing raw performance. It wins all 15 head-to-head benchmarks, posts an average score of 29461 versus 17321, and sits at the 81st percentile versus the 71st percentile for the Ryzen 3 210. The largest advantages appear in floating point math (-44.5 percent), integer math (-40.2 percent), and data compression (-36 percent), all of which indicate a substantially stronger multi-threaded throughput.

The Ryzen 3 210 remains a viable option in specific scenarios. Its closest margins, single-thread at -3.9 percent and Cinebench R23 multi-core at -2.3 percent, show that it can nearly match the Ryzen AI 7 345 in certain light workloads. Its higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz and larger 8 MB L3 cache may explain these narrower gaps. For users whose workloads are primarily single-threaded or rely on the specific Cinebench R23 rendering path, the Ryzen 3 210 delivers a competitive experience at a lower core count.

The Ryzen AI 7 345 offers twice the threads (12 versus 8), a newer Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid architecture, and LPDDR5X memory support. The Ryzen 3 210 counters with a higher base clock, a smaller die, and a larger L3 cache. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP, so the database does not provide a price-based comparison.

The nearest rival data places each processor in its respective performance tier. The Ryzen 3 210 trades nearly evenly with the Ryzen 5 4500 (-0.1 percent), Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G (0.2 percent), Intel Core 7 150U (-0.4 percent), and Intel Core i5-12450H (0.5 percent). The Ryzen AI 7 345 matches the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X (0 percent delta), sits slightly behind the AMD EPYC 9654 (0.2 percent), trails the Intel Core i5-13500HX (0.7 percent), and leads the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (-0.7 percent). These figures confirm that the Ryzen AI 7 345 operates in a higher performance class altogether.

The decision rests on workload requirements. The Ryzen AI 7 345 is the clear choice for multi-threaded compute, data processing, and any task that leverages its six cores and twelve threads. The Ryzen 3 210 suits lighter duty, where its smaller footprint, higher base clock, and larger L3 cache provide adequate performance with a narrower gap in the benchmarks it approaches most closely.