AMD Ryzen 3 210 vs AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D Comparison

AMD Ryzen 3 210 vs AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D

The comparison between the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D is not a conventional head-to-head matchup. The database contains a complete benchmark profile for the Ryzen 3 210, with scores across Cinebench and Passmark tests, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D has no recorded benchmark results. The Ryzen 3 210 sits in the 71st percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 17,321. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 with an average score of 17,333, which is 0.1% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G at 17,278, which is 0.2% lower. The Intel Core 7 150U scores 17,395, which is 0.4% higher, and the Intel Core i5-12450H scores 17,239, which is 0.5% lower. These close margins indicate that the Ryzen 3 210 performs in a tightly packed cluster of mid-range processors.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Since the database has no direct head-to-head measurements for these two processors, the analysis relies on the recorded scores of the Ryzen 3 210 and the specification data for both. The Ryzen 3 210 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,198 and a single-core score of 1,581. In Cinebench R20, it scores 4,703 multi-core and 664 single-core. The Cinebench R15 results show 1,128 multi-core and 159 single-core. Passmark results for the Ryzen 3 210 include a multi-thread score of 13,585 and a single-thread score of 3,724. Data compression reaches 152,017, while data encryption scores 8,607. Extended instructions score 11,464, and prime number finding scores 49. Floating point math reaches 23,649, integer math reaches 37,933, physics scores 821, and random string sorting scores 19,454.

The Ryzen 7 7700X3D has no benchmark entries in the database, so its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50. This means the database cannot confirm any performance advantage for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D in any test. The Ryzen 3 210, by contrast, has a percentile of 71, which places it above the 50th percentile baseline assigned to the Ryzen 7 7700X3D. The absence of data for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D does not imply inferiority, but it does mean that no measured comparison is possible. The Ryzen 3 210’s nearest rivals, all within a 0.5% average score range, show that its performance level is competitive with other mid-range parts, but none of those rivals is the Ryzen 7 7700X3D.

FAQ

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 7700X3D have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D has an empty benchmark list, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rivals recorded. The Ryzen 3 210 has 17 benchmark entries.

Q: How does the Ryzen 3 210 compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 4500?

A: The Ryzen 5 4500 has an average score of 17,333, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 3 210’s 17,321. This is a negligible difference, placing the two processors at essentially the same performance level.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor?

A: The Ryzen 3 210 is in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D is in the 50th percentile. The 50th percentile for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D reflects its lack of measured data rather than a tested result.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen 3 210 has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Ryzen 3 210 also has a lower base clock of 3.00 GHz compared to 4.00 GHz for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Ryzen 3 210 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D has double the core and thread count.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700X3D has 96 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Ryzen 3 210 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D therefore has 12 times the L3 cache capacity.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Ryzen 3 210 is a fully measured processor with a strong set of benchmark results, placing it in the 71st percentile. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D, however, has no recorded benchmark scores, giving it a 50th percentile and an average score of zero. For any user who relies on measured performance data, only the Ryzen 3 210 can be assessed. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D’s specifications suggest a higher-end part: 8 cores, 16 threads, 96 MB of L3 cache, and a 120 W TDP. The Ryzen 3 210 offers 4 cores, 8 threads, 8 MB of L3 cache, and a 28 W TDP. These are substantial specification differences, but without benchmark scores for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D, the database cannot confirm how those specifications translate into performance. The Ryzen 3 210’s average score of 17,321 and its close rivalry with the Ryzen 5 4500 and Intel Core i5-12450H indicate that it performs at a mid-range level. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D, based on its core count, cache size, and desktop socket, is positioned as a more capable part, but the data does not include any verification of that positioning.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every specification field. The Ryzen 3 210 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D has 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock of the Ryzen 3 210 is 3.00 GHz, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D has a base clock of 4.00 GHz. The boost clock is 4.70 GHz for the Ryzen 3 210 and 4.50 GHz for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D. The thermal design power is 28 W for the Ryzen 3 210 and 120 W for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D. The socket types differ: the Ryzen 3 210 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D uses AMD Socket AM5. The process node is 4 nm for the Ryzen 3 210 and 5 nm for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D. The Ryzen 3 210 has 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D has 11,270 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. L3 cache is 8 MB shared for the Ryzen 3 210 and 96 MB shared for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for the Ryzen 3 210 and 83.2 GB/s for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D. ECC memory support is false for the Ryzen 3 210 and true for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 14 lanes for the Ryzen 3 210 and Gen 5 with 24 lanes for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D. The integrated graphics are Radeon 740M for the Ryzen 3 210 and Radeon Graphics for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D. The market segment is Mobile for the Ryzen 3 210 and Desktop for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D. The release date is 2025-01-05 for the Ryzen 3 210 and 2026-05-30 for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D has a launch MSRP of $329, while the Ryzen 3 210 has no recorded launch MSRP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Ryzen 3 210 is part of the Hawk Point generation, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D is part of the Raphael generation, both based on Zen 4 architecture.

Architecture Differences

Both processors use the Zen 4 architecture, but they come from different codenames and generations. The Ryzen 3 210 is from the Hawk Point generation, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D is from the Raphael generation. The process node differs: the Ryzen 3 210 is built on a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D is built on a 5 nm process from TSMC. The transistor count and die size reflect this difference, with the Ryzen 3 210 carrying 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die and the Ryzen 7 7700X3D carrying 11,270 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The L1 cache is 64 KB per core for both, and the L2 cache is 1 MB per core for both. The L3 cache is the major architectural difference: 8 MB shared for the Ryzen 3 210 versus 96 MB shared for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D does not have a vCache 3D field in the database, but its large L3 cache is a defining feature. The Ryzen 3 210 is a mobile part with a 28 W TDP, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D is a desktop part with a 120 W TDP. The memory support is DDR5 for both, with dual-channel memory buses, but the Ryzen 3 210 has a higher theoretical memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s compared to 83.2 GB/s for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D. ECC memory is supported only on the Ryzen 7 7700X3D. The PCIe interface also differs: the Ryzen 3 210 uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D uses Gen 5 with 24 lanes. The integrated graphics differ as well, with the Ryzen 3 210 featuring Radeon 740M and the Ryzen 7 7700X3D featuring a generic Radeon Graphics solution.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 3 210 wins in the only category where measured data exists: benchmark scores. It has recorded results in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, plus multiple Passmark tests, giving it a percentile of 71 and an average score of 17,321. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its average score, showing that it performs competitively with other mid-range processors. The Ryzen 3 210 also has a higher boost clock at 4.70 GHz, a smaller process node at 4 nm, and higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s. It is a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, which indicates it is designed for systems where power consumption is a priority. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D wins on raw specifications. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, double the Ryzen 3 210’s core and thread counts. Its L3 cache is 96 MB, twelve times larger than the Ryzen 3 210’s 8 MB. Its base clock is 4.00 GHz, a full 1 GHz higher than the Ryzen 3 210’s 3.00 GHz. It supports ECC memory, uses PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, and is a desktop processor with a 120 W TDP. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D also has a launch MSRP of $329, while the Ryzen 3 210 has no recorded price. The data does not show any benchmark wins for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D because no benchmarks are recorded. The Ryzen 3 210 is therefore the only processor in this comparison with verified performance data, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D remains a specification-only entry in the database. For workloads that depend on high core counts and large cache, the specifications of the Ryzen 7 7700X3D suggest an advantage, but the database provides no measured confirmation. For workloads that depend on the recorded benchmarks, such as Cinebench multi-core and single-core tests and Passmark math and encryption tests, the Ryzen 3 210 delivers all available data points. The Ryzen 3 210’s 71st percentile placement, compared to the 50th percentile assigned to the Ryzen 7 7700X3D, further emphasizes that only one of these processors has been evaluated. The database treats the Ryzen 7 7700X3D as a processor with no test results, so any claim of its superiority would be speculative. The Ryzen 3 210, by contrast, has a full profile that places it alongside the Ryzen 5 4500, the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G, the Intel Core 7 150U, and the Intel Core i5-5200H in a narrow performance band from 17,239 to 17,395 average score, a span of only 156 points across all four rivals.