CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9755

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 128 Cores / 256 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 512 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 500W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6710E

CORE STATE Sierra Forest

CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 96 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 205W

ARCHITECTURE Sierra Forest

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

14,250

5,292

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

2,011

747

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

59,378

22,053

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

8,382

3,113

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

141,378

52,508

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

19,959

7,413

passmark_data_compression

4,517,407

1,230,786

passmark_data_encryption

284,927

81,850

passmark_extended_instructions

303,321

59,625

passmark_find_prime_numbers

2,047

451

passmark_floating_point_math

922,900

219,926

passmark_integer_math

1,549,946

302,954

passmark_multithread

166,328

61,775

passmark_physics

27,806

5,000

passmark_random_string_sorting

571,185

151,491

passmark_single_thread

3,503

1,910

passmark_singlethread

3,503

1,910

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9755 vs Intel Xeon 6710E

AMD AMD EPYC 9755 CPU and the 6710E deliver almost matching processing power in this comparison. The gaps between them sit under benchmark noise, indicating either will meet users just as effectively. The parity leaves the decision multifaceted. Additional factors get more significant. Availability typically affects the decision.

Game performance tests also indicate matched performance between AMD AMD EPYC 9755 CPU and the 6710E. Performance gaps generally fall below margin of error. Such marginal differences are barely noticeable during practical gameplay. The two chips achieve capable experiences. Those who game can decide assuredly between the options.

Considering a hardware perspective, AMD AMD EPYC 9755 CPU and the 6710E feature comparable capabilities. Thread arrangements, boost speeds, and cache configurations are nearly aligned. The specification balance supports the comparable performance figures. Neither possesses a significant technical lead. The matchup is fair.

Finally, users could pick based on price rather than benchmark performance exclusively. The two AMD AMD EPYC 9755 CPU and the 6710E provide solid results for their respective segments. The choice hinges on particular needs. Any selection is reasonable. Buyers won't go amiss between them.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9755

6710E

Core Specs

Cores

128

64 -50.0%

Threads

256

64 -75.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.7

2.4 -11.1%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.1

3.2 -22.0%

Frequency (GHz)

2.7

2.4 -11.1%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.1

3.2 -22.0%

Multiplier

24 -11.1%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

96 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

4 MB (per module)

L3 Cache

512 MB (shared)

96 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

500

205 -59.0%

Configurable TDP

450-500 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Sierra Forest

Codename

Turin

Sierra Forest

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

133,040 million

—

Die Size

16x 70.6 mm²

578 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

358.4 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 16 GT/s

CXL

Gen 2.0

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$12984

$2749

Part Number

100-000001443

SRPG2

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

106°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9755 Details View Xeon 6710E Details