CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9755

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 128 Cores / 256 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 512 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 500W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Core 7 240H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H

CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 24 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

14,250

2,053

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

2,011

289

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

59,378

8,558

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

8,382

1,208

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

141,378

20,378

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

19,959

2,877

passmark_data_compression

4,517,407

271,774

passmark_data_encryption

284,927

15,155

passmark_extended_instructions

303,321

16,897

passmark_find_prime_numbers

2,047

102

passmark_floating_point_math

922,900

58,905

passmark_integer_math

1,549,946

80,396

passmark_multithread

166,328

23,975

passmark_physics

27,806

1,723

passmark_random_string_sorting

571,185

28,866

passmark_single_thread

3,503

3,782

passmark_singlethread

3,503

3,782

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9755 vs Intel Core 7 240H

If you're comparing AMD's AMD EPYC 9755 compared to the Intel Intel Core 7 240H, the difference becomes quickly evident. Sporting stronger multi-core throughput, AMD's AMD EPYC 9755 offers noticeably more rapid processing in intensive tasks. This thread configuration superiority results obviously into practical benefits. Score data confirms this observation. Those wanting peak capability might notice what AMD's AMD EPYC 9755 provides to the comparison.

Game performance results furthermore benefit AMD's AMD EPYC 9755 in this analysis. Higher frame rates and more steady frame times result from its higher single-core speed. Gamers should notice improved performance, especially in CPU-limited situations. The edge continues in different scenarios. Multiplayer titles particularly gains from this capability edge.

In conclusion, AMD's AMD EPYC 9755 represents the more capable option in this evaluation. Its speed advantages support evaluation for anyone building a capable PC. Even though the Intel Intel Core 7 240H possesses its positives, this test figures definitely benefits AMD's AMD EPYC 9755. Reach your decision with this in mind. This benchmark margin is notable enough to matter.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9755

7 240H

Core Specs

Cores

128

10 -92.2%

Threads

256

16 -93.8%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.7

2.5 -7.4%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.1

5.2 +26.8%

Frequency (GHz)

2.7

2.5 -7.4%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.1

5.2 +26.8%

Multiplier

25 -7.4%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

512 MB (shared)

24 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

500

45 -91.0%

PL1

—

45 W

PL2

—

115 W

Configurable TDP

450-500 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Raptor Lake

Codename

Turin

Raptor Lake-H

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

133,040 million

—

Die Size

16x 70.6 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

5200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel BGA 1744

Chipsets

—

WM790, HM770

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4

E-Core Frequency

—

1800 MHz up to 4 GHz

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

Iris Xe Graphics 64EU

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Mobile

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$12984

$502

Part Number

100-000001443

SRQ6TQ5ML

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-BGA16F

Tj Max

—

100°C

View EPYC 9755 Details View Core 7 240H Details