CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9755

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 128 Cores / 256 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 512 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 500W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 3 100HL

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-PS
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
14,250
1,506
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
2,011
212
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
59,378
6,278
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
8,382
886
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
141,378
14,948
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
19,959
2,110
passmark_data_compression
4,517,407
202,225
passmark_data_encryption
284,927
11,964
passmark_extended_instructions
303,321
12,463
passmark_find_prime_numbers
2,047
48
passmark_floating_point_math
922,900
42,108
passmark_integer_math
1,549,946
56,308
passmark_multithread
166,328
17,586
passmark_physics
27,806
928
passmark_random_string_sorting
571,185
23,223
passmark_single_thread
3,503
3,735
passmark_singlethread
3,503
3,735

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9755 vs Intel Core 3 100HL

When comparing AMD AMD EPYC 9755 compared to Intel's Intel Core 3 100HL, the score disparity becomes obviously apparent. Sporting higher multi-threaded capabilities, AMD AMD EPYC 9755 delivers considerably speedier performance in intensive workloads. This CPU architecture advantage leads obviously into everyday advantages. Test results supports this conclusion. Buyers looking for pure capability can benefit from the advantages that AMD AMD EPYC 9755 provides to the comparison.

Playing games performance similarly support AMD AMD EPYC 9755 in this comparison. Increased frame rates and improved stable delivery emerge from the stronger single-core speed. Those who game might experience enhanced sessions, especially in CPU-demanding titles. This edge holds throughout different scenarios. Multiplayer titles notably benefits from this capability lead.

For users making a buying choice, AMD AMD EPYC 9755 appears as the preferred option. Its steady processing lead over Intel's Intel Core 3 100HL establishes it the wiser selection for enthusiast users. Factor in your particular workloads, but this benchmarks guides toward AMD AMD EPYC 9755. Reach an wise selection. This benchmark margin is significant and notable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9755
3 100HL
Core Specs
Cores
128
8 -93.8%
Threads
256
12 -95.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.7
2.1 -22.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.1
4.6 +12.2%
Frequency (GHz)
2.7
2.1 -22.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.1
4.6 +12.2%
Multiplier
27
21 -22.2%
SMP CPUs
2
1 -50.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
512 MB (shared)
12 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
500
45 -91.0%
PL1
45 W
PL2
115 W
Configurable TDP
450-500 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Turin
Raptor Lake-PS
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))
Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
133,040 million
Die Size
16x 70.6 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 1700
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1500 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Interconnect
CXL
Gen 2.0
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 48EU
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$12984
Part Number
100-000001443
unknown
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
View EPYC 9755 Details View Core 3 100HL Details