CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9745

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 128 Cores / 256 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 256 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 400W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 7 250H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
11,198
3,147
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,580
298
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
46,659
9,697
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
6,586
1,368
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
111,093
16,561
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
15,683
1,931
passmark_data_compression
3,929,890
303,269
passmark_data_encryption
229,447
18,206
passmark_extended_instructions
280,477
17,318
passmark_find_prime_numbers
979
106
passmark_floating_point_math
761,219
65,094
passmark_integer_math
1,224,315
99,100
passmark_multithread
130,698
27,030
passmark_physics
17,122
1,824
passmark_random_string_sorting
468,975
34,136
passmark_single_thread
2,806
4,148
passmark_singlethread
2,806
4,148

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9745 vs Intel Core 7 250H

During this direct matchup, AMD's AMD EPYC 9745 emerges as the definite champion. Its test figures demonstrate substantial advantages in all gaming workloads. If you're constructing a gaming build, AMD's AMD EPYC 9745 offers stronger power in this segment. This chip manages demanding tasks with grace. This is specifically apparent in practical applications.

Playing games performance furthermore support AMD's AMD EPYC 9745 in this matchup. Improved smoothness and more reliable frame times result from the better per-core capability. Gamers can observe enhanced performance, specifically in CPU-limited games. The advantage persists across different configurations. Esports gaming especially gains from this speed superiority.

Considering the technical details, AMD's AMD EPYC 9745 beats the Intel Intel Core 7 250H throughout the majority of tests. When it comes to gaming, this performance margin results in faster results. Users looking for top-tier speed would evaluate AMD's AMD EPYC 9745 as the stronger selection. The threaded performance is notably outstanding. Today's programs more and more utilize several processing units.

The bottom line: AMD's AMD EPYC 9745 takes this showdown obviously. Users seeking performance would certainly select AMD's AMD EPYC 9745 over the Intel Intel Core 7 250H. The test data confirms this conclusion. Your applications will gain from the stronger power. It's a obvious champion in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9745
7 250H
Core Specs
Cores
128
14 -89.1%
Threads
256
20 -92.2%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.4
2.5 +4.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.7
5.4 +45.9%
Frequency (GHz)
2.4
2.5 +4.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.7
5.4 +45.9%
Multiplier
24
25 +4.2%
SMP CPUs
2
1 -50.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
400
45 -88.8%
PL1
45 W
PL2
115 W
Configurable TDP
320-400 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Turin
Raptor Lake-H
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5c (Turin))
Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
3 nm
10 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel BGA 1744
Chipsets
WM790, HM770
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
1800 MHz up to 4 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Interconnect
CXL
Gen 2.0
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$12141
$502
Part Number
100-000001460
SRQ6UQ5MK
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
100°C
View EPYC 9745 Details View Core 7 250H Details