CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9535

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 128 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 4.3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 300W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6337P

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R

CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.5 Base / 5.3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 18 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 80W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression

2,308,822

237,373

passmark_data_encryption

127,372

12,604

passmark_extended_instructions

175,784

15,366

passmark_find_prime_numbers

874

108

passmark_floating_point_math

457,047

53,150

passmark_integer_math

730,281

72,301

passmark_multithread

114,528

22,098

passmark_physics

3,834

1,729

passmark_random_string_sorting

247,506

26,135

passmark_single_thread

3,720

4,104

passmark_singlethread

3,720

4,104

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

N/A

1,893

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

N/A

267

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

N/A

7,888

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

N/A

1,113

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

N/A

18,783

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

N/A

2,651

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9535 vs Intel Xeon 6337P

The comparison between Intel 6337P CPU and the AMD AMD EPYC 9535 demonstrates remarkably close results. These chips offer comparable numbers throughout typical scenarios, positioning the selection mainly dependent on specific needs. The test figures confirms this assessment. No processor maintains a overwhelming advantage. Consumers can choose based on additional variables.

Gaming results also show similar performance between Intel 6337P CPU and the AMD AMD EPYC 9535. FPS gaps often sit within margin of error. This marginal gaps are rarely noticeable during everyday play sessions. Each chips deliver capable results. Gaming enthusiasts can pick assuredly between the options.

Rather than dwelling on slight frame rate differences, prospective consumers could weigh other elements. thermal performance, noise levels, platform costs, and functionality often are important more than small benchmark advantages. Such considerations could influence the scales. Think broadly. This larger view plays a role.

In conclusion, this comparison between Intel 6337P CPU and the AMD AMD EPYC 9535 finishes in a virtual tie. Performance variations are minimal and improbable to affect real-world experience. Concentrate your decision on cost, ecosystem preferences, and specific capability priorities. The two are capable choices. This parity is actual.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9535

6337P

Core Specs

Cores

6 -90.6%

Threads

128

12 -90.6%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.4

3.5 +45.8%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.3

5.3 +23.3%

Frequency (GHz)

2.4

3.5 +45.8%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.3

5.3 +23.3%

Multiplier

35 +45.8%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

1.25 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

18 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

300

80 -73.3%

Configurable TDP

240-300 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Raptor Lake

Codename

Turin

Raptor Lake-R

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

66,520 million

—

Die Size

8x 70.6 mm²

163 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

4800 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 1700

Chipsets

—

C262, C266

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

—

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$8992

$375

Part Number

100-000001147

SRPLU

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA16A

Tj Max

—

100°C

View EPYC 9535 Details View Xeon 6337P Details