CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9475F

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 48 Cores / 96 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.65 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 400W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Core 5 120

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R

CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo

CACHE 18 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 65W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression

2,156,305

219,535

passmark_data_encryption

116,648

11,131

passmark_extended_instructions

173,169

14,264

passmark_find_prime_numbers

1,507

passmark_floating_point_math

406,524

45,383

passmark_integer_math

605,696

60,462

passmark_multithread

122,476

18,597

passmark_physics

16,443

1,333

passmark_random_string_sorting

253,936

21,499

passmark_single_thread

3,779

3,595

passmark_singlethread

3,779

3,595

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

N/A

1,840

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

N/A

259

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

N/A

7,667

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

N/A

1,082

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

N/A

18,255

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

N/A

2,577

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9475F vs Intel Core 5 120

If processing power is so close, the comparison between AMD's AMD EPYC 9475F chip and Intel Core 5 120 (Intel) grows increasingly complex. The two chips trade blows over various tests. The overall picture is one of surprising equality. None of the comes out as a definite champion. This determination hinges on particular preferences.

Over obsessing on minor performance differences, potential consumers can weigh other considerations. TDP, fan noise, total build cost, and extras often play a role bigger than marginal speed gains. The elements might tip the balance. Consider comprehensively. This broader picture plays a role.

None of the chip maintains a definitive edge in this comparison. AMD's AMD EPYC 9475F chip wins marginally in particular benchmarks, while Intel Core 5 120 (Intel) claims others. The swapping dynamic suggests fundamental parity between the processors. The differences are marginal and probably negligible in practical scenarios. The two achieve capable capability.

To summarize, this analysis between AMD's AMD EPYC 9475F chip and Intel Core 5 120 (Intel) ends in a effective stalemate. Speed deltas are small and doubtful to impact real-world applications. Focus your determination on value, motherboard preferences, and individual feature needs. The two are excellent choices. The parity is genuine.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9475F

5 120

Core Specs

Cores

6 -87.5%

Threads

12 -87.5%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.65

2.5 -31.5%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.8

4.5 -6.2%

Frequency (GHz)

3.65

2.5 -31.5%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.8

4.5 -6.2%

Multiplier

36.5

25 -31.5%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

1.25 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

18 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

400

65 -83.8%

PL1

—

65 W

PL2

—

110 W

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Raptor Lake

Codename

Turin

Raptor Lake-R

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

66,520 million

—

Die Size

8x 70.6 mm²

163 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

4800 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 1700

Chipsets

—

Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

UHD Graphics 730

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Desktop

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$7592

$211

Part Number

100-000001143

SA35V

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA16A

Tj Max

—

100°C

Bundled Cooler

—

Laminar RM1

View EPYC 9475F Details View Core 5 120 Details