AMD EPYC 9375F vs Intel Xeon 6732P Comparison

The AMD EPYC 9375F and Intel Xeon 6732P are both 32-core, 64-thread server processors aimed at the same high-end segment. Head-to-head benchmark data shows the AMD part winning 16 of 17 recorded tests, with Intel’s only victory being a marginal 0.5% margin in floating point math. The AMD EPYC 9375F also holds a higher average benchmark score of 162497 versus Intel’s 143444, a 13.3% difference. Both processors rank in the 98th percentile of all CPUs, but the AMD record shows a consistent lead across most workload types.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking win for the AMD EPYC 9375F appears in Passmark find prime numbers, where it scores 1397 against Intel’s 628, a 122.5% advantage. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, AMD scores 81402 while Intel scores 63621, a 27.9% lead. The same margin repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core (34188 vs 26720, 27.9%) and Cinebench R15 multi-core (8205 vs 6412, 28%). Single-thread performance also favors AMD heavily: Cinebench R23 single-core shows 11492 versus 8981, a 28% lead, and Passmark single-thread shows 3762 against 2506, a 50.1% advantage. AMD also leads in integer math (387901 vs 334340, 16%), data compression (1496149 vs 1339480, 11.7%), data encryption (73634 vs 63848, 15.3%), extended instructions (128296 vs 106697, 20.2%), random string sorting (161091 vs 133467, 20.7%), physics (9019 vs 8109, 11.2%), and multithread (95768 vs 74849, 27.9%). The only test where Intel wins is Passmark floating point math, scoring 261703 against AMD’s 260392, a 0.5% margin. The overall average score gap is 162497 for AMD versus 143444 for Intel, which is a 13.3% difference.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the highest multi-core performance?

A: The AMD EPYC 9375F wins in every Cinebench multi-core test. For example, Cinebench R23 multi-core gives AMD 81402 versus Intel’s 63621, a 27.9% advantage.

Q: Which processor is better for single-threaded tasks?

A: The AMD EPYC 9375F. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 11492 versus 8981, a 28% lead, and in Passmark single-thread it scores 3762 versus 2506, a 50.1% lead.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the Intel Xeon 6732P wins?

A: Yes, Passmark floating point math: Intel scores 261703 versus AMD’s 260392, a 0.5% margin. This is the only recorded win for Intel in the head-to-head data.

Q: How do memory bandwidth numbers compare?

A: The AMD EPYC 9375F uses a twelve-channel memory bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel Xeon 6732P uses an eight-channel bus with 409.6 GB/s.

Q: What are the cache size differences?

A: AMD has a 256 MB shared L3 cache, while Intel has 144 MB. Intel has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches: 112 KB and 2 MB versus AMD’s 80 KB and 1 MB.

Q: Do both processors have the same core count?

A: Yes, both have 32 cores and 64 threads, but the AMD part has a higher boost clock (4.80 GHz versus 4.10 GHz) and a lower TDP (320 W versus 350 W).

Architecture Differences

The AMD EPYC 9375F is built on the Zen 5 architecture (codename Turin) and manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process, while the Intel Xeon 6732P uses Granite Rapids on Intel’s 5 nm process. This node difference likely contributes to AMD’s higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz versus Intel’s 4.10 GHz. The AMD part also has a larger shared L3 cache at 256 MB, compared to Intel’s 144 MB, and a twelve-channel memory bus that delivers 576.0 GB/s, while Intel’s eight-channel memory bus delivers 409.6 GB/s. Intel, however, provides larger per-core L1 and L2 caches: 112 KB and 2 MB versus AMD’s 80 KB and 1 MB. The AMD part has 128 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while Intel offers 136 lanes. The socket types also differ: AMD uses Socket SP5, Intel uses Socket 4710. These architectural choices explain the benchmark outcomes: AMD’s higher boost clock, larger L3 cache, and memory bandwidth give it the edge in multi-core and single-core tests, while Intel’s larger L2 per core does not translate into a performance lead in the recorded benchmarks.

The Verdict

The data strongly favors the AMD EPYC 9375F. It wins 16 of 17 head-to-head tests, with an average score of 162497 versus Intel’s 143444, a 13.3% gap. Both processors are in the 98th percentile, but AMD’s performance advantage is consistent across Cinebench, Passmark integer math, compression, encryption, and single-thread tests. The Intel Xeon 6732P’s only win, floating point math, is a 0.5% margin that is unlikely to affect real-world workloads. For any task that relies on integer math, rendering, or multithreaded throughput, the AMD EPYC 9375F is the superior choice. The Intel part does not offer a meaningful advantage in any of the measured categories.

Specification Differences

| Feature | AMD EPYC 9375F | Intel Xeon 6732P |

|---------|----------------|------------------|

| Base clock | 3.85 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.10 GHz |

| TDP | 320 W | 350 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket SP4 | Intel Socket 4710 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 (Turin) | Granite Rapids |

| Process node | 4 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 cache (per core) | 80 KB | 112 KB |

| L2 cache (per core) | 1 MB | 2 MB |

| L3 cache (shared) | 256 MB | 144 MB |

| Memory bus | Twelve-channel | Eight-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 409.6 GB/s |

| PCIe lanes | Gen 5, 128 lanes | Gen 5, 136 lanes |

| Release date | 2024-10-09 | 2025-05-21 |

| Launch MSRP | $5306 | $5295 |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD EPYC 9375F wins in all Cinebench versions (R15, R20, R23) for both single-core and multi-core, as well as Passmark data compression, data encryption, integer math, extended instructions, find prime numbers, multithread, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread tests. This covers the majority of server workloads, including database processing, virtualization, and high-performance computing. The Intel Xeon 6732P’s only win is Passmark floating point math, with a 0.5% advantage. That margin is negligible for most applications. For workloads that are heavily floating point oriented, such as certain scientific or machine learning tasks, the Intel part might have a tiny edge, but the overall performance difference is too small to justify selecting Intel based on the recorded data. All other benchmark evidence points to the AMD EPYC 9375F as the better processor in this comparison.