CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9375F

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.85 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 256 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 320W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6337P

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.5 Base / 5.3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 18 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 80W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
8,205
1,893
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,158
267
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
34,188
7,888
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
4,826
1,113
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
81,402
18,783
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
11,492
2,651
passmark_data_compression
1,496,149
237,373
passmark_data_encryption
73,634
12,604
passmark_extended_instructions
128,296
15,366
passmark_find_prime_numbers
1,397
108
passmark_floating_point_math
260,392
53,150
passmark_integer_math
387,901
72,301
passmark_multithread
95,768
22,098
passmark_physics
9,019
1,729
passmark_random_string_sorting
161,091
26,135
passmark_single_thread
3,762
4,104
passmark_singlethread
3,762
4,104

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9375F vs Intel Xeon 6337P

the AMD EPYC 9375F chip from AMD and Intel's 6337P provide almost equal processing power in every comparison. The deltas between these two land under testing variance, implying either will meet builders just as adequately. The equality renders the determination multifaceted. Alternative elements become particularly critical. Availability typically influences the decision.

Considering a hardware perspective, the AMD EPYC 9375F chip from AMD and Intel's 6337P have comparable specs. Execution configurations, speed rates, and memory subsystem amounts are tightly aligned. The technical parity explains the matched test figures. None of the holds a notable specification advantage. The comparison is fair.

Considering a hardware viewpoint, the AMD EPYC 9375F chip from AMD and Intel's 6337P feature matching capabilities. Execution arrangements, clock clocks, and memory subsystem capacities are tightly aligned. This spec balance supports the comparable score figures. No maintains a substantial engineering superiority. This comparison is balanced.

For people conflicted between the AMD EPYC 9375F chip from AMD and Intel's 6337P, remain comfortable that both selection achieves comparable performance. This performance results demonstrates no clear winner. Base your choice on alternative variables and benefit from excellent capability in any case. Each are excellent in their particular regard. Pick confidently.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9375F
6337P
Core Specs
Cores
32
6 -81.3%
Threads
64
12 -81.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.85
3.5 -9.1%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.8
5.3 +10.4%
Frequency (GHz)
3.85
3.5 -9.1%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.8
5.3 +10.4%
Multiplier
38.5
35 -9.1%
SMP CPUs
2
1 -50.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
18 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
320
80 -75.0%
Configurable TDP
320-400 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Turin
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))
Xeon 6 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
66,520 million
Die Size
8x 70.6 mm²
163 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
C262, C266
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Interconnect
CXL
Gen 2.0
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$5306
$375
Part Number
100-000001197
SRPLU
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
View EPYC 9375F Details View Xeon 6337P Details