CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9375F

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.85 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 320W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Core 5 120

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R

CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo

CACHE 18 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 65W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

8,205

1,840

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,158

259

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

34,188

7,667

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

4,826

1,082

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

81,402

18,255

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

11,492

2,577

passmark_data_compression

1,496,149

219,535

passmark_data_encryption

73,634

11,131

passmark_extended_instructions

128,296

14,264

passmark_find_prime_numbers

1,397

passmark_floating_point_math

260,392

45,383

passmark_integer_math

387,901

60,462

passmark_multithread

95,768

18,597

passmark_physics

9,019

1,333

passmark_random_string_sorting

161,091

21,499

passmark_single_thread

3,762

3,595

passmark_singlethread

3,762

3,595

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9375F vs Intel Core 5 120

Reviewing the test numbers for AMD's AMD EPYC 9375F chip and Intel Core 5 120 (Intel), a picture of close processing appears. None of the processor leads reliably throughout the tests. This alternating of leads means core parity. Consumers face a actual dilemma with these options. The two options offer strong performance.

Gaming tests similarly indicate close performance between AMD's AMD EPYC 9375F chip and Intel Core 5 120 (Intel). FPS differences often land inside testing variance. These small deltas are barely perceptible during everyday play sessions. Either processors deliver capable performance. Gamers can pick comfortably between the options.

Over obsessing on marginal frame rate gaps, prospective users can weigh secondary variables. energy consumption, acoustics, platform costs, and capabilities usually count more than marginal benchmark advantages. These considerations should tip the choice. Think comprehensively. The broader perspective matters.

At the end of the day, users can decide based on specific requirements instead of benchmark numbers alone. The two AMD's AMD EPYC 9375F chip and Intel Core 5 120 (Intel) provide solid throughput for the target tiers. This determination depends on individual preferences. Each choice is reasonable. Consumers shouldn't go badly with these options.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9375F

5 120

Core Specs

Cores

6 -81.3%

Threads

12 -81.3%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.85

2.5 -35.1%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.8

4.5 -6.2%

Frequency (GHz)

3.85

2.5 -35.1%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.8

4.5 -6.2%

Multiplier

38.5

25 -35.1%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

1.25 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

18 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

320

65 -79.7%

PL1

—

65 W

PL2

—

110 W

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Raptor Lake

Codename

Turin

Raptor Lake-R

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

66,520 million

—

Die Size

8x 70.6 mm²

163 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

4800 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 1700

Chipsets

—

Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

UHD Graphics 730

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Desktop

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$5306

$211

Part Number

100-000001197

SA35V

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA16A

Tj Max

—

100°C

Bundled Cooler

—

Laminar RM1

View EPYC 9375F Details View Core 5 120 Details