CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9335

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3 Base / 4.4 GHz Turbo

CACHE 128 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 210W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6710E

CORE STATE Sierra Forest

CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 96 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 205W

ARCHITECTURE Sierra Forest

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression

1,203,096

1,230,786

passmark_data_encryption

63,159

81,850

passmark_extended_instructions

105,706

59,625

passmark_find_prime_numbers

340

451

passmark_floating_point_math

228,123

219,926

passmark_integer_math

346,291

302,954

passmark_multithread

65,811

61,775

passmark_physics

1,905

5,000

passmark_random_string_sorting

116,608

151,491

passmark_single_thread

2,732

1,910

passmark_singlethread

2,732

1,910

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

N/A

5,292

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

N/A

747

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

N/A

22,053

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

N/A

3,113

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

N/A

52,508

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

N/A

7,413

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9335 vs Intel Xeon 6710E

Analyzing the test data for AMD AMD EPYC 9335 and 6710E (Intel), the story of competitive throughput emerges. No chip dominates steadily across the benchmarks. The swapping of leads suggests fundamental equality. Buyers face a real selection in this matchup. Either CPUs provide competent capability.

None of the chip maintains a clear superiority in this comparison. AMD AMD EPYC 9335 wins slightly in certain tests, while 6710E (Intel) claims different ones. The back-and-forth trend implies core balance between them. The deltas are slight and possibly imperceptible in actual usage. Both achieve excellent capability.

In-game tests additionally demonstrate competitive numbers between AMD AMD EPYC 9335 and 6710E (Intel). Smoothness differences typically land below margin of error. These small deltas are seldom perceptible during actual gameplay. Each processors provide responsive results. Gaming enthusiasts could select confidently between these two.

At the end of the day: AMD AMD EPYC 9335 and 6710E (Intel) are evenly comparable. Not one merits a definite recommendation over the rival. Let cost and ecosystem factors shape your concluding selection. Both options should fulfill you effectively. It's a safe choice.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9335

6710E

Core Specs

Cores

64 +100.0%

Threads

64 0.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.4 -20.0%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.4

3.2 -27.3%

Frequency (GHz)

2.4 -20.0%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.4

3.2 -27.3%

Multiplier

24 -20.0%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

96 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

4 MB (per module)

L3 Cache

128 MB (shared)

96 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

210

205 -2.4%

Configurable TDP

200-240 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Sierra Forest

Codename

Turin

Sierra Forest

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

33,260 million

—

Die Size

4x 70.6 mm²

578 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

358.4 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 16 GT/s

CXL

Gen 2.0

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$3178

$2749

Part Number

100-000001149

SRPG2

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

106°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9335 Details View Xeon 6710E Details