CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9275F

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 24 Cores / 48 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4.1 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 256 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 320W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6980P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids
CORE SPECS 128 Cores / 256 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 3.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 504 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 500W
ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
7,250
6,367
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,023
898
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
30,209
26,533
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
4,264
3,745
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
71,927
63,175
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
10,154
8,918
passmark_data_compression
1,212,560
2,364,519
passmark_data_encryption
62,664
125,246
passmark_extended_instructions
94,889
214,794
passmark_find_prime_numbers
991
555
passmark_floating_point_math
201,888
501,720
passmark_integer_math
317,777
637,476
passmark_multithread
84,620
74,324
passmark_physics
12,089
3,350
passmark_random_string_sorting
144,037
240,792
passmark_single_thread
3,810
1,681
passmark_singlethread
3,810
1,681

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9275F vs Intel Xeon 6980P

If processing power is so similar, the matchup between AMD EPYC 9275F and the Intel 6980P becomes particularly nuanced. Each processors trade blows across various scenarios. The overall result is one of notable equivalence. Not one appears as a clear winner. This decision rests on personal preferences.

Instead of dwelling on small benchmark gaps, interested buyers could weigh additional variables. TDP, fan noise, total build cost, and functionality often count bigger than slight speed improvements. The factors could sway the choice. Evaluate broadly. The larger context plays a role.

In-game performance additionally demonstrate close scores between AMD EPYC 9275F and the Intel 6980P. Performance deltas generally remain under single digits. This slight deltas are rarely noticeable during actual gameplay. Either chips deliver capable performance. Those who game can select assuredly between them.

In the end, builders should select based on specific requirements as opposed to pure scores exclusively. Both AMD EPYC 9275F and the Intel 6980P offer excellent throughput for their given segments. This determination depends on specific needs. Both option is good. You can't go badly here.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9275F
6980P
Core Specs
Cores
24
128 +433.3%
Threads
48
256 +433.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
4.1
2 -51.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.8
3.9 -18.8%
Frequency (GHz)
4.1
2 -51.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.8
3.9 -18.8%
Multiplier
41
20 -51.2%
SMP CPUs
2
2 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
112 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
504 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
320
500 +56.3%
Configurable TDP
320-400 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Granite Rapids
Codename
Turin
Granite Rapids
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))
Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-AP)
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
66,520 million
Die Size
8x 70.6 mm²
3x 598 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Twelve-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
614.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 7529
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
6 x24 24 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$3439
$12460
Part Number
100-000001144
SRPL2Q5SM
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
95°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 9275F Details View Xeon 6980P Details