CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9275F

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 24 Cores / 48 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4.1 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 256 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 320W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6507P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.5 Base / 4.3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 48 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 150W
ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
7,250
2,676
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,023
377
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
30,209
11,150
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
4,264
1,573
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
71,927
26,548
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
10,154
3,747
passmark_data_compression
1,212,560
356,190
passmark_data_encryption
62,664
17,753
passmark_extended_instructions
94,889
27,385
passmark_find_prime_numbers
991
224
passmark_floating_point_math
201,888
69,604
passmark_integer_math
317,777
88,877
passmark_multithread
84,620
31,233
passmark_physics
12,089
2,935
passmark_random_string_sorting
144,037
39,682
passmark_single_thread
3,810
3,643
passmark_singlethread
3,810
3,643

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9275F vs Intel Xeon 6507P

the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F and the 6507P chip from Intel deliver almost identical processing power in our comparison. Any gaps between both chips sit within margin of error, indicating both can serve builders similarly adequately. The equivalence leaves the choice multifaceted. Alternative factors get especially relevant. Value often tips the balance.

No CPU has a clear lead here. the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F edges barely in some tests, while the 6507P chip from Intel claims others. The swapping dynamic indicates core parity between the processors. Any differences are slight and likely negligible in everyday scenarios. The two provide excellent capability.

Playing games performance additionally indicate close performance between the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F and the 6507P chip from Intel. FPS differences generally remain below margin of error. These marginal differences are barely detectable during actual gameplay. Each options offer smooth gaming. Those who game might select assuredly between both chips.

To summarize, the comparison between the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F and the 6507P chip from Intel ends in a effective draw. Performance deltas are minor and unlikely to influence everyday applications. Concentrate your choice on value, platform preferences, and particular feature priorities. The two are solid selections. The draw is true.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9275F
6507P
Core Specs
Cores
24
8 -66.7%
Threads
48
16 -66.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
4.1
3.5 -14.6%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.8
4.3 -10.4%
Frequency (GHz)
4.1
3.5 -14.6%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.8
4.3 -10.4%
Multiplier
41
35 -14.6%
SMP CPUs
2
2 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
112 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
48 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
320
150 -53.1%
Configurable TDP
320-400 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Granite Rapids
Codename
Turin
Granite Rapids
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))
Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
66,520 million
Die Size
8x 70.6 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
409.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 4710
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
3 x24 24 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$3439
$765
Part Number
100-000001144
SRVU5
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
103°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 9275F Details View Xeon 6507P Details