CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 8024P

CORE STATE Siena
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 32 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 90W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4c
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
AMD
AMD

EPYC 9275F

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 24 Cores / 48 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4.1 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 256 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 320W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,761
7,250
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
248
1,023
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
7,338
30,209
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,035
4,264
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
17,472
71,927
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,466
10,154
passmark_data_compression
232,242
1,212,560
passmark_data_encryption
15,809
62,664
passmark_extended_instructions
14,251
94,889
passmark_find_prime_numbers
109
991
passmark_floating_point_math
34,757
201,888
passmark_integer_math
62,128
317,777
passmark_multithread
20,556
84,620
passmark_physics
1,905
12,089
passmark_random_string_sorting
34,613
144,037
passmark_single_thread
2,371
3,810
passmark_singlethread
2,371
3,810

Analysis: AMD EPYC 8024P vs AMD EPYC 9275F

Processing hunters comparing the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F versus AMD EPYC 8024P from AMD can observe at once that the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F takes the top spot. This chip shines in resource-hungry applications, establishing it perfect for power users. Its engineering enhancements over AMD EPYC 8024P from AMD convert into noticeable daily gains. Whether it's content creation, the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F dependably beats its competitor. The margin is substantial enough to impact actual performance.

Analyzing the technical details, the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F surpasses AMD EPYC 8024P from AMD across most tests. For gaming, this processing difference means smoother outcomes. Those seeking maximum power should look at the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F as the stronger selection. The threaded processing is specifically impressive. Contemporary workloads increasingly utilize many processing units.

Considering the technical details, the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F outperforms AMD EPYC 8024P from AMD over many tests. For content creation, the benchmark gap leads to faster results. Those wanting top-tier capability will examine the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F as the superior choice. The concurrent performance is especially notable. Current applications progressively utilize several threads.

When all is said and done: the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F takes this comparison decisively. Users prioritizing capability would definitely favor the AMD AMD EPYC 9275F over AMD EPYC 8024P from AMD. This test numbers validates this assessment. Your workloads can improve from the higher throughput. It's a straightforward victor in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 8024P
EPYC 9275F
Core Specs
Cores
8
24 +200.0%
Threads
16
48 +200.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.4
4.1 +70.8%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3
4.8 +60.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2.4
4.1 +70.8%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3
4.8 +60.0%
Multiplier
24
41 +70.8%
SMP CPUs
1
2 +100.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
32 MB (shared)
256 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
90
320 +255.6%
Configurable TDP
70-100 W
320-400 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4c
Zen 5
Codename
Siena
Turin
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))
Process Size
5 nm
4 nm
Transistors
8,875 million
66,520 million
Die Size
73 mm²
8x 70.6 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Six-channel
Twelve-channel
Memory Bandwidth
230.4 GB/s
576.0 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
AMD Socket SP5
PCIe
Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
6 nm
Interconnect
CXL
Gen 2.0
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$409
$3439
Part Number
100-000001136
100-000001144
Package
FC-LGA4844
FC-LGA6096
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 8024P Details View EPYC 9275F Details